Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads

Page 311 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
941
857
106
Wildcat Lake (WCL) Specs

Intel Wildcat Lake (WCL) is upcoming mobile SoC replacing Raptor Lake-U. WCL consists of 2 tiles: compute tile and PCD tile. It is true single die consists of CPU, GPU and NPU that is fabbed by 18-A process. Last time I checked, PCD tile is fabbed by TSMC N6 process. They are connected through UCIe, not D2D; a first from Intel. Expecting launching in Q1 2026.

Intel Raptor Lake UIntel Wildcat Lake 15W?Intel Lunar LakeIntel Panther Lake 4+0+4
Launch DateQ1-2024Q2-2026Q3-2024Q1-2026
ModelIntel 150UIntel Core 7Core Ultra 7 268VCore Ultra 7 365
Dies2223
NodeIntel 7 + ?Intel 18-A + TSMC N6TSMC N3B + N6Intel 18-A + Intel 3 + TSMC N6
CPU2 P-core + 8 E-cores2 P-core + 4 LP E-cores4 P-core + 4 LP E-cores4 P-core + 4 LP E-cores
Threads12688
Max Clock5.4 GHz?5 GHz4.8 GHz
L3 Cache12 MB12 MB12 MB
TDP15 - 55 W15 W ?17 - 37 W25 - 55 W
Memory128-bit LPDDR5-520064-bit LPDDR5128-bit LPDDR5x-8533128-bit LPDDR5x-7467
Size96 GB32 GB128 GB
Bandwidth136 GB/s
GPUIntel GraphicsIntel GraphicsArc 140VIntel Graphics
RTNoNoYESYES
EU / Xe96 EU2 Xe8 Xe4 Xe
Max Clock1.3 GHz?2 GHz2.5 GHz
NPUGNA 3.018 TOPS48 TOPS49 TOPS






PPT1.jpg
PPT2.jpg
PPT3.jpg



As Hot Chips 34 starting this week, Intel will unveil technical information of upcoming Meteor Lake (MTL) and Arrow Lake (ARL), new generation platform after Raptor Lake. Both MTL and ARL represent new direction which Intel will move to multiple chiplets and combine as one SoC platform.

MTL also represents new compute tile that based on Intel 4 process which is based on EUV lithography, a first from Intel. Intel expects to ship MTL mobile SoC in 2023.

ARL will come after MTL so Intel should be shipping it in 2024, that is what Intel roadmap is telling us. ARL compute tile will be manufactured by Intel 20A process, a first from Intel to use GAA transistors called RibbonFET.



LNL-MX.png
 

Attachments

  • PantherLake.png
    PantherLake.png
    283.5 KB · Views: 24,044
  • LNL.png
    LNL.png
    881.8 KB · Views: 25,531
  • INTEL-CORE-100-ULTRA-METEOR-LAKE-OFFCIAL-SLIDE-2.jpg
    INTEL-CORE-100-ULTRA-METEOR-LAKE-OFFCIAL-SLIDE-2.jpg
    181.4 KB · Views: 72,439
  • Clockspeed.png
    Clockspeed.png
    611.8 KB · Views: 72,326
Last edited:

majord

Senior member
Jul 26, 2015
509
711
136
Are there any leaks about Arrow lake uArch details at all yet? I mean, more than just "no HT"
 

Gideon

Platinum Member
Nov 27, 2007
2,044
5,103
136
Jul 27, 2020
28,174
19,217
146
Great. It means Intel is in the PC gaming game for the long haul. Would be stupid to leave these devices orphaned if they stop updating graphics drivers. I hope this shuts up any further rumors of "Intel getting out of GPUs!" from MLID.
 

LightningZ71

Platinum Member
Mar 10, 2017
2,690
3,390
136
Given Intel's past history, them releasing a product means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about how long they will provide driver support for them. This is ESPECIALLY true of iGPU drivers, having launched and abandoned multiple products within 18 months or less in multiple lines. Given the source of the product referenced, it wouldn't shock me if they completely omitted any sort of driver support language from the supply contract for the processors/SoCs to get the absolute cheapest possible price.
 

