Iron Man 2: Disappointing *Some SPOILERS*

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Z

zylander

Platinum Member
Aug 25, 2002
2,501
0
76
Anyone else here see Iron Man 2 yet? Anyone somewhat disappointed with it? I saw it last night at midnight and all I can say is that Im glad I didnt go with my other friends and pay $15 to see it in IMAX. The movie was longer than it needed to be, the first hour was just Tony Stark/Iron Man showboating, lots of "Im Iron Man, who loves me?" And it wasnt until the last half hour that you finally got some action. I also wasnt impressed with the CGI, there were parts in the movie where the Iron Man suit looked too fake.

Overall the movie was somewhat entertaining. What little action there was, was good and there was some good Robert Downey Jr. humor here and there. But it was too slow in the beginning and they wasted too much time with Iron Man showboating and trying to look cool that it took away from the action, hell the final battle with Mickey Rourke ended in ~60 seconds.

Definitely wasnt batter than the first, Im glad I only paid $7.75 to see it. Ill probably watch it again on Blu-Ray.
 
S

SirStev0

Lifer
Nov 13, 2003
10,449
6
81
I liked it. Not as awesome as the first but still pretty great.

The first hour or so was the best part. I think everyone agrees that the final battle seemed a little short.
 
V

V00DOO

Diamond Member
Dec 2, 2000
3,817
2
81
SirStev0 said:
I liked it. Not as awesome as the first but still pretty great.

The first hour or so was the best part. I think everyone agrees that the final battle seemed a little short.
Click to expand...

I almost fell asleep the first hour of the movie.
 
R

Russwinters

Senior member
Jul 31, 2009
409
0
0
I think it was great. I think the main reason things played out slowly is because they are building on a bigger picture. Theres so much depth to the marvel universe that to do it right, it's gonna be a ton of movies. They already have Sam L signed for like 9 movies as nick fury. That tells me they want to go big or go home this time around with the marvel universe.

So overall, this movie is just more build up to greater things (So we hope, if all goes to plan.)
 
G

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
The plot looked really weak in the trailers. But I guess when you consider these are supposed to tie in with each other it can be a bit on the boring side. I didnt think the first one was terribly good either but when you fit it into the overall story. Then it is a good enough movie.
 
Q

Q

Lifer
Jul 21, 2005
12,042
4
81
I actually liked the fact that it wasn't 90% fighting that I thought it'd be. Only really lame part was when War Machine fought Iron Man when he was drunk. The way they introduced that whole section was really cheesy.
 
roguerower

roguerower

Diamond Member
Nov 18, 2004
4,563
0
76
Disappointing? Did you see Scarlett Johansson? That's probably the hottest she's ever looked in a movie!

I liked it, almost more than the first one. I'm one of the people who likes all this plot/character development mumbo jumbo. I equate it to Batman Begins and Dark Knight. Each consecutive movie just keeps building off of each other.
 
Lumathix

Lumathix

Golden Member
Mar 16, 2004
1,686
0
46
zylander said:
Anyone else here see Iron Man 2 yet? Anyone somewhat disappointed with it? I saw it last night at midnight and all I can say is that Im glad I didnt go with my other friends and pay $15 to see it in IMAX. The movie was longer than it needed to be, the first hour was just Tony Stark/Iron Man showboating, lots of "Im Iron Man, who loves me?" And it wasnt until the last half hour that you finally got some action. I also wasnt impressed with the CGI, there were parts in the movie where the Iron Man suit looked too fake.

Overall the movie was somewhat entertaining. What little action there was, was good and there was some good Robert Downey Jr. humor here and there. But it was too slow in the beginning and they wasted too much time with Iron Man showboating and trying to look cool that it took away from the action, hell the final battle with Mickey Rourke ended in ~60 seconds.

Definitely wasnt batter than the first, Im glad I only paid $7.75 to see it. Ill probably watch it again on Blu-Ray.
Click to expand...

Saw it last night.
Liked it.
 
Lumathix

Lumathix

Golden Member
Mar 16, 2004
1,686
0
46
So basically:
1. You paid to see it.
2. You're planning on buying the blue-Ray.

