In case you think Communism works

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

MAW1082

Senior member
Jun 17, 2003
510
7
81
Originally posted by: Train
Actually the church is responsible for PRESERVING and PROTECTING most pre-dark age knowledge, which otherwise would have been lost.

your comment is based on what?

Galileo Galilei who? That's an example of what my argument is based on. If you would like some more examples, feel free to ask.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: MAW1082
Weel, even though my degree is not fictional, I have this to say.

There are three parts to a rhetorical argument:
Ethos - Credibility of the writer.
Pathos - Emotional Appeals
Logos - Appeals based on logic or facts.

So, in fact, credibility is important.
Here, your degree (or lack of) is irrelevant to establishing credibility. In fact, it is generally considered on internet forums that bragging about your degree/penis size /whatever (instead of sticking to the merits, if any, of your own logical argument) is the surest way to damage your own credibility. This is why it is called "e-penis". I have 10 doctorates myself. :roll:

Originally posted by: MAW1082
Galileo Galilei who? That's an example of what my argument is based on. If you would like some more examples, feel free to ask.
Galileo was an example of politics. You really ought to study up on it. Had Galileo not been such an offensive ass and would have enabled the church to save political face, it surely would have embraced his discoveries. Unfortunately, he would not.
 

Satchel

Member
Mar 19, 2003
105
0
0
Originally posted by: MAW1082
Originally posted by: Vic
Just as communism is proven to be repressive.

This is an internet forum. And as such, about arguments, not individuals. Stick to that. Just because you can't make the argument you want to make does not mean it's time for you to whip out your fictional e-penis, nor will I join you in such an absurdity.

Weel, even though my degree is not fictional, I have this to say.

There are three parts to a rhetorical argument:
Ethos - Credibility of the writer.
Pathos - Emotional Appeals
Logos - Appeals based on logic or facts.

So, in fact, credibility is important.

While I'm sure we're all impressed with your ability to pull this information out of one of the text books sitting on your desk, it's irrelevant because everyone on the internet is a Harvard graduate if they chose to be. Credentials mean nothing here. Back up your argument or move along.

 

Proletariat

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2004
5,614
0
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Proletariat
You are not a sheep or cow right now?

This my friends is a prime example of what Ayn Rand can do to you. Keep dreaming Vic.

Ayn Rand was one of the most manipulative, evil women alive. There is in fact an entire film on f***ed up her life was, and how she f***ed the people around her.

Capitalism is what many countries have to use to compete because of historical factors. American capitalists ruthlessly assassinated and killed millions in their quest to stamp out global communism/socialism. Many countries which felt the effects of older European capitalism and modern American capitalism had to adopt the very practices of their enemy in order to compete because their economies fed other nations for so long and were so behind.
:roll:

First, attack my argument, not me. Oh, oops, you have no argument. Except lies, which is all that communism is.

Second, Rand is not one of my primary political-economic inspirations. You've said before that you think she is, and you are wrong. My primary inspirations are Jefferson, Heinlein, and McWilliams. In that order. Quit pretending that you know me. You obviously don't.

Third, your entire pro-communist argument reflects the flaw that is seen in every pro-communist argument. You cannot tell the difference between choice and coercion. You see no difference in a person being a sheep by choice, or at gunpoint. Your morals, like those of all communists, are that whacked. Doing unto others what you would never want done to yourself is not, I imagine, something that would make you pause for one second.

Fourth, (and I'll it again) capitalism != imperialism. Capitalism is a free market controlled solely by private interests. Imperialism, by very definition, requires a level of government control, intervention, and regulation. Try another argument.
Dude you are just very angry at me. I understand that, you hate people who have emotions. I'm sorry I do. I am human. I care about others, even outside my country.

That being said, I'm not even pro-communist, just read my post earlier in this thread. I'm not going to post it again.

