Indictments coming...

Page 199 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,027
2,884
136
i doubt this will land an indictment (not even sure what crime if any would have been committed), but jesus fucking christ...

Certainly lots of evidence of Hannity coordinating WH responses in conjunction with his own media presence all in secret. At a minimum, impeachable 1A violation. Hannity represented the media as a shadow extension of the White House (although more disturbingly, the WH seems to be the shadow extension of Hannity more often in this relationship).
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,405
136
Naw, he doesn't look like a stereotypical thug.

imrs.php

Haha he looks and has the name as a SNL Character
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,266
12,431
136
i doubt this will land an indictment (not even sure what crime if any would have been committed), but jesus fucking christ...
I've expressed several times on here, there is no separation between the Republican party and Fox. They coordinate news to make sure it's not FAKE. :)
 

Lanyap

Elite Member
Dec 23, 2000
8,289
2,385
136
i doubt this will land an indictment (not even sure what crime if any would have been committed), but jesus fucking christ...




Heh, I never saw that one coming.



/s
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,143
34,446
136
Interviews really are different and it is fairly common for a reporter to send a list of questions ahead of time. It's a scheduled interview, not an ambush.

Quite frankly, I wish the debate questions were sent to all candidates ahead of time and then kill the mic if a candidate is ignoring the questions asked and going off topic.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,266
12,431
136
Looks like John's case got another blow. We will see.

Judge spares Clinton camp in Sussmann ruling - POLITICO

A federal judge has turned down a request from Special Counsel John Durham for a ruling that a lawyer facing trial on a false statement charge was part of a wide-ranging “joint venture” involving Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, Democratic operatives, private investigation firm Fusion GPS and various technology researchers.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,266
12,431
136
Looks like John's case got another blow. We will see.

Judge spares Clinton camp in Sussmann ruling - POLITICO

A federal judge has turned down a request from Special Counsel John Durham for a ruling that a lawyer facing trial on a false statement charge was part of a wide-ranging “joint venture” involving Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, Democratic operatives, private investigation firm Fusion GPS and various technology researchers.
And on it goes...

Clinton 2016 campaign manager denies approving passing anti-Trump info to FBI - POLITICO

Called as a witness by Sussmann’s defense, Mook told jurors that he would have vigorously opposed taking the allegations to the FBI because the campaign had no faith in the bureau after the FBI’s then-director James Comey publicly blasted Clinton as he closed an investigation into her use of a private email account when she served as secretary of State.


Asked if he would have favored handing the server information to the FBI, Mook said: “Absolutely not.”
“We did not trust them,” the Clinton campaign manager said of the nation’s premier law enforcement agency. “Two or three of probably the most damaging days of the campaign were caused by James Comey, not by Donald Trump. ... We just did not want to have anything to do with the organization at that time.”

Also...

Former FBI official recounts alleged lie at heart of Sussmann trial - POLITICO
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,365
1,223
126
I guess it was another mistake by the FBI. Again, the investigators are the ones getting in trouble for "Trump-Russia Collusion". Just another in a long line of totalitarian tactics used by the Democrats to silence any opposition to their drive to turn the country into some police state.


 
  • Haha
Reactions: zinfamous

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,691
15,939
146
I guess it was another mistake by the FBI. Again, the investigators are the ones getting in trouble for "Trump-Russia Collusion". Just another in a long line of totalitarian tactics used by the Democrats to silence any opposition to their drive to turn the country into some police state.


Let me help you out:

Washington Times: Shit
Washington Post: Good

New York Post: Shit
New York Times: Good.

You keep getting your New York’s, Washingtons, Posts and Times reversed.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,423
15,785
136
I guess it was another mistake by the FBI. Again, the investigators are the ones getting in trouble for "Trump-Russia Collusion". Just another in a long line of totalitarian tactics used by the Democrats to silence any opposition to their drive to turn the country into some police state.



Every new post you make is this: totalitarian-something-democrats. You think you're obfuscating? Running interference? Tell us what you *think* you're doing cause it just looks hella retracted from here.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,627
10,330
136
I guess it was another mistake by the FBI. Again, the investigators are the ones getting in trouble for "Trump-Russia Collusion". Just another in a long line of totalitarian tactics used by the Democrats to silence any opposition to their drive to turn the country into some police state.



LOL!

Unanimous acquittal.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,520
33,053
136
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,405
136
Any day now……
Current batch of D’s don’t have it in them to do anything.
It has been greater than 5 YEARS since the first post.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,451
19,901
146
Indictments are incoming and soon the Democrats will have to answer for their traitorous and election rigging ways.


Not only was Sussman acquitted, but the ONLY charge was not disclosing he worked for Clinton.

Note there was NO CHARGE for passing fraudulent information?

Note there was NO CHARGE of attempted fraud?

Note there was NO CHARGE for supplying false information to law enforcement?

Because the intel he passed on is VALID.

Dipshit.

roflcopter-2.jpg