I think that means you liked the movie.....
 
P

PaperclipGod

Banned
Apr 7, 2003
2,021
0
0
Any modern big-budget movie is automatically fail.
Any movie that casts Robert Downey Jr. as anything other than a parody of himself is automatically fail.
Any movie that skips the plot to fit in more CGI retardation is automatically fail.

The Iron Man franchise combines all three errors. Verdict: Death by icepick
 
AznAnarchy99

AznAnarchy99

Lifer
Dec 6, 2004
14,695
117
106
It was a good movie because I wasn't expecting crazy action. I was expecting a buildup to the avengers and I got that. The scene after the credits setting up Thor. The Captain America shield. I actually liked the second half of plot rather than shit blowing up.

My only gripe was how short the final fight against Whiplash was.
 
GodlessAstronomer

GodlessAstronomer

Lifer
Oct 27, 2007
17,009
5
0
PaperclipGod said:
Seriously, the shit that comes out of Hollywood now is like modern art. There's lots of random shit in it to get your attention, but you have no fucking clue what the point is.
Click to expand...
Some of the best movies I have seen recently have been big, modern Hollywood blockbusters. The Dark Knight, Wall-E, Up!, District 9, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, and Avatar. If you didn't think a single one of those was good then you have terrible taste in movies.
 
Dr. Zaus

Dr. Zaus

Lifer
Oct 16, 2008
11,764
347
126
PaperclipGod said:
Any modern big-budget movie is automatically fail.
Any movie that casts Robert Downey Jr. as anything other than a parody of himself is automatically fail.
Any movie that skips the plot to fit in more CGI retardation is automatically fail.

The Iron Man franchise combines all three errors. Verdict: Death by icepick
Click to expand...

Iron man 1 was not only good; it was amazing. I expected shlock and i got self-aware funny.


I loved how often Iron man 2 broke the 4th wall;

though I would have liked it better if there was more in the way of Sherlock-Holmes level bad-ass; like the first movie.

Some of the best movies I have seen recently have been big, modern Hollywood blockbusters. The Dark Knight, Wall-E, Up!, District 9, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, and Avatar. If you didn't think a single one of those was good then you have terrible taste in movies.
Click to expand...
Or you are a pretentious head-in-his-rectum snob who needs to learn to enjoy life.
 
nakedfrog

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
62,065
17,851
136
GodlessAstronomer said:
Some of the best movies I have seen recently have been big, modern Hollywood blockbusters. The Dark Knight, Wall-E, Up!, District 9, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, and Avatar. If you didn't think a single one of those was good then you have terrible taste in movies.
Click to expand...

:lol:
I haven't seen any of those, and doing so isn't particularly high on my to-do list.
I did finally see Zombieland last weekend, that was pretty sweet.
 
Babbles

Babbles

Diamond Member
Jan 4, 2001
8,253
14
81
I just came back from watching it and I throughly enjoyed it. I think the first hour was really good and set the scene for character development.

It somewhat aggravates me when people want nothing but action in movies - that is nothing but a recipe for disaster, or Michael Bay.
 
Quiksilver

Quiksilver

Diamond Member
Jul 3, 2005
4,725
0
71
zylander said:
The movie was longer than it needed to be, the first hour was just Tony Stark/Iron Man showboating, lots of "Im Iron Man, who loves me?" And it wasnt until the last half hour that you finally got some action. I also wasnt impressed with the CGI, there were parts in the movie where the Iron Man suit looked too fake.

Overall the movie was somewhat entertaining. What little action there was, was good and there was some good Robert Downey Jr. humor here and there. But it was too slow in the beginning and they wasted too much time with Iron Man showboating and trying to look cool that it took away from the action, hell the final battle with Mickey Rourke ended in ~60 seconds.
Click to expand...

I disagree with your opinion of it being longer than it need to be. The length to me was just right, it just felt longer due to the numerous dragged out back and forth sequences between Pepper and Tony.

I don't know what your talking about with the CGI though, it looked fine to me; looked just as fine as the first one did.

I will agree with the final battle between Iron Man, Warmachine, and Whiplash was way disappointing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom