AtenRa
Lifer
- Feb 2, 2009
- 14,001
- 3,357
- 136
Based on the leaked Roadmaps Coffe Lake-S is scheduled for Q2 2018.
I was specifically talking about Desktop.
Based on the leaked Roadmaps Coffe Lake-S is scheduled for Q2 2018.
Intel has now been on 14nm for a long time, and Kaby Lake seems to have fewer differences compared to Skylake than most recent yearly updates. So my question is, how much is Intel really getting out of the 2nd tock in the new tick-tock-tock model? Isn't the next tick node shrink and design quite far advanced in planning and design anyway? Can they transfer whatever they did with the 2nd tock to the next tick?
Intel has now been on 14nm for a long time, and Kaby Lake seems to have fewer differences compared to Skylake than most recent yearly updates. So my question is, how much is Intel really getting out of the 2nd tock in the new tick-tock-tock model? Isn't the next tick node shrink and design quite far advanced in planning and design anyway? Can they transfer whatever they did with the 2nd tock to the next tick?
Wonder why they don't call it Coffee Lake. @Arachnotronic
If you look though, the 4+2 Coffee Lake-S is ever so slightly bigger than the 4+2 U die. So there may be a minor difference in the CPU core itself or some other reason.
I was specifically talking about Desktop.
It's possible that the IGP changes that Kaby Lake has were simply backported from Cannonlake.
It isn't because Cannonlake is Gen10. Even the media engine doesn't seem to be a Cannonlake version because Intel calls it Gen 9.5.
I was talking about that as well.
And to confuse things even more, there is Coffee Lake-X.What will be the difference between Kaby Lake-X and Kaby Lake-S (i7 7700K)? @Arachnotronic
Will Kaby Lake-X have the IGP removed so the die will be smaller so it will be cheaper to mfg so it will be easier to compete vs. Zen? But 4-cores won't compete against 8-core. So that seems odd. I don't understand KBL-X.
Edit: Okay, I think I get it. KBL-X will support Optane.
I'm not so sure. I think Intel would want to keep at least the media engine and GPU at parity between Coffee Lake and Cannonlake.
The only Desktop Coffelake roadmap i have seen talks about BTS 2018 which is Q3. Mobile Coffeelake roadmap is for Q2 2018.
Because? Do you think it is an issue if Cannonlake gets some improvements to the media engine?
BTS is another hint for an Q2 RTS launch since Kabylake H 4+2 18W with the same BTS label on a Roadmap was scheduled for RTS Q2 2017, although this product has ben cancelled. KBL U 4+2 is scheduled for RTS Q3 and wasn't labeled with BTS, HR instead.
And since the desktop version of H SKUs are typically ready a month or so before mobile, it is consistent with the mobile Roadmap.
RTS is not release and you also havent provided any different Desktop Coffeelake-s roadmap.
We can clearly see from the roadmap bellow that Desktop KabyLake-S (KBL-H) RTS is Q4 2016 but actual Official release of the product is Q1 2017, so Coffeelake RTS may be Q2 2018 but actual release is BTS or Q3 2018.
RTS is not release and you also havent provided any different Desktop Coffeelake-s roadmap.
It'd be weird marketing wise since I'm sure they are all going to be called 8th gen processors. It's already weird enough that they are going to have 2+2 U/Y Cannonlake and a 4+2 U Kaby Lake. Especially if the CNL can clock much higher at 2C and 1C.
Kaby Lake-S RTS was December, and that's exactly when they started selling. Some members on this forum already have their KBL-S.
RTS not for nothing means ready to sell.
RTS is launch/sales start in Intel terms. You haven't provided us with a desktop Roadmap that says Q3 RTS either. I explained to you why it is a hint for Q2 regarding the BTS label. And you can be sure that CFL-H for desktop won't come later than the mobile version, because it is the same version. Mobile should be later in fact because Intel sells the desktop version directly to end consumers whereas the mobile version is shipping to OEMs. The same happens with Kabylake actually.