Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads

Page 815 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
763
719
106
PPT1.jpg
PPT2.jpg
PPT3.jpg



As Hot Chips 34 starting this week, Intel will unveil technical information of upcoming Meteor Lake (MTL) and Arrow Lake (ARL), new generation platform after Raptor Lake. Both MTL and ARL represent new direction which Intel will move to multiple chiplets and combine as one SoC platform.

MTL also represents new compute tile that based on Intel 4 process which is based on EUV lithography, a first from Intel. Intel expects to ship MTL mobile SoC in 2023.

ARL will come after MTL so Intel should be shipping it in 2024, that is what Intel roadmap is telling us. ARL compute tile will be manufactured by Intel 20A process, a first from Intel to use GAA transistors called RibbonFET.



LNL-MX.png

Intel Core Ultra 100 - Meteor Lake

INTEL-CORE-100-ULTRA-METEOR-LAKE-OFFCIAL-SLIDE-2.jpg

As mentioned by Tomshardware, TSMC will manufacture the I/O, SoC, and GPU tiles. That means Intel will manufacture only the CPU and Foveros tiles. (Notably, Intel calls the I/O tile an 'I/O Expander,' hence the IOE moniker.)



Clockspeed.png
 

Attachments

  • PantherLake.png
    PantherLake.png
    283.5 KB · Views: 24,024
  • LNL.png
    LNL.png
    881.8 KB · Views: 25,515
Last edited:

coercitiv

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2014
7,208
16,904
136
Others aren't very intuitive to use.
If you really cared just about efficiency and memory usage, you would have used Ollama, like a true command prompt warrior. The UI and improved design in LM Studio have a time cost attached, and that time cost is partially offset by using a fast development method.

Sounds to me like you're preaching, but you're not practicing.
 
Jul 27, 2020
25,302
17,572
146
Sounds to me like you're preaching, but you're not practicing.
I don't have time to go exploring looking for better options than LM Studio. My being forced to use LM Studio doesn't change the fact that native applications offer the best user experience and there would be a lot more of them on Mac Silicon if it were properly opened up to Linux. Could even thrive as a decent Steam machine.

Mac users are blissfully unaware or maybe deluding themselves that being stuck with MacOS is best for them when in reality, their choices are being limited by a huge corporation and somehow they don't feel angry about it.
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
3,546
4,878
106
I don't have time to go exploring looking for better options than LM Studio. My being forced to use LM Studio doesn't change the fact that native applications offer the best user experience and there would be a lot more of them on Mac Silicon if it were properly opened up to Linux. Could even thrive as a decent Steam machine.

Mac users are blissfully unaware or maybe deluding themselves that being stuck with MacOS is best for them when in reality, their choices are being limited by a huge corporation and somehow they don't feel angry about it.
You don’t even see the irony in what you wrote. No one’s stuck to macOS, there are people in this very thread who use all operating systems.

No one’s stuck or delusional, you yourself make these assumptions and presume it to be true. You bring your opinions on others and say it as fact.
 

Doug S

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2020
3,220
5,546
136
I don't have time to go exploring looking for better options than LM Studio. My being forced to use LM Studio doesn't change the fact that native applications offer the best user experience and there would be a lot more of them on Mac Silicon if it were properly opened up to Linux. Could even thrive as a decent Steam machine.

Mac users are blissfully unaware or maybe deluding themselves that being stuck with MacOS is best for them when in reality, their choices are being limited by a huge corporation and somehow they don't feel angry about it.

Native booting Linux is the least useful of the possible solutions. If you do that you cut yourself off from all the macOS applications, and would have to continually boot between environments. The only people who would truly appreciate that solution are the people who bought a Mac for its raw performance not because it was a "Mac". I doubt that's a significant market, and would be a highly fickle one since it would abandon Apple the moment someone else takes the performance crown.

What's wrong with running it in a VM? That sort of thing is pretty seamless these days, the average person would hardly notice they were running that app inside a VM.

Another better solution would be to port Linux's userspace to run on top of macOS, like Microsoft did with WSL. Not sure that's really worth the effort given how easy it is to spin up a VM, but it is another alternative.

I remember when Apple announced Apple Silicon Macs there were a lot of people claiming how it was going to crater their market because so many people dual boot Windows. Turns out that was never a big market, because it is a real pain in the ass to work that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Io Magnesso

CouncilorIrissa

Senior member
Jul 28, 2023
652
2,528
96
I don't have time to go exploring looking for better options than LM Studio. My being forced to use LM Studio doesn't change the fact that native applications offer the best user experience and there would be a lot more of them on Mac Silicon if it were properly opened up to Linux. Could even thrive as a decent Steam machine.
The choice isn't between a native app vs a React Native app. The choice is between a React Native app and no app.
 

moinmoin

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2017
5,221
8,408
136
Another better solution would be to port Linux's userspace to run on top of macOS, like Microsoft did with WSL.
That's silly. macOS already has been Unix based since the move to X/NextStep. A Mac user is a brew install away from most Linux CLI applications. That's one major reason why Macs are popular with web developers. WSL was actually Microsoft catching up with that after 15 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dacostafilipe

Io Magnesso

Member
Jun 12, 2025
149
53
56
That's silly. macOS already has been Unix based since the move to X/NextStep. A Mac user is a brew install away from most Linux CLI applications. That's one major reason why Macs are popular with web developers. WSL was actually Microsoft catching up with that after 15 years.
Homebrew is just a package manager after all
The Linux package doesn't work when you install Homebrew
Only software made in accordance with POSIX is compatible with Linux
 

moinmoin

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2017
5,221
8,408
136
Homebrew is just a package manager after all
The Linux package doesn't work when you install Homebrew
Only software made in accordance with POSIX is compatible with Linux
What's a "Linux package"? There are plenty different package managers for different Linux distributions. What does it matter whether homebrew is "just" a package manager as well?

Point is you can install and run plenty CLI applications under Linux, Darwin (macOS) and other UNIX based systems. Windows wasn't among them before WSL.
 

Io Magnesso

Member
Jun 12, 2025
149
53
56
What's a "Linux package"? There are plenty different package managers for different Linux distributions. What does it matter whether homebrew is "just" a package manager as well?

Point is you can install and run plenty CLI applications under Linux, Darwin (macOS) and other UNIX based systems. Windows wasn't among them before WSL.
?
Certainly, the number may be smaller than the Unix OS. but Windows also had multiple CLI applications prior to the launch of WSL
I guess it depends on the human interpretation...