Intel gonna be the new gamers choice?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: fliguy84
Rahul Sood (Voodoo PC owner) has something interesting to say about this matter

http://voodoopc.blogspot.com/2006/03/if...ad-time-machine.html?www.dailytech.com

:D

They re-ran the tests, the entire blog was debunked, short of the fact that its a very early preview.

The hilarious part was the conroe was running on the wrong memory timings, and gained more from the retest than the FX did from the new bios (the bios update did basically nothing).
 

ronnn

Diamond Member
May 22, 2003
3,918
0
71
Impressive and likely not cheap. Now if Ati showcased a card not to be for sale for at least three months ... the response would be quite different. :beer:
 

ZimZum

Golden Member
Aug 2, 2001
1,281
0
76
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: fliguy84
Rahul Sood (Voodoo PC owner) has something interesting to say about this matter

http://voodoopc.blogspot.com/2006/03/if...ad-time-machine.html?www.dailytech.com

:D

They re-ran the tests, the entire blog was debunked, short of the fact that its a very early preview.

The hilarious part was the conroe was running on the wrong memory timings, and gained more from the retest than the FX did from the new bios (the bios update did basically nothing).

Doh, so much for that. People with similar AMD setups on on other forums have run the same benchies Intel did and got similar results. The fact is, in the comparison they are actually painting AMD in the best light possible. Comparing an overclocked FX60 to a Conroe running at stock.

The most shocking part of this is the Conroe Pricing. Which, if it holds true will mean Intel will have not only the highest performing CPU but it will be cheaper than AMDs offerings. Which in turn will assuredly force AMD to drive down prices. Thats the great thing about competition.

edited for spelling
 

Darkon

Junior Member
Sep 15, 2004
13
0
0
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
I believe IBM said there will be Cell blade series servers, but that's about it?

cell is worthless for general computing
Your response is somewhat muddled to me. Are you confirming that specific server type tasking is where Cell will stop?

Cell has a lot of limiting factors sony doesnt talk about. The DSPs suck at everything but fixed functions. It only does in order execution, and all the cores have off die cache...


What on earth are you talking about spe's aren?t DSP's you can do pretty much anything with them except run a sophisticated modern OS like Tiger OS x and no cell doesn't have off die cache

 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: Darkon
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
I believe IBM said there will be Cell blade series servers, but that's about it?

cell is worthless for general computing
Your response is somewhat muddled to me. Are you confirming that specific server type tasking is where Cell will stop?

Cell has a lot of limiting factors sony doesnt talk about. The DSPs suck at everything but fixed functions. It only does in order execution, and all the cores have off die cache...


What on earth are you talking about spe's aren?t DSP's you can do pretty much anything with them except run a sophisticated modern OS like Tiger OS x and no cell doesn't have off die cache

uhh yeah, it does have off die cache.

in order execution is a massive performance hit.

as for the SPEs, please detail what they can do besides decode indvidual streams of data, being in order processors they cant even use more than one SPE for the same task.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: ZimZum
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: fliguy84
Rahul Sood (Voodoo PC owner) has something interesting to say about this matter

http://voodoopc.blogspot.com/2006/03/if...ad-time-machine.html?www.dailytech.com

:D

They re-ran the tests, the entire blog was debunked, short of the fact that its a very early preview.

The hilarious part was the conroe was running on the wrong memory timings, and gained more from the retest than the FX did from the new bios (the bios update did basically nothing).

Doh, so much for that. People with similar AMD setups on on other forums have run the same benchies Intel did and got familiar results. The fact is, in the comparison they are actually painting AMD in the best light possible. Comparing an overclocked FX60 to a Conroe running at stock.

The most shocking part of this is the Conroe Pricing. Which, if it holds true will mean Intel will have not only the highest performing CPU but it will be cheaper than AMDs offerings. Which in turn will assuredly force AMD to drive down prices. Thats the great thing about competition.

I am very excited about the pricing myself, especiallly if they overclock well.
 
Jun 14, 2003
10,442
0
0
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: Darkon
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
I believe IBM said there will be Cell blade series servers, but that's about it?

cell is worthless for general computing
Your response is somewhat muddled to me. Are you confirming that specific server type tasking is where Cell will stop?

Cell has a lot of limiting factors sony doesnt talk about. The DSPs suck at everything but fixed functions. It only does in order execution, and all the cores have off die cache...


What on earth are you talking about spe's aren?t DSP's you can do pretty much anything with them except run a sophisticated modern OS like Tiger OS x and no cell doesn't have off die cache

uhh yeah, it does have off die cache.

in order execution is a massive performance hit.

as for the SPEs, please detail what they can do besides decode indvidual streams of data, being in order processors they cant even use more than one SPE for the same task.


nah it doesnt, the main cpu has access to the cache as a normal cpu would, on die, but the SPE's for some reason arent wired directly to the cache and have to go a longer way round...
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,880
32,058
146
BTW, Conroe revisited Anand applied the new bios, fixed some stuff he borked in testing and reran some benchies, Conroe still the clear winnar, just 20% in F.E.A.R. instead of 41%. Those questioning the benchies were right, but the bios was a non-factor so STFU about that :p
 

Darkon

Junior Member
Sep 15, 2004
13
0
0
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: Darkon
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
I believe IBM said there will be Cell blade series servers, but that's about it?

cell is worthless for general computing
Your response is somewhat muddled to me. Are you confirming that specific server type tasking is where Cell will stop?

