Indictments coming...

Page 115 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Younigue

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2017
5,888
1,447
106
As I understand it, you are an expert on disease with all of your personal experience.
Holy shit! Your impotence is profound, ya flaccid, incompetent, stain on society.

Wait... Do you mean my arthritis? LOL! Yup, you impotent. If it lasts more than ... What's it now 65+ years? You're an old hateful scumbag right? Back to my point, if your impotence persists longer than 65+ years NEVER consult a doctor. You're a lost cause and better for humankind without the use of your manliness(?)

Truly though, your comebacks are so weak. You seem like you're crying... ALL THE TIME. Don't you have an emotional support animal to help you out before you start typing?
 
Jan 25, 2011
17,032
9,484
146

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,026
2,879
136
@pcgeek11 and others who disparage the Mueller investigation for producing no evidence of collusion against Trump, what the hell do you expect them to produce while the investigation is ongoing? There is no precedent for indicting a sitting president, thus any findings against Trump would be delivered to Congress with recommendations after conclusion of the investigation. Until them, releasing any evidence collected is very much counter to their ability to conduct the investigation. The fact that nothing has come out from Mueller is strong evidence that he's running the investigation well. It means nothing as to whether they are likely to have criminal findings against Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Younigue

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,469
10,066
136
Now this is the type of winning I can get behind!

The minute he's confirmed to be cooperating with Mueller, two things will happen:

1) Trump files suit against Cohen for "violating attorney-client privilege

2) Rosenstein/Sessions are fired, with the purpose of firing Mueller and ending the special counsel investigation.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,403
136
The minute he's confirmed to be cooperating with Mueller, two things will happen:

1) Trump files suit against Cohen for "violating attorney-client privilege

2) Rosenstein/Sessions are fired, with the purpose of firing Mueller and ending the special counsel investigation.

3) Things get weird & interesting
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,693
20,248
146
@pcgeek11 and others who disparage the Mueller investigation for producing no evidence of collusion against Trump, what the hell do you expect them to produce while the investigation is ongoing? There is no precedent for indicting a sitting president, thus any findings against Trump would be delivered to Congress with recommendations after conclusion of the investigation. Until them, releasing any evidence collected is very much counter to their ability to conduct the investigation. The fact that nothing has come out from Mueller is strong evidence that he's running the investigation well. It means nothing as to whether they are likely to have criminal findings against Trump.

You're such an intellectual, don't interrupt the lock her up chant
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,850
146
@pcgeek11 and others who disparage the Mueller investigation for producing no evidence of collusion against Trump, what the hell do you expect them to produce while the investigation is ongoing? There is no precedent for indicting a sitting president, thus any findings against Trump would be delivered to Congress with recommendations after conclusion of the investigation. Until them, releasing any evidence collected is very much counter to their ability to conduct the investigation. The fact that nothing has come out from Mueller is strong evidence that he's running the investigation well. It means nothing as to whether they are likely to have criminal findings against Trump.

The thing you're ignoring is, they don't actually care about any of the specifics (since they're stuck in the mindset that they're gonna get screwed by both parties, so they'd prefer if it was the party that at least pays lip service to some of their beliefs and defends them spouting their various hate). The more you bother even addressing them when they have nothing actually tangible, the more you play into their hand. They want to just make you waste your time telling them off. That also plays into their persecution complexes. Which is why you should just ignore them when they're clearly not adding anything (pretty sure the person you're responding to has been making the exact same argument for the entirety of this thread, and possibly longer since they were probably saying the same thing before this thread existed). If they provide something tangible, then sure, respond. But their typical posts aren't worth responding to.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,739
31,104
146
@pcgeek11 and others who disparage the Mueller investigation for producing no evidence of collusion against Trump, what the hell do you expect them to produce while the investigation is ongoing? There is no precedent for indicting a sitting president, thus any findings against Trump would be delivered to Congress with recommendations after conclusion of the investigation. Until them, releasing any evidence collected is very much counter to their ability to conduct the investigation. The fact that nothing has come out from Mueller is strong evidence that he's running the investigation well. It means nothing as to whether they are likely to have criminal findings against Trump.

I mean, you are asking a bunch of goons to come back with rational arguments when they literally believe there is already "tons of evidence" for "Hilary collusion" and their daily mindpower is dedicated to confusion over why she isn't being prosecuted. They are too busy reminding you that "it is all there!" about Hilary, without ever really providing it and demanding "you educate yourself!", to bother investigating the actual publicly-disclosed mountains of verified evidence against the Trump crime family.

This is a tall ask.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hugo Stiglitz

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Hard to do when its obvious they don't have any.

They just got chumped by Trump. That's what happened. He's the world's greatest bullshit artist & con man. The way this is working out will convince a lot of them that they, we, all of us made a terrible mistake.

It may work out for the best in the end because Trump unmasks the contempt & avarice that the GOP leadership has for ordinary Americans. The people at the top of the right wing lootocracy have no mercy for the little guy, none at all. They'll sacrifice the 99.9% on the altar of greed, every time. They rigged the game in their favor back in the Reagan era and have been beating the cash out of us ever since.

We need a different answer to the question of "Whose country is it, anyway?" If we say that's just the stockholders, bondholders & management then the rest of us get screwed like we have been since we went for trickle down Reaganomics back in the 80's. We demanded & got better from the people at the top before that. I didn't notice rich people suffering from being rich back in the 70's, either, when they paid us better & paid higher taxes, too.
 

skull

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2000
2,209
327
126
The way they act right now it could go the other way and turn into a dictatorship/civil war. As of right now trump can do no wrong its all fake news and deep state corruption. I held out hope for the longest but at this rate I'm convinced a good chunk of our population is brainwashed. It seemed so obvious before he even got elected he was a con man. By this time last year it was how can anyone believe a word this guy says? Now its just no matter what happens you know they're going to say you don't have the right facts you need to turn on fox and get away from the clinton news network.