Just 20% try againRyzen would be just 25% slower in non-avx workloads while consuming 20% less power (maybe?). I think i know the winner.
I don't know if there's a particular reason we don't see this from Toms anymore ~
But I have a feeling Intel won't be pleased if sites like TR include 1700/x in there ~
Pretty sure your efficiency guesstimates don't stack up in the real world, TR might be different so I can't say anything atm about it ~