CouncilorIrissa

Senior member
Jul 28, 2023
786
2,854
106
Looks to be an interesting handheld:

Here's hoping that BMG requires less fiddling to get older games to work.
 

Ghostsonplanets

Senior member
Mar 1, 2024
774
1,228
96
Lunar Lake should be a great Handheld PC SoC. If Intel subsidize them, perhaps they might even enter the eyes of Valve for a possible SteamDeck 2.
 

DavidC1

Platinum Member
Dec 29, 2023
2,171
3,321
106
thanks for that, I should say I meant the Lion Cove uArch specificly ,

IF this is a full architecture overhaul why so little information? Not expecting we'd have a full uAarchitecture detials , but is there no rumors or info to gather from the usual sources, or deeper Speculation?
I don't know why we need it so early on?

I absolutely despised Intel repeating about Tigerlake three times. Once is enough. Release it and be done with it. Everything else can be left to imagination of the speculators.
 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski

Henry swagger

Senior member
Feb 9, 2022
513
313
106
Twitter post removed

Skymont needs 25% to reach m2 and golden gove ipc in int operations.. the goal is close if they can reach 4.8ghz 🤔😀


Profanity is not allowed.


esquared
Anandtech Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:

AMDK11

Senior member
Jul 15, 2019
496
441
136
thanks for that, I should say I meant the Lion Cove uArch specificly ,

IF this is a full architecture overhaul why so little information? Not expecting we'd have a full uAarchitecture detials , but is there no rumors or info to gather from the usual sources, or deeper Speculation?
LionCove Core Diagram1.png
Here you go.
I know I'm repeating myself, but the only sticking point when it comes to LionCove is this unlabeled graphic diagram from Intel. I described it myself and I think some details already say something. It is always more than the data generally available on the Internet about LionCove.

Architecting%20Our%20Next%20Gen%20Power%20Efficient%20Processor_FINAL%20CLEAN-12.png


intel-arch-21-golden-cove-header.png
 
Last edited:

DavidC1

Platinum Member
Dec 29, 2023
2,171
3,321
106
Here you go.
I know I'm repeating myself, but the only sticking point when it comes to LionCove is this unlabeled graphic diagram from Intel. I described it myself and I think some details already say something. It is always more than the data generally available on the Internet about LionCove.
Saying FP/ALU portion increased by 100% is misleading. If anything they put FP in separate ports from the ALUs. However the gain is likely small, because they typically aren't utilized full all the time thus sharing ports reduces transistor count thus die and power. Since CPUs have been forever limited by power, it further reduces the impact. Of course analysis is likely redone every generation.

Also specifically about the Lion Cove+ as some calls it for Lunarlake, some were talking about an extra cache level called L0. So that might be the extra block rather than separated L2 blocks.

I think you're also missing something on the uop width portion with the drastic increase to 14, understandable since Intel said nothing about Lion Cove. It would be nice to see a 30% uarch gain to counter rumored 10% clock loss but many reputable leakers and insiders did not seem to be positive in terms of Lion Cove for performance so the typical 20% figure is likely.

So I'd temper the expectations down a bit. But the Zen 5 guys are also prepared to be disappointed with the latest rumored performance gains lower than high level architectural gains. Maybe both are sandbagging, or maybe both will disappoint.

@Henry swagger Gracemont already beats Skylake in Integer, and it would be a disappointment to see only 16-18% gain since Crestmont is already 4-6% faster. In fact to live up to previous gains, Skymont should be 30% on TOP of Crestmont, and that'll get us to roughly Golden Cove, beating it noticeably in Integer and losing significantly in FP.
 

Dayman1225

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2017
1,160
996
146

Ghostsonplanets

Senior member
Mar 1, 2024
774
1,228
96
Only 30% lower against 7840U certainly isn’t that impressive. Expected much more given it's a specialized part. But at least it's shaping up to be a good enough.

Only 50% faster than MTL-U7 165U is certainly a bit disappointing compared to the 2x expectations. Specially given it's a 1024 ALU part at >=1.5GHz.
 
Last edited: