@DrMrLordX If Rocketlake is early 2021, then they'll still have the perf/clock lead.
Rocketlake-S with Willow Cove only needs about 4GHz to outperform Coffeelake in single threaded workloads, because 5GHz is an unrealistic frequency target, and the point where the power and thermal levels run out of control. They somehow made a Netburst chip again with CFL.
If you go through NBC data, you'll see 1065G7 reaching its 3.9GHz max clock readily, while Cometlake falls 100-200MHz short of the 4.7-4.8GHz top clock.
At ultra low power levels, Amberlake even fails to reach a much more conservative 4.2GHz level. Amberlake with 600MHz advantage fails to outperform Kabylake-Y in Cinebench ST! HWInfo shows that it can reach 4.2GHz, but benchmark results tell us its extremely easy to dislodge off its peak clock, and by a lot. So much for 14nm's clock prowess!
At the -Y levels, 10nm chips will easily outperform 14nm chips, because all it has to do is reach the same clock level, and uarch will do the rest.
Ultimately though, Intel should go back down to the 4GHz level, and AMD should continue to do what they are doing, and not reach 5GHz as some are suggesting. Intel had to because they had no choice. They deserved it, because they put in the work. But its a bad way to go about things. 3 years for 300MHz. A single architecture advance of 10% would have obliterated all that.