- Jun 10, 2004
- 14,600
- 6,084
- 136
Is that a liquid chiller like used for aquariums?
That's a Hailea HC-1000a chiller.
Which is a 1650W chiller that costs close to $1000.
There was no problem with cooling, that's for sure.
Is that a liquid chiller like used for aquariums?
How do you know that's the one?That's a Hailea HC-1000a chiller.
Which is a 1650W chiller that costs close to $1000.
There was no problem with cooling, that's for sure.
I'm in the same boat. I've switched back and forth throughout my lifetime between intel/amd as the tides have turned. I was primarily with intel until Zen came along and they finally changed the game completely and made higher core counts/performance affordable. Intel had the ability for years to do this but kept milking the market with tired quad core CPUs. They've lost me and continue to lose me because they're overpriced and I/O gimped. I currently have multiple rigs I do compute workloads on. I still have an intel rig but I do have zen rigs and a TR. Nothing interests me from intel ATM because the price/performance is still ridiculous as is the power util, alphabet soup sockets, and other profit maximizing gimmicks.depends on how deep your pockets are. I jumped into a TR 1950 because it was "relatively" affordable. I got it when amazon had it for 799 tho. If the chip was 2K ... No way! (yeah that rhymed).
I think anything over 800~1K is doable for people with a few buck burning a hole in their pocket, but anything more than that? Even a die hard geek that is relatively well off will start to question it. You start charging 2/3K for a CPU... Suddenly your high end PC is pushing that 5K mark.
I also bought an AMD TR for a statement for having the balls to bring it to reality. If it wasn't for AMD, we would still be looking at a boring 4 core part. Intel keeps missing the boat and golden opportunities. They should have built 16/32 cores long ago for the masses. Just like when they wanted to build cell phone chips, too late... Now they have hobbled together a server chip, rushing it out the door to try to save face. Will be interesting to see how they market it in the 4'th quarter, hopefully they have a motherboard and chipset already in the works for third party manufacturers to start producing.
**don't wanna come off as an AMD fan... I like Intel, this is the FIRST time I've wanted to buy AMD. I also like AMD APU's as well.
The memes are writing themselves as of late.Damn GamersNexus destroys the Intel 5ghz demo.
https://images.anandtech.com/doci/12907/2018-06-06 08.55.00.jpg
Looks like it is an HC-1000B on one of the systems.
1hp = 746 watts, though.
Not sure what they mean with the 1 hp spec.
People thought Intel was releasing a 28 core 5ghz chip? It was pointed out almost immediately that this was a chilled water overclocking setup. The Hailea chiller is not hidden from the reviewers. So why did anyone write that this was a "5ghz" chip?
Here's the presentation recording, starting from the moment they introduce the 28 core chip. Could you point out when exactly they mention this is an overclock?I don't understand why anyone would have thought this was on any sort of normal cooling, though, or wasn't an overclock.
Looking at their website, it looks like the 1000A is 220-240V only. It shows R22 as the iced medium, but the description suggests it's R134a. The manual says R22 for 1000B (R407C/R410A options).https://images.anandtech.com/doci/12907/2018-06-06 08.55.00.jpg
Looks like it is an HC-1000B on one of the systems.
1hp = 746 watts, though.
Not sure what they mean with the 1 hp spec.
Here's the Anandtech story: https://www.anandtech.com/show/12893/intels-28core-5-ghz-cpu-coming-in-q4 . Check out the 3rd paragraph, doesn't sound like they're surprised by the 5GHz number being possible without sub-ambient cooling.People actually believed that Intel suddenly had a 28 core chip than ran all it's cores at 5ghz stock on air? Really?
What prior indication was there that Intel could make such a chip?
The 8700K can't even run 1 core at 5ghz stock.
10nm is basically nowhere to be seen.
So what was this magical chip supposed to be that came out of nowhere with 28 cores at 5ghz on air?
Did you see the video ? (Still think it's going to be:
2.7 Ghz base
4 Ghz FCT
5 Ghz SCT
300W TDP
It's just downright silly that people are complaining about this. Any tech enthusiast should know to take this at face value: Intel showcased a 28-core running at 5GHz. Amazing accomplishment, but of course the base clock will be 2.7GHz not 5GHz. Who would've thought...?People actually believed that Intel suddenly had a 28 core chip than ran all it's cores at 5ghz stock on air? Really?
What prior indication was there that Intel could make such a chip?
The 8700K can't even run 1 core at 5ghz stock.
So what was this magical chip supposed to be that came out of nowhere with 28 cores at 5ghz on air?
Damn GamersNexus destroys the Intel 5ghz demo.
I think you missed the point. Its an existing Xeon highly overclocked, not even a real NEW product. And on a highly modified motherboard, with a water chiller. Will never be a real product like this anytime soon.I like Gamers Nexus, but this is pointless video, in which he keeps telling the same thing all over again at least 10x. And its not even such a big issue.... i mean, even if that chip ran at 3,5GHz turbo max and they sold it at the same price as 7980x last year (obviously hypothetically), why complain? You still get superior product for the same money, even if it cant run at 5GHz, like they just presented. And saying that its just same Skylake-X from last year, just with more cores, but without higher frequencies is not all that impressive - it wont be impressive, only if you cant buy it cheaper than last year. Which probably wont be the case.
I think you missed the point. Its an existing Xeon highly overclocked, not even a real NEW product. And on a highly modified motherboard, with a water chiller. Will never be a real product like this anytime soon.
Regardless of that. They DID use a water chiller, and a spendy one at that, and they used 4 custom fans on the motherboard power regulators.Didn't say anything about 5 Ghz FCT. That would be too much for sure.
So AMD gave you a 32 core beast but they forgot the Cinebench scores this time around. Looks like Intel stole that lunch, at least. But hey, 28 cores at 5GHz is still not impressive.Intel probably knew that AMD had at least 24 cores, I guess they never saw the 32 cores beast coming.
So nobody woke up the giant, instead the giant was caught with it's pants down again.
Conroe part two incoming
Regardless of that. They DID use a water chiller, and a spendy one at that, and they used 4 custom fans on the motherboard power regulators.
This had no basis on a real product, it was a show, and a bad one at that.