• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Discussion Intel Nova Lake in H2-2026: Discussion Threads

Page 69 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Almost nobody needs 52 C with limited membw. Intel is in for a rude awakening if it thinks that halo part will sell buckets.

On the flip side, 4 P + 4 LPE cores is probably not enough in today's market.

The question is, what clocks will Zen 6 hit? If we're talking +10% fmax +8% IPC then overall +20% ST is reasonable. Zen 5 and ARL are basically the same, so Zen 6 should have a 10% or so lead over NVL in ST (assuming NVL fmax is the same as ARL).
 
techjunkie123 said:
Almost nobody needs 52 C with limited membw. Intel is in for a rude awakening if it thinks that halo part will sell buckets.
Click to expand...
They can simply just move the tiles to other part
techjunkie123 said:
On the flip side, 4 P + 4 LPE cores is probably not enough in today's market.
Click to expand...
It's enough for normal people who do office and web browsing and some apps?
techjunkie123 said:
The question is, what clocks will Zen 6 hit? If we're talking +10% fmax +8% IPC then overall +20% ST is reasonable. Zen 5 and ARL are basically the same, so Zen 6 should have a 10% or so lead over NVL in ST (assuming NVL fmax is the same as ARL).
Click to expand...
going to be 10% IPC and 8-10% most likely
 
Doesn't matter much if IPC is only ~10% more than arrow lake in the average bench or application, wait for results in gaming with the big cache tile. After what broadwell and zen got with the extra memory there will be quite the uproar.
 
Kepler_L2 said:
View attachment 138313
No, it's from their own sources
Click to expand...
Sounds more like it's their own interpretation of Jaykihn's tweet.

Wccftech makes a slightly different interpretation of the same tweet:
wccftech.com

Only High-End 900-Series Motherboards Will Support Full Power of Intel's 52-Core Nova Lake CPUs

Intel Nova Lake-S Desktop CPUs with 52 cores will require highest-end 900-series motherboards to display their full performance potential.
wccftech.com wccftech.com
in short:
"Intel Nova Lake 52-Core Desktop CPUs To Display Full Power on Higher-End 900-Series Motherboards, Rest Will Limit Performance & Power"

Could perhaps be that they mean the same thing, but use slightly different wordings. But then what does that HEDT actually mean for NVL-S? Is it just that HEDT motherboards allows higher power to be used for the 52C variant? And you can still run the 52C on non-HEDT motherboards? Or what else does HEDT bring?
 
DrMrLordX said:
Nova Lake-S is allegedly only ~10% faster than Arrow Lake-S in ST. Allegedly. That would not put it ahead of its competition.
Click to expand...
Coyote Cove delivers an 11% INT IPC uplift and a 15% FP uplift over Cougar Cove. The IPC uplift for Arctic Wolf remains unknown.
 
Momoka_ said:
Coyote Cove delivers an 11% INT IPC uplift and a 15% FP uplift over Cougar Cove. The IPC uplift for Arctic Wolf remains unknown.
Click to expand...
Source? that seems low also waiting for this leak to spread on News website only to be re posted again here only than i will believe this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top