Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: DevilsAdvocate
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: shrumpage
Anyway, what is your solution?
Oh, simply back to the "can Do" principle America used to have before Greed above all else.
America has fallen down beyond 20th on the list of available High Speed Access and still falling.
That's the America y'all embrace now, good for you.
The Can Do was because there was a need to get something done. What is the need for high-speed internet access.
10 years ago, high speed for the user was a 56KB dial-up. Most business worked well then (using dial-up as needed and/or setup something with their local Telco as needed) and prospered. The only thing that high-spped access at the user terminus gained was the ability to send out large volumes of data quickly. (video and audio). In the process, efficiency became a lower priority. Large data files are no longer shipped compressed.
Again, why is High Speed Access required for most people. Also, one should look at the population density of the 20 slots above the US.
Excuses excuses, The Pussy's of America, how pathetic. We deserve to be second class.
Do you do anything other than call people names?
With the new second class America, guess not.
Looks like you're proud of being second class though, good for you.
I fought the giant Monopoly, took me 2 years in between really being caugh in the middle of a real Government Conspiracy but I did succeed.
How many in here can say they got called personally from the Giant phone Co telling them after the Phone Compnay appeared on the News because they were caught treating customers as second class citizens and that they installed High Speed access within 3 months.
Maybe I should've been a wuss like the rest of America is now and stayed stuck with dial up while the Millionaires in the next subdivision continue to get high speed access as the line went right by my house.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: shrumpage
Lets see, I gave you a direct challange.
"What is your solution?" I even listed some options, that could have been expanded:
Your only reply was "american can Do", not based on greed.
I gave you two companies that said "can do"
One of those companies succeed, one of them failed. The failed one put a few people i know out of work when it folded, the other company still employees 850 people. Those 850 people are paying taxes, and aren't on the government pay roll, they don't cost you and me a thing.
Explain to what is your SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM OF RURAL INTERNET ACCESS, since apparently the free market can't handle it.
I did explain it but as usual the FLL's in here refuse to see, not surprising. We are all paying for Rural High Speed access, it is on your Bill. Are we getting service from those fees? Of course not.
Would you care to explain what they have been doing with the Billions of dollars for Rural High Speed Access they have been getting all these years???
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: shrumpage
Lets see, I gave you a direct challange.
"What is your solution?" I even listed some options, that could have been expanded:
Your only reply was "american can Do", not based on greed.
I gave you two companies that said "can do"
One of those companies succeed, one of them failed. The failed one put a few people i know out of work when it folded, the other company still employees 850 people. Those 850 people are paying taxes, and aren't on the government pay roll, they don't cost you and me a thing.
Explain to what is your SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM OF RURAL INTERNET ACCESS, since apparently the free market can't handle it.
I did explain it but as usual the FLL's in here refuse to see, not surprising. We are all paying for Rural High Speed access, it is on your Bill. Are we getting service from those fees? Of course not.
Would you care to explain what they have been doing with the Billions of dollars for Rural High Speed Access they have been getting all these years???
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
[Ironically she got into the Internet and chatting and into a different guy into Computers. In fact you can hear and see her everyday on the Internet, quite a celeb she has become.
Originally posted by: DevilsAdvocate
Wow. You are an incredible ass.
You have been asked what your solution to this non-problem is, and all you have done is call people names, and spout various empty platitudes, much like John Kerry did. All he did was say - "I can do better" without explaining his plan.
Originally posted by: bozack
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
[Ironically she got into the Internet and chatting and into a different guy into Computers. In fact you can hear and see her everyday on the Internet, quite a celeb she has become.
Daveo you know the drill, where are the links and where are the pics.....
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: DevilsAdvocate
Wow. You are an incredible ass.
You have been asked what your solution to this non-problem is, and all you have done is call people names, and spout various empty platitudes, much like John Kerry did. All he did was say - "I can do better" without explaining his plan.
Thank you, speaking of calling names, pot meet kettle.
Thank you again. Kerry explained his plan, America prefers to be retardedly Religious instead but hey, the rest of it are stuck with it, for now.
Originally posted by: eigen
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: DevilsAdvocate
Wow. You are an incredible ass.
You have been asked what your solution to this non-problem is, and all you have done is call people names, and spout various empty platitudes, much like John Kerry did. All he did was say - "I can do better" without explaining his plan.
Thank you, speaking of calling names, pot meet kettle.
Thank you again. Kerry explained his plan, America prefers to be retardedly Religious instead but hey, the rest of it are stuck with it, for now.
Are you gonna answer his question or not?
This is why I called you a tard in some other thread.
Before you spout off at me about "FLL" . I supported the Libertarian candidate during the election and definetly am not religous (see sig)
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: eigen
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: DevilsAdvocate
Wow. You are an incredible ass.
