Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads

Page 133 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
789
757
106
PPT1.jpg
PPT2.jpg
PPT3.jpg



As Hot Chips 34 starting this week, Intel will unveil technical information of upcoming Meteor Lake (MTL) and Arrow Lake (ARL), new generation platform after Raptor Lake. Both MTL and ARL represent new direction which Intel will move to multiple chiplets and combine as one SoC platform.

MTL also represents new compute tile that based on Intel 4 process which is based on EUV lithography, a first from Intel. Intel expects to ship MTL mobile SoC in 2023.

ARL will come after MTL so Intel should be shipping it in 2024, that is what Intel roadmap is telling us. ARL compute tile will be manufactured by Intel 20A process, a first from Intel to use GAA transistors called RibbonFET.



LNL-MX.png

Intel Core Ultra 100 - Meteor Lake

INTEL-CORE-100-ULTRA-METEOR-LAKE-OFFCIAL-SLIDE-2.jpg

As mentioned by Tomshardware, TSMC will manufacture the I/O, SoC, and GPU tiles. That means Intel will manufacture only the CPU and Foveros tiles. (Notably, Intel calls the I/O tile an 'I/O Expander,' hence the IOE moniker.)



Clockspeed.png
 

Attachments

  • PantherLake.png
    PantherLake.png
    283.5 KB · Views: 24,025
  • LNL.png
    LNL.png
    881.8 KB · Views: 25,517
Last edited:

TESKATLIPOKA

Platinum Member
May 1, 2020
2,696
3,260
136
This is a special binned and tuned model for handheld only. In a regular notebook most OEMs go for performance to gain just a few percent which require 20-40W more power, although I would expect a handheld OEM even with a regular SKU won't be so crazy.
This is still Phoenix APU.
Even If we talked about 7940HS limited to 35W, I don't think It would be that much worse, but you would need to use 6400mbps LPDDR5x instead of 5600mbps DDR5.

Meteor lake GT2 has an advantage in 33% more compute units, It should help a lot.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97

TESKATLIPOKA

Platinum Member
May 1, 2020
2,696
3,260
136
Videocardz
INTEL-METEOR-LAKE-HERO-BANNER-1-1200x521.jpg
METOER-LAKE-U9-U15-SKU.png


164U and 134U is the 9W version. I won't bother commenting the naming scheme. :(
 

cebri1

Senior member
Jun 13, 2019
373
405
136
Naming is so confusing, everything being Core Ultra doesn't make much sense. Wouldn't it be better to call the top line (old i9 and i7) Ultra, only Core the mid line and something like Core Lite the low end?

Intel Core Ultra 1900M
Intel Core 1500M
Intel Core Lite 1100M

Also remove the H,S, the U, etc. One of the numbers can be used to indicate power envelope in mobile devices (maybe the last one, and the previous to indicate type of iGPU from 0 to 5 (max XE units).

Intel Core Ultra 1955M (best GPU (max execution units at top TDP), max TDP of the line)
Intel Core 1553M (max execution units running at lower frequencies)
Intel Core Lite 1121M

Of course you could simplify a lot by reducing the number of SKUs but at least it gives clear information. Desktop should be much easier.

Intel Core Ultra 1950K
Intel Core Ultra 1700K (without iGPU)
Intel Core 1550
Intel Core Lite 1050 (all e cores + full iGPU)

my 2c.
 
Jul 27, 2020
26,635
18,338
146
Get rid of numbers altogether. Adopt animal names. Specifically kitties.

Core Ultra Lion 2023 (MT beast)
Core Ultra Cheetah 2023 (ST champion)
Core Ultra Felix Rex 2023 (well rounded cat that shreds whatever it encounters without burning too much power)
Core Ultra Itty Bitty KItty 2023 (keeps going and going and going yet not dog gone slow)

Now they can do this for the next 20 years without having to worry about branding. Just change the year whenever the new launch happens.

EDIT: funny thing. SD knows what Felix Rex looks like!

 
Last edited:

Joe NYC

Diamond Member
Jun 26, 2021
3,387
4,979
136
Naming is so confusing, everything being Core Ultra doesn't make much sense. Wouldn't it be better to call the top line (old i9 and i7) Ultra, only Core the mid line and something like Core Lite the low end?

Intel Core Ultra 1900M
Intel Core 1500M
Intel Core Lite 1100M

Also remove the H,S, the U, etc. One of the numbers can be used to indicate power envelope in mobile devices (maybe the last one, and the previous to indicate type of iGPU from 0 to 5 (max XE units).

Intel Core Ultra 1955M (best GPU (max execution units at top TDP), max TDP of the line)
Intel Core 1553M (max execution units running at lower frequencies)
Intel Core Lite 1121M

Of course you could simplify a lot by reducing the number of SKUs but at least it gives clear information. Desktop should be much easier.

Intel Core Ultra 1950K
Intel Core Ultra 1700K (without iGPU)
Intel Core 1550
Intel Core Lite 1050 (all e cores + full iGPU)

my 2c.
If anything is confusing, then Intel will just have to pony up more $$$ to "influencers" to explain it to us...

