Indictments coming...

Page 118 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Honestly, I don't know who I want to control the house. I'm a bit of a gridlock fan, as doing nothing is generally the best of many bad options when talking about congress.
The problem I have right now is the signal to noise ratio has gone so far out of whack that it takes a lot of effort to get facts. Speculation, hyperbole, spin, and outright lies hide a lot of valid information. Most "news" is so sensationalized as to be worthless. It's discouraging. I don't want to here about how evil one side or the other is, I just want information and well thought out opinions.

It's the Trump effect. He generates chaos & conspiracy theory as cover. He's also running scared & has been all along. There's probably reason for that.

I don't think we want people who support him in control of Congress. The effect so far tells us that.
 

Younigue

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2017
5,888
1,447
106
Read the IG report with an open mind. There is plenty of bias.
That's right, you just can't get out of your own head. It's slimey, festering, hateful, unsolvable maze in there eh? Is that the bias you speak of?
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
If you haven't you might look at the psychology of the anti-vaxxers and how education works, or rather how it doesn't.

I'm open to solutions which work in such mindsets. What do you have?

The whole anti-vaxxer thing has seriously declined. Yeh, sure, it's still there but a lot fewer people are inclined to believe it.

We can't hope to convert fringe zealots. The best we can do is to discredit them & encourage people to use their minds to not get caught up in the bullshit. Be careful of what you believe in.

Falling for right wing politics is like crack cocaine- just because is feels good doesn't mean that it is good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trenchfoot

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,026
2,879
136
If you haven't you might look at the psychology of the anti-vaxxers and how education works, or rather how it doesn't.

I'm open to solutions which work in such mindsets. What do you have?

Well let's see last week I had a patient ask my when money was going to be illegal. I'm pretty used to fielding things which make no logical sense, although that doesn't mean they don't make sense. I find that, when you're able to show interest in the person who has a real conflict driving the illogical material, you can accomplish a lot by simply pointing out a small discrepancy. But it could just be the Zyprexa.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,739
31,104
146
Let me bold this part that was glossed over:

" I thought everyone said this was a Republican conspiracy and there was nothing to investigate. looks like maybe there is."

Please take note of the word INVESTIGATE and Looks like maybe there is.

And that the facts showed that she is just as guilty as Petraeus. Possibly more.

and before that statement you claimed that she was already guilty, without even knowing the content of TWO EMAILS.

Why did you gloss over the "presumed guilty" part of your post?
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,739
31,104
146
Hillary mishandled classified documents.
Petraeus mishandled classified documents.

Both of those statements are facts. They are both guilty.

The FBI was overly generous to Hillary when compared to many other cases such as the sailor that took some photos and went to jail.

Trump and his sons just feed the classified information directly to our enemies.

But let's wait until even more facts are known, right?
 

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
Trump and his sons just feed the classified information directly to our enemies.

But let's wait until even more facts are known, right?
Let's wait for more plea deals of people admitting they are guilty of crimes... to see if any crimes were committed.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,261
4,944
136
and before that statement you claimed that she was already guilty, without even knowing the content of TWO EMAILS.

Why did you gloss over the "presumed guilty" part of your post?

I don't need to know the content as the information was classified as Top Secret. She mishandled the classified documents and is guilty.

This is part of the reason:

Two of the four classified messages discovered in emails turned over to the State Department by Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton were labeled "top secret," the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Tuesday.

The development in the FBI inquiry came the same day that a top intelligence official whose office has been reviewing some of Clinton’s e-mails informed congressional leaders that top-secret information had been contained in two e-mails that traveled across the server.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126

well we have a dirth of evidence to the contrary.

6o9WYhm.png
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,686
8,234
136
I'd have to know if those "top secret" emails of Hillary's were false leads or not before considering her culpability in the matter.

"Nothing is as it seems" is the norm where national security is concerned, especially at that level of international relations.

To assume something to prove a point is................pointless.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,766
54,800
136
I don't need to know the content as the information was classified as Top Secret. She mishandled the classified documents and is guilty.

This is part of the reason:

Two of the four classified messages discovered in emails turned over to the State Department by Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton were labeled "top secret," the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Tuesday.

The development in the FBI inquiry came the same day that a top intelligence official whose office has been reviewing some of Clinton’s e-mails informed congressional leaders that top-secret information had been contained in two e-mails that traveled across the server.

Then you are guilty as well as you have almost certainly inadvertently transmitted something in your life that contained top secret material.

We all know the game you are playing and I’m very sure that includes you. Patreus committed a crime and Clinton did not and there’s no escaping this. Because of some weird pride thing and extreme partisanship you don’t want to admit it so you invent some new offense and declare them both ‘guilty’ so you can tie Clinton to a criminal in your mind. You’re acting totally irrational.

Like we already established, you have one set of standards for Democrats and another for Republicans and it’s clear as day. You’re a hypocrite.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Buttery males is some sort of mental shield that Trumpsters throw up when stressed, when confronted with developments unflattering to the Great Leader. It's a way to kill honest discussion wrt any subject.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,171
18,808
146
You don't get to decide that this never happens again. The people you're disparaging are US citizens that voted in a legal election. Pretending that Russian wizards used their Jedi mind control to sway the results is a fun little game, but it is a game. The smug superiority exhibited by many on the far left probably swayed far more votes than Gandalf's Russian brother. The answer to that is of course that the far left doesn't care about a bunch of ignorant knuckle dragging toothless rednecks, an attitude that will work well for Trump in 2020.

You know you've run out of arguments when you attempt to deny the fact that propaganda and advertising works.

Seriously.

We have centuries of proof. Advertising is one of the largest industries in the world. Why would that be if it is not wildly effective? Propaganda is historically the most effective tool to sway public opinion, used since the earliest governments. Using lies as weapons has been wildly successful. In fact, viral advertising/propaganda has proven to be even more effective. This is the very kind used by Russia in the election. With many of you STILL spouting the lies they spread.

And you attempt to deny it.

Seriously?

Do you not realize how pathetically stupid this makes you look?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,766
54,800
136
You know you've run out of arguments when you attempt to deny the fact that propaganda and advertising works.

Seriously.

We have centuries of proof. Advertising is one of the largest industries in the world. Why would that be if it is not wildly effective? Propaganda is historically the most effective tool to sway public opinion, used since the earliest governments. Using lies as weapons has been wildly successful. In fact, viral advertising/propaganda has proven to be even more effective. This is the very kind used by Russia in the election. With many of you STILL spouting the lies they spread.

And you attempt to deny it.

Seriously?

Do you not realize how pathetically stupid this makes you look?

I've always liked how people like him deny that Russian propaganda had any effect on the election but are simultaneously convinced the librul media hurts conservatives through bias against them. They apparently have no issue holding the same two thoughts in their head at the same time.