You have been asked what your solution to this non-problem is, and all you have done is call people names, and spout various empty platitudes, much like John Kerry did. All he did was say - "I can do better" without explaining his plan.
Thank you, speaking of calling names, pot meet kettle.
Thank you again. Kerry explained his plan, America prefers to be retardedly Religious instead but hey, the rest of it are stuck with it, for now.
Are you gonna answer his question or not?
This is why I called you a tard in some other thread.
Before you spout off at me about "FLL" . I supported the Libertarian candidate during the election and definetly am not religous (see sig)
If you would read you would see I answered his question. I never said I wasn't a "Tard" so your point is???
So your vote for useless, good for you.
Glad you're not a Religious Brainwashee but you didn't do anything to help your Country, boo for you.
Originally posted by: eigen
Any way back on topic.can you point out to me in the above posts a solution to providing internet service to Rural Areas.
soooooooOriginally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: eigen
Any way back on topic.can you point out to me in the above posts a solution to providing internet service to Rural Areas.
You're paying for it.
Again for the reading impaired. make the ones getting the Billions of dollars of your money put the access in. But of course you feel it is OK they get bigger Yachts instead.
Originally posted by: shrumpage
http://www.usatoday.com/money/...rural-phone-fees_x.htm
is this what you complaining about?
'cause if it is, it has abosultely NOTHIGN TO DO WITH INTERNET SERVICE.
Originally posted by: eigen
Originally posted by: shrumpage
http://www.usatoday.com/money/...rural-phone-fees_x.htm
is this what you complaining about?
'cause if it is, it has abosultely NOTHIGN TO DO WITH INTERNET SERVICE.
Awesome link.
Once again the Blue states paying for the red.😀
Screw the rural areas if they cant support a market then so be it.
Originally posted by: eigen
What do you mean by "make". I do feel its okay that they get bigger yachts. It is their right to spend their profits as they see fit.
Anyway my mother lives rurally.She doesnt even have cable near her house.I have seen her phone bill and its not exorbitant.Anyhoo....
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: eigen
What do you mean by "make". I do feel its okay that they get bigger yachts. It is their right to spend their profits as they see fit.
Anyway my mother lives rurally.She doesnt even have cable near her house.I have seen her phone bill and its not exorbitant.Anyhoo....
It is their right to spend their profits as they see fit.
You call a High Speed Rural Internet Access Fee that we all pay for and do not get Rural High Speed Intenet Access out of it a "Profit"???
There you go folks, in black and white the stupidity of the folks voting and running this Country.
That's why we deserve what we are getting, screwed.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: eigen
What do you mean by "make". I do feel its okay that they get bigger yachts. It is their right to spend their profits as they see fit.
Anyway my mother lives rurally.She doesnt even have cable near her house.I have seen her phone bill and its not exorbitant.Anyhoo....
It is their right to spend their profits as they see fit.
You call a High Speed Rural Internet Access Fee that we all pay for and do not get Rural High Speed Intenet Access out of it a "Profit"???
There you go folks, in black and white the stupidity of the folks voting and running this Country.
That's why we deserve what we are getting, screwed.
Originally posted by: ntdz
We are 12th out of 15th in broadband deployment because our country is so large and the landmass is so huge that it's expensive and takes forever to lay the lines and stuff. It's much easier in European countries where it's much smaller land area, etc...
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
2-9-05BellSouth Network Upgrades 4-6Mbps of that will be for DSL (ADSL2+ specifically)
The technology, ADSL2+, will enable download speeds between 4 megabits per second and 6 mbps, and upload speeds from 512 kbps to 768 kbps, BellSouth said.
BellSouth said it may be able to reach 80 percent of the households in its territory with the ADSL2+ technology at a cost of roughly $300 per household.
=================================================
It is a simple upgrade for the DSLAM and to make sure the backhaul to the DSLAM can carry higher bandwidth to and from the DSLAM.
Then the customer upgrades to a ADSL2+ Modem.
I hope to get an Engineering unit to test shortly.
There were some P&N experts saying this would not happen. :roll:
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
2-9-05BellSouth Network Upgrades 4-6Mbps of that will be for DSL (ADSL2+ specifically)
The technology, ADSL2+, will enable download speeds between 4 megabits per second and 6 mbps, and upload speeds from 512 kbps to 768 kbps, BellSouth said.
BellSouth said it may be able to reach 80 percent of the households in its territory with the ADSL2+ technology at a cost of roughly $300 per household.
=================================================
It is a simple upgrade for the DSLAM and to make sure the backhaul to the DSLAM can carry higher bandwidth to and from the DSLAM.
Then the customer upgrades to a ADSL2+ Modem.
I hope to get an Engineering unit to test shortly.
There were some P&N experts saying this would not happen. :roll:
Actually dave I believe the only saying there would not be increased bandwidth for customers in the future, was yourself.