As far as Ultra, am I the only person for whom there is a name association with Michelob Ultra, which is literally the worst beer on the planet?
 

eek2121

Diamond Member
Aug 2, 2005
3,392
5,024
136
Naming is so confusing, everything being Core Ultra doesn't make much sense. Wouldn't it be better to call the top line (old i9 and i7) Ultra, only Core the mid line and something like Core Lite the low end?

Intel Core Ultra 1900M
Intel Core 1500M
Intel Core Lite 1100M

Also remove the H,S, the U, etc. One of the numbers can be used to indicate power envelope in mobile devices (maybe the last one, and the previous to indicate type of iGPU from 0 to 5 (max XE units).

Intel Core Ultra 1955M (best GPU (max execution units at top TDP), max TDP of the line)
Intel Core 1553M (max execution units running at lower frequencies)
Intel Core Lite 1121M

Of course you could simplify a lot by reducing the number of SKUs but at least it gives clear information. Desktop should be much easier.

Intel Core Ultra 1950K
Intel Core Ultra 1700K (without iGPU)
Intel Core 1550
Intel Core Lite 1050 (all e cores + full iGPU)

my 2c.
Intel is missing an opportunity to completely rebrand IMO. Everything more efficient than Raptor Lake refresh could have been named something new.
Any info on MTL's power usage? It's kinda frustrating when Intel is keeping it a closely guarded secret.

Why so much secrecy?
Because they took a P-Die and turned it into an H-die and clocked it to the moon, driving up power consumption. It will be more efficient than Raptor Lake/Refresh, but how much is anyone’s guess.

The 9-15W segments will be interesting assuming Intel doesn’t end up with the same power issues as AMD’s chiplet designs have.

I am actually excited for Meteor Lake. It is basically slightly improved Raptor Lake at lower power. There are some slight regressions due to latency changes, but overall it provides a small increase in performance while providing a decent decrease in power consumption.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,945
4,536
126
Any info on MTL's power usage? It's kinda frustrating when Intel is keeping it a closely guarded secret.

Why so much secrecy?
Intel recently demoed gaming at just under 30 W.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek

SiliconFly

Golden Member
Mar 10, 2023
1,924
1,284
106
Intel recently demoed gaming at just under 30 W.
You mean the CPU tile & the GPU tile combined draws under 30W? Something doesn't add up. :openmouth:

When the cpu tile & the gpu tile are running full steam, shouldn't the MTL package draw more than 50W?
 

TESKATLIPOKA

Platinum Member
May 1, 2020
2,696
3,260
136
You mean the CPU tile & the GPU tile combined draws under 30W? Something doesn't add up. :openmouth:

When the cpu tile & the gpu tile are running full steam, shouldn't the MTL package draw more than 50W?
What doesn't add up?
If you limit TDP to 30W, then of course It won't draw 50W.
 

H433x0n

Golden Member
Mar 15, 2023
1,224
1,606
106
Maybe thats the reason they didn't show the actual FPS
It’s still pre-release. If they showed the FPS it’d be essentially spoiling the MTL iGPU perf before December 14th.

That being said, I doubt it’s high refresh rate gaming. Based on A380 perf, it’s probably ~30fps or so.
 

HoveringStyle

Junior Member
Dec 11, 2022
22
26
51
Because they took a P-Die and turned it into an H-die and clocked it to the moon

There was no such thing as a P-die, only the H series 6P/8E die and the U-series 2P/8E die, P-series chips are basically just better binned H-series i5s with a power limit and didn't perform any better than a fully enabled H chip at the same "TDP".

In all their presentations of Meteor Lake so far Intel has only showed comparisons at 28W, that, coupled with the complete lack of leaks of Meteor Lake P could suggest they abandoned that branding, and the H suffix might now mean 28W rather than 45W.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and mikk
Jul 27, 2020
26,635
18,338
146

I hope at least ASUS has one Core Ultra 9 laptop available for reviews on December 14. It would suck to wait even more to find out what the best MTL chip can do.
 

cebri1

Senior member
Jun 13, 2019
373
405
136

I hope at least ASUS has one Core Ultra 9 laptop available for reviews on December 14. It would suck to wait even more to find out what the best MTL chip can do.

If the difference is only frequency, cannot be that hard to extrapolate I imagine.
 

SiliconFly

Golden Member
Mar 10, 2023
1,924
1,284
106

I hope at least ASUS has one Core Ultra 9 laptop available for reviews on December 14. It would suck to wait even more to find out what the best MTL chip can do.
Well, MTL is not about performance for sure. I think someone leaked geekbench score of an MTL ES or QS and it wasn't very impressive. Don't remember the details though. On an average, we can expect performance to be marginally better than previous gen at best.

The MTL iGPU is also equivalent to A370M. Which puts it in 1650 Ti territory (with added RT). Not bad for an iGPU and definitely a solid improvement. Not entirely sufficient when it comes to real gaming, but a wonderful addition for casual gamers/average users.

The real exciting thing in MTL is the efficiency, but the idiots at Intel are still keeping it under wraps. Sad.