Discussion Intel Nova Lake in H2-2026: Discussion Threads

Page 41 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Fjodor2001

Diamond Member
Feb 6, 2010
4,569
730
126
In Cinebench. Why extrapolate, repeatedly, from one single benchmark chart that doesn't represent your workload?

If you expand the benchmark scope what happens? Where does Arrow Lake fall apart? Where does scaling fall apart in general? Not in Cinebench.

That’s the only power scaling test result for MT workloads with these two CPUs that I could find. But if you have other similar ones, please share. Could be interesting to compare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: reb0rn

511

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2024
5,368
4,774
106
I did read that blog. SPEC is sensitive to cache and ARLs L3 has been horrendously bad.

Even 4 Core Skymont beats 4C LNC shame to the P cores Without Skymont ARL would have been dud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MoogleW

511

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2024
5,368
4,774
106
The interesting part is 8c/8t efficiency tie between Z5c and SKT despite node delta and SKT having like 3 times the accessible LLC.
Yeah but the Cache latency is not the same as for node Delta it's N3B it's not a full node better than N4P at best single digit difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MoogleW

511

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2024
5,368
4,774
106
Their fabric/LLC top minds™ have been on a generational run of shatting the bed. Only Allah knows how bad NVL-S bLLC latency will be.
I wonder why they don't have been laid off they need to re organize this team they have been s**ting the bad for so long.
Clearwater Forest has been bottlenecked due to Fabric/L3.
 

511

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2024
5,368
4,774
106
I'm actually hopeful in this respect. If Big Cache technology didn't help a fair deal they'd probably have canned it. But it made it through.
At the same latency at ARL but 4X the cache is still better but the botched L3s have been a issue their cores are not getting fed properly.