Is a joke on shooting illegal immigrants acceptable from our government?

[Phokus]

They all should be saying it. When someone invades your country, you kill them. Tends to discourage them from doing it again.

Hey, the resident rightwing violent sociopath strikes again.

 

[Jaskalas]

Hey, the resident rightwing violent sociopath strikes again.

Solve the problem and people won't want to get violent. Unless violence is also your solution.

 

[Nebor]

You live in Mexico? Oh, I see, you think we should be more LIKE Mexico. So what's the problem with their people here esse?

Are you saying we're somehow better than Mexico? Like we're some higher form of life or something? Their people shouldn't be here because they're not Americans, just like we shouldn't illegally immigrate to Mexico because we're not Mexicans. The difference is, if you try to illegally enter Mexico from the south, they fucking kill you.

 

[Nebor]

Solve the problem and people won't want to get violent. Unless violence is also your solution.

He doesn't have solutions, just a bleeding heart without the capacity to visit violence on others. So he stands by while others do the dirty work for him and then complains about how they do it. Typical.

 

[Phokus]

He doesn't have solutions, just a bleeding heart without the capacity to visit violence on others. So he stands by while others do the dirty work for him and then complains about how they do it. Typical.

LMAO, you rightwingers are fucked in the head, seriously get help.

 

[Jaskalas]

LMAO, you rightwingers are fucked in the head, seriously get help.

Stop the illegal invasion, or there is no help.

 

[Phokus]

Stop the illegal invasion, or there is no help.

Dude, there's no justification for shooting someone to death using someone's legal immigration status as the sole justification. We're not even talking about someone who's trespassing on your property or threatening your life. Conservatives are seriously fucked in the head.

 

[Blueychan]

good! i am running out of hunting target ...

 

[Jaskalas]

Dude, there's no justification for shooting someone to death using someone's legal immigration status as the sole justification. We're not even talking about someone who's trespassing on your property or threatening your life. Conservatives are seriously fucked in the head.

Read my post.

I do not support killing or deporting them. You need to understand that action MUST be taken to seal the border NOW. It's past due, should have been done when Bush was in office. If the problem is not resolved then conservatives who fear for the sovereignty of their nation will cause you a great deal of problems.

The least of which is taking matters into their own hands. You want to stop a blood bath, you calm things down. You can't do that with an open border. SEAL IT IMMEDIATELY.

You already know what happens if you don't, they're threatening it.

 

[AyashiKaibutsu]

Yea, I mean if we have mexicans in the fields then where is our middle class going to go after we've thoroughly crushed them into poverty.

I find it mildly funny that a country built on immigration freaks out about immigrants. How about give them a legal avvenue to get here that mets the demand of employers, and regulate it tough enough so they aren't able to get away with paying them pennies. Wait, shouldn't just keeping the way open and letting the market sort this out fix everything?

 

[Phokus]

Read my post.

I do not support killing or deporting them. You need to understand that action MUST be taken to seal the border NOW. It's past due, should have been done when Bush was in office. If the problem is not resolved then conservatives who fear for the sovereignty of their nation will cause you a great deal of problems.

The least of which is taking matters into their own hands. You want to stop a blood bath, you calm things down. You can't do that with an open border. SEAL IT IMMEDIATELY.

You already know what happens if you don't, they're threatening it.

I read your post, i was responding to people who actually advocate murder and you responded back to me as if that had anything to do with their posts. For one thing, you could build a wall all you want, but if someone is motivated, they'll cross over (see: tunnels that are dug to sneak in). Personally, i think conservatives threatening wild west violence is a bigger problem than something you can't really control all that much. Besides, wall street/corporate republicans love illegal aliens, and corporations/wall street control our government, so good luck stopping them!

 

[Nebor]

I read your post, i was responding to people who actually advocate murder and you responded back to me as if that had anything to do with their posts. For one thing, you could build a wall all you want, but if someone is motivated, they'll cross over (see: tunnels that are dug to sneak in). Personally, i think conservatives threatening wild west violence is a bigger problem than something you can't really control all that much. Besides, wall street/corporate republicans love illegal aliens, and corporations/wall street control our government, so good luck stopping them!

You've got to be kidding with your defeatist attitude. We absolutely could seal the border with at least 90% effectiveness. Central American, Middle Eastern, European and Asian countries do this through a combination of armed guards\military, fences\walls & electronic sensors. Do you REALLY think we couldn't effectively seal our southern border if the political will power to do so was there?

But then, someone like you would think that. You enjoy the secure, cushy lifestyle provided by your fortunate birth and the hard work & sacrifice of bolder men\women. You don't realize that most of the developing world would happily slit you and your families throat to enjoy the quality of life that you take for granted while criticizing the manner in which it's been provided.

 

[Phokus]

You've got to be kidding with your defeatist attitude. We absolutely could seal the border with at least 90% effectiveness. Central American, Middle Eastern, European and Asian countries do this through a combination of armed guards\military, fences\walls & electronic sensors. Do you REALLY think we couldn't effectively seal our southern border if the political will power to do so was there?

