I took it from a website under the multi-thread title. Sorry that I didn't look it up closely enough. My fault. To correct my mistake, I put in today's Anandtech multithread test result in it's place.
The 4C/4T Ryzen 1300X 3.5 GHz base 3.7 GHz turbo slightly under-performed the very similar 4C/4T Intel 7400 3.0 GHz base 3.5 GHz turbo. That is true even though the 1300X had a slight clock speed advantage. It isn't quite the same clock, but at least it is the same core and thread count.
http://images.anandtech.com/doci/11658/mt_cpu.png
Heck, to be even more fair, the Ryzen 1200X had closer clocks to the Intel 7400, but I won't go there.
Ryzen was close, but still not quite on par on average on the multi-threaded tests. Ryzen just doesn't quite have the same IPC as Kaby Lake. Ryzen's advantages are more cores, more threads, and usually a good value. Intel's advantage is more IPC and sometimes higher clocks.
Do you care to counter with any clock-for-clock and thread-for-thread comparisons of your own?