• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

In god we trust...?! WTF?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Craig234 said:
Whatever my objections to anything about the royals, you're like the guy who 'agrees' with, say, objections to Obama's civil rights policies with 'I agree, F*** that N****R'.
Click to expand...

There's a key fundamental difference. Obama is an elected official whereas the Queen Hag is unelected and represents a truly discriminatory and barbaric institution. The title needs to be removed and she needs to be a regular and normal citizen and not worshiped by the limeys.

I don't expect you to understand. Many liberals here in the US have become 'Europeanized' at the expense of human rights and decency.
 
RabidMongoose said:
There's a key fundamental difference. Obama is an elected official whereas the Queen Hag is unelected and represents a truly discriminatory and barbaric institution. The title needs to be removed and she needs to be a regular and normal citizen and not worshiped by the limeys.

I don't expect you to understand. Many liberals here in the US have become 'Europeanized' at the expense of human rights and decency.
Click to expand...

You are well named, I have to say, the rabid part that is. What did the word "barbaric" ever do to you, that you attack it so badly?

You abuse the word "discriminatory" as well, cheapening it from its general meaning in politics on things like broad classes being denied rights by another group.

So when blacks are segregated, you use the same word for the royal family.

What, exactly, does the Queen do that is 'barbaric' today?

What 'human rights' are liberals in the US violating? What 'decency' is violated?

Each of those needs its own answer.
 
Craig234 said:
You are well named, I have to say, the rabid part that is. What did the word "barbaric" ever do to you, that you attack it so badly?

You abuse the word "discriminatory" as well, cheapening it from its general meaning in politics on things like broad classes being denied rights by another group. It is as if you are a Europeanized clone who has been brainwashed to follow his Queen Bitch.

So when blacks are segregated, you use the same word for the royal family.

What, exactly, does the Queen do that is 'barbaric' today?
Click to expand...

You are well named as well. The drone like numbering of '234' with a generic first name is that of a brainwashed sheep.

The entire institution of the Queen Hag is barbaric because of its very inherent discriminatory nature. The line of succession favors male heirs over female heirs. The head of state must be of one particular religion, thereby denying many people any opportunity of ever being their country's head of state.

You abuse the word 'discriminatory' by allowing and seemingly promoting gender discrimination and religious discrimination and their continued celebration in the form of a barbaric custom in the monarchy-peasant caste system.

What 'human rights' are liberals in the US violating? What 'decency' is violated?

Each of those needs its own answer.
Click to expand...

I'm not saying that 'human rights' are being violated by liberals in the US. I'm saying that many liberals in the US have become 'europeanized' liberals and as such allow European countries and societies to continue with their social ills.

Look at you. You're a perfect example. You think it's fine to allow gender discrimination and religious discrimination when dealing with a country's head of state.

You're completely conservative when it comes to Europe. You want to continue these disgusting and barbaric traditions because of how europeanized your politics have become. This is very typical of many American liberals. They believe that anything European is liberal when it is anything but liberal. You have been tricked and deceived.
 
Last edited:
Craig234 said:
You are well named, I have to say, the rabid part that is. What did the word "barbaric" ever do to you, that you attack it so badly?

You abuse the word "discriminatory" as well, cheapening it from its general meaning in politics on things like broad classes being denied rights by another group.

So when blacks are segregated, you use the same word for the royal family.

What, exactly, does the Queen do that is 'barbaric' today?

What 'human rights' are liberals in the US violating? What 'decency' is violated?

Each of those needs its own answer.
Click to expand...

Dude, I know it's tempting but just ignore him, he has no idea what he's talking about he spends most of his time calling people from the UK peasants, when he has no idea what that word means. He's just a troll, whenever someone mentions the UK he's there trying to get a rise out of us insulting the royal family etc, with no understanding of how the country works.
 
neckbeard, you are peasants.... you bow to the crown. he might be a little bit of a whackjob, but some of the shit he says is true.
 
bfdd said:
neckbeard, you are peasants.... you bow to the crown. he might be a little bit of a whackjob, but some of the shit he says is true.
Click to expand...

Just for you:

peas·ant (pznt)
n.
1. A member of the class constituted by small farmers and tenants, sharecroppers, and laborers on the land where they form the main labor force in agriculture.
2. A country person; a rustic.

Has nothing to do with bowing to a monarch.
 
bfdd said:
neckbeard, you are peasants.... you bow to the crown. he might be a little bit of a whackjob, but some of the shit he says is true.
Click to expand...

They're peasants, peons, servants who bow down to their Overlords in the monarchial caste system. It is one of the greatest deceits in human history and these limeys are still defending it.
 
bfdd said:
whatever, you know what he means by peasant. serf.
Click to expand...

No I don't and neither does he, evidently you americans must have your own special definition for every word. He's just a troll trying to insult me because he can't accept that England is so much better than America. It's OK.
 
No I understand completely what he is saying, his choice of words are off, but it makes the same point. You guys are happy with your serfdom and bowing to the crown. You're nothing but glorified indentured servants as long as you guys keep your Monarchy.

