- Mar 10, 2004
Well, we have seen time and time again that plenty of people will pay for 5% more performance, and many more will pay for 10% more performance.
Yeah. While I like this news and now for sure will wait for this release before I build this leaves a bad aftertaste. You can't just magically release something several month earlier on such short notice. It can only mean one thing. The designs are already finished and validated and only thing left is some minor optimizations and bug fixes + actually start mass production. They for sure would have been sitting on this if it weren't for AMD and Ryzen.Intel pushing up Coffeelake from Q1 2018 to August 2017? Doesn't that seem like Intel has products in the pipeline but has just been sitting on them this whole time?
As fair as i know what we dont know is what the 256bit and 512bit base clocks look like. I think those listed clock speeds and TDP look perfectly reasonable for int/128bit SIMD, then a few 100 off for 256bit workloads and a few 100 more off for 512. Given that the 6136 looks to be the best binned part of the lot and equally binned Zen 16 core would be around a 100 watts TDP in the 3 to 3.3 ghz range.So, who remembers the Skylake-SP specs leak I posted about a month ago? Let's rewind:
Back then some users questioned the veracity of some details, particularly the higher than expected base clocks. Fast forward...
Intel Xeon Gold & Xeon Platinum (Skylake-SP) Listed Online
CPU/Xeon 8180 2.50GHz FC-LGA14 TRAY
CPU/Xeon 8176 2.10GHz FC-LGA14 TRAY
CPU/Xeon 8170 2.10GHz FC-LGA14 TRAY
Intel CPU/Xeon 8168 2.70GHz FC-LGA14 TRAY
Intel CPU/Xeon 8164 2.00GHz FC-LGA14 TRAY
CPU/Xeon 8160 2.10GHz FC-LGA14 TRAY
Intel CPU/Xeon 6152 2.10GHz FC-LGA14 TRAY
Intel CPU/Xeon 6150 2.70GHz FC-LGA14 TRAY
Intel CPU/Xeon 6148 2.40GHz FC-LGA14 TRAY
CPU/Xeon 6142 2.60GHz FC-LGA14 TRAY
CPU/Xeon 6140 2.30GHz FC-LGA14 TRAY
Intel CPU/Xeon 6138 2.00GHz FC-LGA14 TRAY
CPU/Xeon 6136 3.00GHz FC-LGA14 TRAY
CPU/Xeon 6134 3.20GHz FC-LGA14 TRAY
Intel CPU/Xeon 6130 2.10GHz FC-LGA14 TRAY
Intel CPU/Xeon 6126 2.60GHz FC-LGA14 TRAY
Looking at other Xeon CPUs available there, the numbers above are indeed base clocks. Considering they perfectly match the previous leak, I expect the same for the other details (core count, cache and TDP). Xeon Gold 6134/6136 with 18C/36T, 3.0-3.2 GHz (base) and 105-130W TDP is real. Makes me confident about the clock speeds they will be able to reach with the new Skylake-X 12C/24T beast at 130W+ TDP.
http://techreport.com/review/31660/intel-defends-its-process-technology-leadership-at-14nm-and-10nm14nm++ is claimed to offer 25% greater performance at a given power level than the unoptimized 14nm process first used to produce Broadwell and Skylake chips, or as much as 52% less power consumption for the same level of performance. In fact, Intel's projections show that the transistor performance of 14nm++ will actually exceed that of its first generation of 10-nm products.
They're blowing hard alright. If 14nm++ is indeed using 50% less power for same frequency, I can only expect 1.9Ghz base clock for 4.5W TDP mobile chips and also 4Ghz base clock for 45W TDP quads. But the truth is somewhere in the "middle", isn't it?I know this is just Intel blowing it's own horn, but still it seems to bode well for Coffee Lake.
Sure go buy a 24c cpu for gaming, I'll buy a 4-6c and get 40-100% better performance...6, or 8 core CPU are not HEDT anymore and they will essentially be mainstream in just a few short years.
Specially when "the public" knows there are 32core & 64core server chips out there. And decide that they want 24 of them for a gaming platform.
So that is what we will see in just a few short years (4~).
I think I am going to challenge you on that^. These reviewers can't even remotely back up that claim, that the 7700 is the best gaming CPU. I run three different i7 gaming rigs & understand, that for any and every benchmark you will see with a 7700k in it, is with ONLY that benchmark running...!
Unfortunately, that^ is not how Gamers, game..!
So these benchmarks are completely invalid, because they exist in a sterile vacuum. Intel is business, and it's technology is having a hard time reaching the Gamer. I see my 4790k struggling with Battlefield, so much so, that I can't multi-task.
Also, I still am confused as to what Coffee Lake is going to bring? Or what chipset, etc.
I've never been one to be fuddled by Intel's road map & direction, but what a mess all this skylake-x thing is. Intel seems all rash, moving their portfolio around reacting to Ryzen. It is hard to tell rumor from fact. Released dates are getting moved, etc.
Also, sitting here I am having a hard time wrapping my head around Intel's new platform. For me, the 7700 does little over an OC 4790 in games. I am looking for bigger gains if building a new gaming rig. And when I do upgrade/replace that rig, it will be with 8core, or higher.
