It's more like 1.3X Chip densit so about 0.76xIt's an N3 freebie deal. Like .66x chip scaling means you get to stuff more cores while maintaining the same ~70-80mm^2 CCD area.
It's more like 1.3X Chip densit so about 0.76xIt's an N3 freebie deal. Like .66x chip scaling means you get to stuff more cores while maintaining the same ~70-80mm^2 CCD area.
More, remember that the CCD has about squat in analog shoreline.It's more like 1.3X Chip densit so about 0.76x
but there is 0 gains in sram for N3P/EMore, remember that the CCD has about squat in analog shoreline.
I would be fine with Intel 3 as wellYou know, that would be nice if Bartlett Lake was fabbed at N3E.
I don't know I just can't seem to get excited about this. Unless the price is amazing you can get 12 more performant Zen 5 cores on a newer, more efficient node.Intel Unveils Bartlett Lake-S CPU Lineup Intended For Edge Applications
source: https://wccftech.com/intel-arrow-lake-s-non-k-desktop-cpus-bartlett-lake-s-cpu-lineup-for-edge/
So is this Raptor Lake Refresh Refresh?
Or should we call it Golden Cove+++
Intel: we're not making these for consumers, Igor. Stop listening to fake leakers and clickbait sites. Over to you, Steve!Rats! How much longer, Intel???
Intel: we're not making these for consumers, Igor. Stop listening to fake leakers and clickbait sites. Over to you, Steve!
They're making them eventually, but their prime purpose will be industrial applications. We may not even see them available for consumers through regular DYI channels, they may end up at OEMs.There have been a few looking for 12+0 Bartlett Lake. Whether that materializes, who knows.
Our of interest - why is that?their prime purpose will be industrial applications
Realtime OSes I suspect. You want performance determinism there. Don't want your expensive robot missing a beat just coz the critical application got scheduled onto an E-core.Our of interest - why is that?
Yes get that, I was wondering more about why specifically 12 core would be that needed, won't 8 cores do just fine?critical application got scheduled onto an E-core.
Yes get that, I was wondering more about why specifically 12 core would be that needed, won't 8 cores do just fine?
Maybe the robots are getting super complex these days. Too many moving parts and calculations.Yes get that, I was wondering more about why specifically 12 core would be that needed, won't 8 cores do just fine?
I don't know I just can't seem to get excited about this. Unless the price is amazing you can get 12 more performant Zen 5 cores on a newer, more efficient node.
So is this Raptor Lake Refresh Refresh?
Or should we call it Golden Cove+++
12 cores 24 threads with Raptor Cove IPC on a single die dream come true. Why max out at 8 cores. The few games that benefit from 16 threads more headroom and ones that go more you got a winner if it actually comes.Maybe the robots are getting super complex these days. Too many moving parts and calculations.
So a 12 core Bartlett Lake is going to be more performant than a 9900X?Yeah but they are dual ccx/ccd which sucks.
If there is really a 12 p core bartlett lake it would be one ring no scheduling issues. It would be awesome and would replace 9800x3d but sadly I do not think it's happening.