And you want to rag on the USA for our choice of words? Please... Canada is another "separation of church and state" country and guess what title they adorned your shared Queen?
Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith
 
Last edited:
bfdd said:
No I understand completely what he is saying, his choice of words are off, but it makes the same point. You guys are happy with your serfdom and bowing to the crown. You're nothing but glorified indentured servants as long as you guys keep your Monarchy.
Click to expand...

When it has an effect on my day to day life, I'll complain but it doesn't I never has and it never will so I don't see the problem. (That's because there is no problem)
 
HAL9000 said:
When it has an effect on my day to day life, I'll complain but it doesn't I never has and it never will so I don't see the problem. (That's because there is no problem)
Click to expand...

It does have an effect on your day to day life. You're not a free person, you're a servant to the crown. A serf. You bow down to someone every day you wake up and praise being born where you were born. That sucks for you and it's a huge problem. No man should have to bow to another because of such ridiculous non-sense as being "king" or "queen".


btw i'm done shitting on you in your stupid attempt to troll Americans. you fail every time because you have no clue what you're talking about ever.
 
HAL9000 said:
When it has an effect on my day to day life, I'll complain but it doesn't I never has and it never will so I don't see the problem. (That's because there is no problem)
Click to expand...

Yet, you create a thread about the US which has no effect on your life. Troll Thread.
 
bfdd said:
It does have an effect on your day to day life. You're not a free person, you're a servant to the crown. A serf. You bow down to someone every day you wake up and praise being born where you were born. That sucks for you and it's a huge problem. No man should have to bow to another because of such ridiculous non-sense as being "king" or "queen".
Click to expand...

Really? I wake up every day and praise something... No... I don't and everything you are listing is theory, in practice it has no effect on my life nor can it.
 
HAL9000 said:
Really? I wake up every day and praise something... No... I don't and everything you are listing is theory, in practice it has no effect on my life nor can it.
Click to expand...

lol? All you do is rant and rave about how awesome it is to be English, so it sounds to me like you do enjoy being a serf.

You always wonder why we Americans are the way we are. It's because we're FREE, where you are not.
 
bfdd said:
lol? All you do is rant and rave about how awesome it is to be English, so it sounds to me like you do enjoy being a serf.

You always wonder why we Americans are the way we are. It's because we're FREE, where you are not.
Click to expand...

I am free, in practice. So.... Yeah England is awesome. If american's nothing of being free is what you think makes america good, then I laugh at you, americas notion of freedom is fucked up. But that's because your country is still in it's infancy, you'll grow up given time.
 
HAL9000 said:
When it has an effect on my day to day life, I'll complain but it doesn't I never has and it never will so I don't see the problem. (That's because there is no problem)
Click to expand...

Yeah, there's no problem when you support a discriminatory institution. No problem at all.

Wow, this Queen Hag sure has these limeys brainwashed pretty well.
 
HAL9000 said:
I am free, in practice. So.... Yeah England is awesome. If american's nothing of being free is what you think makes america good, then I laugh at you, americas notion of freedom is fucked up. But that's because your country is still in it's infancy, you'll grow up given time.
Click to expand...

Our notion of freedom is fucked up? lol... your notion of freedom is fucked up. You just said you're "free, in practice" that means absolutely jack shit besides "i'm not free". you fucking retarded serf.

it's ok though, i already shit on you so hard this thread. You have no refute for the Canadian title of your Queen nor your dumbass shit of "lol America is stupid separation of church and state then why god on money?" moron.
 
bfdd said:
Our notion of freedom is fucked up? lol... your notion of freedom is fucked up. You just said you're "free, in practice" that means absolutely jack shit besides "i'm not free". you fucking retarded serf.

it's ok though, i already shit on you so hard this thread. You have no refute for the Canadian title of your Queen nor your dumbass shit of "lol America is stupid separation of church and state then why god on money?" moron.
Click to expand...

I don't know what you're talking about with "the Canadian title of your Queen" but aside from that, I'm free. Completely free. More free than you. With more rights than you. I know it's hard but you're country will learn one day. It will take time.
 
====[END OF THREAD DERAILMENT IS HERE]====

So anyone, why is it OK to have god in the american motto, when there is supposed to be this separation in place?!
 
HAL9000 said:
I don't know what you're talking about with "the Canadian title of your Queen" but aside from that, I'm free. Completely free. More free than you. With more rights than you. I know it's hard but you're country will learn one day. It will take time.
Click to expand...

The British version of 'freedom' necessarily involves serfdom, brutality, and barbarism. It involves being a peasant subject to an Overlord. It involves raping the entire world 100 times over and enslaving most of the world. That's British 'freedom'

Freedom is so alien to limeys that they are incapable of understanding the very concept when others speak of it. You simply cannot be free when you have been subjected to a monarchy-peasant caste system.

spot o tea, guv'nor, yip yip, cheerio, glory to thee Queen Hag yip yip!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top