• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Indictments coming...

Page 199 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
i doubt this will land an indictment (not even sure what crime if any would have been committed), but jesus fucking christ...

Certainly lots of evidence of Hannity coordinating WH responses in conjunction with his own media presence all in secret. At a minimum, impeachable 1A violation. Hannity represented the media as a shadow extension of the White House (although more disturbingly, the WH seems to be the shadow extension of Hannity more often in this relationship).
 
Naw, he doesn't look like a stereotypical thug.

imrs.php

Haha he looks and has the name as a SNL Character
 
i doubt this will land an indictment (not even sure what crime if any would have been committed), but jesus fucking christ...
I've expressed several times on here, there is no separation between the Republican party and Fox. They coordinate news to make sure it's not FAKE. 🙂
 
i doubt this will land an indictment (not even sure what crime if any would have been committed), but jesus fucking christ...




Heh, I never saw that one coming.



/s
 
Interviews really are different and it is fairly common for a reporter to send a list of questions ahead of time. It's a scheduled interview, not an ambush.

Quite frankly, I wish the debate questions were sent to all candidates ahead of time and then kill the mic if a candidate is ignoring the questions asked and going off topic.
 
Looks like John's case got another blow. We will see.

Judge spares Clinton camp in Sussmann ruling - POLITICO

A federal judge has turned down a request from Special Counsel John Durham for a ruling that a lawyer facing trial on a false statement charge was part of a wide-ranging “joint venture” involving Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, Democratic operatives, private investigation firm Fusion GPS and various technology researchers.
 
Looks like John's case got another blow. We will see.

Judge spares Clinton camp in Sussmann ruling - POLITICO

A federal judge has turned down a request from Special Counsel John Durham for a ruling that a lawyer facing trial on a false statement charge was part of a wide-ranging “joint venture” involving Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, Democratic operatives, private investigation firm Fusion GPS and various technology researchers.
And on it goes...

Clinton 2016 campaign manager denies approving passing anti-Trump info to FBI - POLITICO

Called as a witness by Sussmann’s defense, Mook told jurors that he would have vigorously opposed taking the allegations to the FBI because the campaign had no faith in the bureau after the FBI’s then-director James Comey publicly blasted Clinton as he closed an investigation into her use of a private email account when she served as secretary of State.


Asked if he would have favored handing the server information to the FBI, Mook said: “Absolutely not.”
“We did not trust them,” the Clinton campaign manager said of the nation’s premier law enforcement agency. “Two or three of probably the most damaging days of the campaign were caused by James Comey, not by Donald Trump. ... We just did not want to have anything to do with the organization at that time.”

Also...

Former FBI official recounts alleged lie at heart of Sussmann trial - POLITICO
 
I guess it was another mistake by the FBI. Again, the investigators are the ones getting in trouble for "Trump-Russia Collusion". Just another in a long line of totalitarian tactics used by the Democrats to silence any opposition to their drive to turn the country into some police state.


 
I guess it was another mistake by the FBI. Again, the investigators are the ones getting in trouble for "Trump-Russia Collusion". Just another in a long line of totalitarian tactics used by the Democrats to silence any opposition to their drive to turn the country into some police state.


Let me help you out:

Washington Times: Shit
Washington Post: Good

New York Post: Shit
New York Times: Good.

You keep getting your New York’s, Washingtons, Posts and Times reversed.
 
I guess it was another mistake by the FBI. Again, the investigators are the ones getting in trouble for "Trump-Russia Collusion". Just another in a long line of totalitarian tactics used by the Democrats to silence any opposition to their drive to turn the country into some police state.



Every new post you make is this: totalitarian-something-democrats. You think you're obfuscating? Running interference? Tell us what you *think* you're doing cause it just looks hella retracted from here.
 
I guess it was another mistake by the FBI. Again, the investigators are the ones getting in trouble for "Trump-Russia Collusion". Just another in a long line of totalitarian tactics used by the Democrats to silence any opposition to their drive to turn the country into some police state.



LOL!

Unanimous acquittal.
 
Indictments are incoming and soon the Democrats will have to answer for their traitorous and election rigging ways.


Not only was Sussman acquitted, but the ONLY charge was not disclosing he worked for Clinton.

Note there was NO CHARGE for passing fraudulent information?

Note there was NO CHARGE of attempted fraud?

Note there was NO CHARGE for supplying false information to law enforcement?

Because the intel he passed on is VALID.

Dipshit.

roflcopter-2.jpg
 
Back
Top