Cell has a lot of limiting factors sony doesnt talk about. The DSPs suck at everything but fixed functions. It only does in order execution, and all the cores have off die cache...


What on earth are you talking about spe's aren?t DSP's you can do pretty much anything with them except run a sophisticated modern OS like Tiger OS x and no cell doesn't have off die cache

uhh yeah, it does have off die cache.

in order execution is a massive performance hit.

as for the SPEs, please detail what they can do besides decode indvidual streams of data, being in order processors they cant even use more than one SPE for the same task.


nah it doesnt, the main cpu has access to the cache as a normal cpu would, on die, but the SPE's for some reason arent wired directly to the cache and have to go a longer way round...
They don't have to go longer way spe's have there own 256 kb of sram available which act's as a cache
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: Darkon
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
I believe IBM said there will be Cell blade series servers, but that's about it?

cell is worthless for general computing
Your response is somewhat muddled to me. Are you confirming that specific server type tasking is where Cell will stop?

Cell has a lot of limiting factors sony doesnt talk about. The DSPs suck at everything but fixed functions. It only does in order execution, and all the cores have off die cache...


What on earth are you talking about spe's aren?t DSP's you can do pretty much anything with them except run a sophisticated modern OS like Tiger OS x and no cell doesn't have off die cache

uhh yeah, it does have off die cache.

in order execution is a massive performance hit.

as for the SPEs, please detail what they can do besides decode indvidual streams of data, being in order processors they cant even use more than one SPE for the same task.


nah it doesnt, the main cpu has access to the cache as a normal cpu would, on die, but the SPE's for some reason arent wired directly to the cache and have to go a longer way round...

Cell article (old)

Cell is basically one SMT enabled power PC core, and the 8 SPEs are for floating point calculations, not integer.

Although i do stand corrected on the cache, 256kb available per core on die. Another old article i read indicated the cache was on package, not on die.

although im laughing pretty hard at this massive core doing 4.5ghz at 30w.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: Darkon
Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: Darkon
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
I believe IBM said there will be Cell blade series servers, but that's about it?

cell is worthless for general computing
Your response is somewhat muddled to me. Are you confirming that specific server type tasking is where Cell will stop?

Cell has a lot of limiting factors sony doesnt talk about. The DSPs suck at everything but fixed functions. It only does in order execution, and all the cores have off die cache...


What on earth are you talking about spe's aren?t DSP's you can do pretty much anything with them except run a sophisticated modern OS like Tiger OS x and no cell doesn't have off die cache

uhh yeah, it does have off die cache.

in order execution is a massive performance hit.

as for the SPEs, please detail what they can do besides decode indvidual streams of data, being in order processors they cant even use more than one SPE for the same task.


nah it doesnt, the main cpu has access to the cache as a normal cpu would, on die, but the SPE's for some reason arent wired directly to the cache and have to go a longer way round...
They don't have to go longer way spe's have there own 256 kb of sram available which act's as a cache

It my understanding that this only acts an L1 cache and the L2 cache is shared among the 8 SPEs and the power PC core.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,211
50
91
FEAR benches look much more in line to the rest of the gaming benches. And still lands 20% faster with a mainstream Conroe. BIOS update had nil effect.
And a hush falls over the crowd. I'm sure they are hard at work finding other things to pick apart. I'm very glad Anandtech revisited this. They addressed all the complaints of the AMD boyz. The only thing that needs to be done now, is to do the very same testing on the RD580 mobo (with latest BIOS LOL). Somehow, I don't think things will improve anywhere near enough to even get close to the Mainstream Conroe.

Very exciting indeed.
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
FEAR benches look much more in line to the rest of the gaming benches. And still lands 20% faster with a mainstream Conroe. BIOS update had nil effect.
And a hush falls over the crowd. I'm sure they are hard at work finding other things to pick apart. I'm very glad Anandtech revisited this. They addressed all the complaints of the AMD boyz. The only thing that needs to be done now, is to do the very same testing on the RD580 mobo (with latest BIOS LOL). Somehow, I don't think things will improve anywhere near enough to even get close to the Mainstream Conroe.

Very exciting indeed.

totally agreed

and finally we will see reasonably priced AMD CPUs [for a change]
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
FEAR benches look much more in line to the rest of the gaming benches. And still lands 20% faster with a mainstream Conroe. BIOS update had nil effect.
And a hush falls over the crowd. I'm sure they are hard at work finding other things to pick apart. I'm very glad Anandtech revisited this. They addressed all the complaints of the AMD boyz. The only thing that needs to be done now, is to do the very same testing on the RD580 mobo (with latest BIOS LOL). Somehow, I don't think things will improve anywhere near enough to even get close to the Mainstream Conroe.

Very exciting indeed.

totally agreed

and finally we will see reasonably priced AMD CPUs [for a change]

I want to see the days of $200 high end chips again :)