randomhero
Member
- Apr 28, 2020
- 180
- 247
- 86
Cheers!Early October, but yea its later than most of us expected.
Must have mixed up something.
Cheers!Early October, but yea its later than most of us expected.
if AMD really wanted to im sure they could do 4x50u SKU's and let a single core use upto max SOC draw for the different durations and then they would have ~4.7ghz single core clocks to really rub the salt in.Pricing will make or break Tiger Lake, the rest is fine but nothing extraordinary. Which leads us to 10SF yields, they better be excellent, otherwise Intel won't be able to flood the market with cheap i3 and i5 chips.
The biggest problem TGL faces is i7 compares much more favorable versus 4800U than i5 and i3 do versus 4700U and 4500U respectively. On TGL there's a steep drop in ST clocks in lower SKUs, meanwhile AMD SKUs have minimal drops since differentiation is done via lower thread count. The end result is the i3 with 4C/8T and 3.7GHz boost looks great on paper until you pit it against the 4500U with 6C/6T and 4Ghz boost. That makes the two CPUs comparable in ST performance, while the 4500U likely still wins in MT loads... and may actually start to win in GPU loads as well.
If yields are still mediocre then TGL will be more expensive than Renoir (price will be bound by availability), so Intel will be forced to compete based on premium exclusive features such as Thunderbolt, 90Hz HDR screens, fast charging, premium design and materials. That will be moderately fine for the i7, but problematic for the rest of the lineup.
That doesn't really change the equation, as they would also need significant volume for these highly binned parts. All that really matters is manufacturing speed right now. Chop chop!if AMD really wanted to im sure they could do 4x50u SKU's and let a single core use upto max SOC draw for the different durations and then they would have ~4.7ghz single core clocks to really rub the salt in.
I don't think they would need to bin they have that much head room currently.That doesn't really change the equation, as they would also need significant volume for these highly binned parts. All that really matters is manufacturing speed right now. Chop chop!
Both 4700G and 3600XT boost to 4.4Ghz. Why not let them boost to 4.7Ghz? The 3600XT could definitely have used higher clocks over 3600X to justify the price premium and desktop CPUs don't even have a ST boost power budget, it's all about temps.I don't think they would need to bin they have that much head room currently.
If yields are still mediocre then TGL will be more expensive than Renoir (price will be bound by availability
The biggest problem TGL faces is i7 compares much more favorable versus 4800U than i5 and i3 do versus 4700U and 4500U respectively.
4800U is quite hard to find, but it's PRO analog, 4750U, is more freely attainable (though only on Lenovo devices thus-far)4800U is basically unavailable, we will see how the availability looks like for the i7-1185G7. However the comparison for the i7-1165G7 is a better one, unlike AMD there is no CPU threads/GPU core downgrade, it's just a slightly lower clocked version of i7-1185G7.
That's what marketing tells us, market reality is different.i7 compares to 4700U.
4800U is becoming available, I can buy the Lenovo Slim 7 and Ideapad 5 with 4800U from several stores in my country (eastern EU).4800U is basically unavailable, we will see how the availability looks like for the i7-1185G7. However the comparison for the i7-1165G7 is a better one, unlike AMD there is no CPU threads/GPU core downgrade, it's just a slightly lower clocked version of i7-1185G7.
That's what marketing tells us, market reality is different.
4800U is becoming available, I can buy the Lenovo Slim 7 and Ideapad 5 with 4800U from several stores in my country (eastern EU).
As long as shop prices tell me a different story, I don't care what AMD and/or Intel marketing are telling me: the 4700U is directly competing with i5 Ice Lake chips in pricing. If Tiger Lake comes with more aggressive price tags then great, that's what my previous posts were about: pricing will be paramount for TGL i5 and i3.It's not only about marketing, I mean these two are the top SKUs.
Yeah, I'm sure Intel is laughing their ass off.9 months after Renoir launch 2 devices, sorry this is a joke.
It depends on when it will land. If they can push it out soon I can see it still launching. Otherwise...Even Rocket Lake-S? That would be a fiasco.
Pricing will make or break Tiger Lake, the rest is fine but nothing extraordinary. Which leads us to 10SF yields, they better be excellent, otherwise Intel won't be able to flood the market with cheap i3 and i5 chips.
The biggest problem TGL faces is i7 compares much more favorable versus 4800U than i5 and i3 do versus 4700U and 4500U respectively. On TGL there's a steep drop in ST clocks in lower SKUs, meanwhile AMD SKUs have minimal drops since differentiation is done via lower thread count. The end result is the i3 with 4C/8T and 3.7GHz boost looks great on paper until you pit it against the 4500U with 6C/6T and 4Ghz boost. That makes the two CPUs comparable in ST performance, while the 4500U likely still wins in MT loads... and may actually start to win in GPU loads as well.
If yields are still mediocre then TGL will be more expensive than Renoir (price will be bound by availability), so Intel will be forced to compete based on premium exclusive features such as Thunderbolt, 90Hz HDR screens, fast charging, premium design and materials. That will be moderately fine for the i7, but problematic for the rest of the lineup.
Renoir will be replaced soon, so I doubt AMD cares all that much. Zen 3 chips should bring a similar uplift to Ryzen compared to what TGL did over Skylake based parts, so AMD will soon find themselves beating Intel again.Both 4700G and 3600XT boost to 4.4Ghz. Why not let them boost to 4.7Ghz? The 3600XT could definitely have used higher clocks over 3600X to justify the price premium and desktop CPUs don't even have a ST boost power budget, it's all about temps.
Later edit: anyway, I think we can further discuss Renoir clocks in the more appropriate thread, in here we might as well acknowledge TGL looks very good in the high end but may have a weaker value segment. A cheap i3 with 4C/8T could be very strong though.
It depends on when it will land. If they can push it out soon I can see it still launching. Otherwise...
Fab capacity or 10 nm yields are still poor?It depends on when it will land. If they can push it out soon I can see it still launching. Otherwise...
My gut tells me that Intel has their 10nm stuff figured out, and now they are beginning to migrate over. I speculate that the only reason we aren’t getting 8-core TGL is fab capacity.
Fab capacity or 10 nm yields are still poor?
EDIT: I thought you were referring to Tiger Lake.
Could be both. Two things we don't know: how many of Intel's fabs are still cranking out 10nm+ for IceLake-SP, and how many are moving/have moved to 10SF for TigerLake/Alder Lake/Sapphire Rapids. We also don't know what retooling (or how much) has to be done to produce TigerLake etc. versus anything on 10nm+.
One would think we would be hearing more about IceLake-SP if it was still launching this year.
My gut tells me that Intel has their 10nm stuff figured out, and now they are beginning to migrate over. I speculate that the only reason we aren’t getting 8-core TGL is fab capacity.
I thought we are getting 8 core TGL in Q1 2021. At least there are rumors about it.
You would think so. We've seen some samples in the wild via Geekbench 5 but not much else. If it doesn't launch this year, it may as well not launch at all.