But then, someone like you would think that. You enjoy the secure, cushy lifestyle provided by your fortunate birth and the hard work & sacrifice of bolder men\women. You don't realize that most of the developing world would happily slit you and your families throat to enjoy the quality of life that you take for granted while criticizing the manner in which it's been provided.

You're dumb. There's nowhere else in the world that's really comparable to the US/Mexico situation. The situation in the US and Mexico is night and day in terms of economics, and also the fact that drug lords took over the country and they're killing/kidnapping everyone, so there's an extremely high demand to escape into the US. Do you even realize how enormous the border is?

 

[jonks]

If it was a funny joke, sure. So, in this case, no.

 

[Infohawk]

Phokus only supports violence if its done against CEOs.

 

[Jaskalas]

Phokus only supports violence if its done against CEOs.

To ignore the border IS supporting violence. The consequences are inherent.

Do you even realize how enormous the border is?

To scale with the enormous size of the country. This is only a matter of priorities.

Do you wish to deal with conservatives in the very same manner in which you say conservatives cannot deal with illegals? They will make themselves at least as big a threat and problem to the security of the nation as the threats they poise themselves to fight against.

They want a melting pot, that is what this nation is supposed to be. Do you not side with them, or do you favor those assimilating (invading) the nation? All you have to do is ensure this nation's melting pot is functioning and there need not be violence. To stop conservatives, secure the border, and assimilate the illegal population.

 

[Phokus]

Phokus only supports violence if its done against CEOs.

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2147320&highlight=joke

Only a retard would have interpreted it that way.

Then again, considering the Germany debate we've had, it's not exactly a surprise.

 

[Phokus]

To ignore the border IS supporting violence. The consequences are inherent.



To scale with the enormous size of the country. This is only a matter of priorities.

Do you wish to deal with conservatives in the very same manner in which you say conservatives cannot deal with illegals? They will make themselves at least as big a threat and problem to the security of the nation as the threats they poise themselves to fight against.

They want a melting pot, that is what this nation is supposed to be. Do you not side with them, or do you favor those assimilating (invading) the nation? All you have to do is ensure this nation's melting pot is functioning and there need not be violence. To stop conservatives, secure the border, and assimilate the illegal population.

Lol, first, stop using the word 'invasion'. It's that type of rhetoric that makes it hard to take the issue seriously. Securing the border to the point where you guys are satisfied would cost an insane amount of money. It's easier to secure a border with a more densely populated country (we're sparsely populated), a smaller border, less motivated immigrants, and immigrants that are far away rather than right next door.

 

[Infohawk]

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2147320&highlight=joke

Only a retard would have interpreted it that way.

Then again, considering the Germany debate we've had, it's not exactly a surprise.

I wasn't referring to that thread. It's just obvious based on the fact that you like bleating about revolution over banking issues. You don't think revolution involves violence?

 

[comptr6]

They all should be saying it. When someone invades your country, you kill them. Tends to discourage them from doing it again.

Damn straight! Shawna Forde and Gunny Bush are true heroes and patriots.

 

[Phokus]

I wasn't referring to that thread. It's just obvious based on the fact that you like bleating about revolution over banking issues. You don't think revolution involves violence?

LoL

1) Since when is violence against the oppressors necessary for a revolution? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonviolent_revolution

Sometimes it's necessary sometimes it's not though.

2) Having a 'revolution' (in YOUR definition) against wall street would mean overthrowing the government.

I think i've stated a bunch of times that i'd like to send bankers to GITMO, semi-humorously.

 

[Nebor]

Lol, first, stop using the word 'invasion'. It's that type of rhetoric that makes it hard to take the issue seriously. Securing the border to the point where you guys are satisfied would cost an insane amount of money. It's easier to secure a border with a more densely populated country (we're sparsely populated), a smaller border, less motivated immigrants, and immigrants that are far away rather than right next door.

Actually the cost of securing the border would pale in comparison to the cost of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan because our logistical supply trains would be dramatically shorter. Also once a few hundred wall jumpers were killed, a deterrent effect would begin to take root in the Mexican population.

I'm telling you it's possible, I know it's possible, and I'd be happy to serve on the US-Mexican border. You're (from what I can tell) just a kid with ill formed convictions saying "you're dumb! lulz!"

 

[Herr Kutz]

What usually happens to invaders?

 

[Phokus]

Actually the cost of securing the border would pale in comparison to the cost of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan because our logistical supply trains would be dramatically shorter. Also once a few hundred wall jumpers were killed, a deterrent effect would begin to take root in the Mexican population.

I'm telling you it's possible, I know it's possible, and I'd be happy to serve on the US-Mexican border. You're (from what I can tell) just a kid with ill formed convictions saying "you're dumb! lulz!"

Except, 1) This isn't a war you idiot. "Supply train"? Are you shitting me? 2) "Securing the boarder" would go into perpetuity. At least combat operations in Iraq have already ended. 3) Motivated border jumpers will find a way. Kidnaps/murders/lawlessness and extreme poverty are a powerful motivator. 4) You'd probably have to stop the flow of goods between Mexico and the US.

I'm saying you're dumb because you say really stupid things without following their logical conclusions.

 

[Jaskalas]

What usually happens to invaders?

They vote Democrat and Republicans joke of shooting them. :\