Is that coffee Lake..?
Yea, I also high doubt the mainstream consumer, enterprise, educational Market will go hex core in that time frame either.
It's a sign for God! June 27th is my BDay, so I will have a couple hundred extra $$s to spend . Now it's really worth waiting!! Thanks Sweepr!BenchLife just confirmed the Skylake-X / Kaby Lake-X news from DigiTimes.
BenchLife: Intel Core™ X-Series Processor Family (Skylake-X and Kaby Lake-X) launching June 26
- New brand for HEDT: Intel Core™ X-Series Processor Family
- May 30: Announcement at Intel's Computex Keynote by Senior Vice President of Client Computing Group (CCG) Navin Shenoy
- Reviews: 12 days later (June 11/12?)
- June 26: Official retail launch date
Curiously unlike DigiTimes they don't mention a different launch date for 12C Skylake-X. According to the image above it will be introduced together with the cheaper options.
Well, maybe that's the reason they went with another round of 14nm chips.They're blowing hard alright. If 14nm++ is indeed using 50% less power for same frequency, I can only expect 1.9Ghz base clock for 4.5W TDP mobile chips and also 4Ghz base clock for 45W TDP quads. But the truth is somewhere in the "middle", isn't it?
I was positively impressed with 14nm+, if they manage a similar jump it seems good enough for me. It's just that those big marketing numbers don't really translate into final silicon power envelope, at least not in the way average Joe would expect.Even if it was 25% less power for the same frequency, it would be great.
Indeed it's very close now, and you're lucky. Sounds like the perfect excuse to buy yourself a birthday present.It's a sign for God! June 27th is my BDay, so I will have a couple hundred extra $$s to spend . Now it's really worth waiting!! Thanks Sweepr!
Only a fool builds a new rig, to play old games....!
Kaby Lake-X will laugh at you!Only a fool builds a new rig, to play old games....!
The multiplayer games I play, already use SMT. And most software houses are building newer engines to make use of 64bit Windows 10 (DX12/Vulkan). Again, I am not building for those current games (my rig plays them), I am building a new gaming rig for the games that are in development & being released over the next 4 years.
Go ahead and buy a 4c in middle of 2017 for gaming. The rest of us will be laughing at you...
That's laptop territory - a Core i3 7100U does ~1GHz@ 0.635V. Using these numbers for estimation of voltages at the 4GHz range is completely wrong.For 14nm++ this is what Intel claims:
From quick unscientific look I get ~30% less power than 14nm+ at 1.0V. Possibly a larger difference at 1.2V because 14nm+ would cross 1.2x active power in the chart while 14nm++ is at ~0.83-0.85x active power.
So considering a regular Core i7-7700 does 3.6-4.2 GHz with 4C/8T at 65W using 14nm+, it's not unreasonable to expect base clocks closer to 4.0 GHz for their top bin 6C/12T Coffee Lake-S part at 95W (14nm++).
FIFY & If you don't really need 6-8 cores, then wait for a six core coffee lake - why waste the money on SKX? ST performance will be higher on CFL.Yeah I would find it really hard to jump on Skylake-X knowing that a 6/12 coffee lake will drop about
a2 months orlater and likely be faster. I keep wondering about the best choice for gaming regarding core count. Truth is, by the time even a single game no longer runs really well on a quad core, all of these 6/8 core chips will be ancient. For me, having 6 or 8 cores is a mental thing and has no real benefit. At least I admit it. Its an obsession. So what should it be then? 8 core Skylake or a slightly faster 6 core coffee lake? Not sure I should ruin the good deal I got with this $360 6800k though. That's a pretty low price and as soon as I sell and buy something else, there goes that good deal right out the window for a likely 10% performance increase. so
By the by, a 10% increase at a 50fps heavily CPU limited scenario would equal a whopping 55fps. Man, not sure if worth.
Depending on the game it could be more than a 10% increase from your 6800k though. Clock speed alone it's going to be 13% faster, have better memory support, and higher IPC. In a best case scenario I wouldn't be surprised to see more in the 20-25% range.Not sure I should ruin the good deal I got with this $360 6800k though. That's a pretty low price and as soon as I sell and buy something else, there goes that good deal right out the window for a likely 10% performance increase. By the by, a 10% increase at a 50fps heavily CPU limited scenario would equal a whopping 55fps. Man, not sure if worth.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|I||Discussion Intel being desperate before M1X launch?||CPUs and Overclocking||6|
|News Intel updated Loihi, and nobody's talking about it (except Dr. Cutress)||CPUs and Overclocking||16|
|News It seems Intel wants to revive Intel Upgrade Service||CPUs and Overclocking||23|
|U||Question I have 25 extra 200 mm Intel wafers||CPUs and Overclocking||15|
|Z||Question Intel Foundry Wins US DoD 'Foundry Eco-System' Business||CPUs and Overclocking||19|
|Discussion Intel being desperate before M1X launch?|
|News Intel updated Loihi, and nobody's talking about it (except Dr. Cutress)|
|News It seems Intel wants to revive Intel Upgrade Service|
|Question I have 25 extra 200 mm Intel wafers|
|Question Intel Foundry Wins US DoD 'Foundry Eco-System' Business|