Original Communism, according to Marx, was a step by step process of societal evolution - with Capitalism being one of the steps. I suppose if he had a biology degree he would hypothesize that men would eventually realize their follies and evolve. The thing about that is if you are too kind you will refute evolution and keep people alive - you know the drill. But maybe in the modern environment the mind develops more than the body. So maybe after this phase of global capitalism our minds will evolve to a level where Communism is realistic.

 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Dude you are just very angry at me. I understand that, you hate people who have emotions. I'm sorry I do. I am human. I care about others, even outside my country.

That being said, I'm not even pro-communist, just read my post earlier in this thread. I'm not going to post it again.

Original Communism, according to Marx, was a step by step process of societal evolution - with Capitalism being one of the steps. I suppose if he had a biology degree he would hypothesize that men would eventually realize their follies and evolve. The thing about that is if you are too kind you will refute evolution and keep people alive - you know the drill. But maybe in the modern environment the mind develops more than the body. So maybe after this phase of global capitalism our minds will evolve to a level where Communism is realistic.
:roll:

No... I don't like you because your only argument against mine is to tell lies about me.

I have emotions myself, and love people with emotions. I care deeply about people, both inside and outside my country, which is one reason why I believe the slavery and cruelty of communism must be stopped.

You -- like all your ilk -- are full of sh!t. Lies are your stock-in-trade. Our minds are never going to evolve into the mass slavery that is communism, regardless of your desire for power, exploitation, and revenge. Instead, we are going to evolve into greater enlightenment and appreciation of the individual freedom of each other. We will learn that love begins with respect, not the point of a gun. We will learn to tolerate the failings of others, as we would have our own failings tolerated, and not try to force others against their will into our own personal vision of what we think the world should be like.
 

coomar

Banned
Apr 4, 2005
2,431
0
0
it looked like recently that one of the steps marx wrote about, the amalagamation of assets was coming to fruition, however it seems now that companies are back to splitting up, isn't time warner breaking up, 21st century communism was just a lie told to justify a dictatorship

the arabs also kept europe's knowledge during the dark ages

american/canadian farming subsidies and the sheer amount of extraneous grain produced and then sold to other nations destroys local farming and creates dependence, most of our aid has strings attached that hamstring governments

technology has raised the standard of living
 

Amplifier

Banned
Dec 25, 2004
3,143
0
0
Originally posted by: MAW1082

Technological innovation is exponential. How an exponential function work is that it increases very slowly until it "explodes." The founder of Intel came up with this theory, it's called Moore's Law and is taught to nearly every EE/CS/CE/ME university student.

Pro-Communists are certainly not anti-technologist. I think you'll discover this by either reading Marx or Lenin. Marx was obsessed with industrialization. Lenin was obsessed with electricity. So, in that sense, you're exactly wrong.

Just out of curiosity, what is you education level? I'm beginning to think I'm arguing with someone who still has a lot to learn.

Disagree with Vic all you want, but you aren't going to be able to insult his education.

Weel, even though my degree is not fictional, I have this to say.

There are three parts to a rhetorical argument:
Ethos - Credibility of the writer.
Pathos - Emotional Appeals
Logos - Appeals based on logic or facts.

So, in fact, credibility is important.

That's copied word for word from an English 101 textbook.

No doubt your degree isn't fictional.
 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
Actually, I am interested in Vic's education level and many other members. One's education has an huge affect on where one stands politically.

Not that it matters to the debate, continue please. :)
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Originally posted by: Tab
Actually, I am interested in Vic's education level and many other members. One's education has an huge affect on where one stands politically.

Not that it matters to the debate, continue please. :)

Set up a poll.

 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: Tab
Actually, I am interested in Vic's education level and many other members. One's education has an huge affect on where one stands politically.

Not that it matters to the debate, continue please. :)

Set up a poll.

I'd rather just everyone post a couple well formed paragraphs about their childhood, social background, education and stuff of that nature...

I wouldn't trust everyone in this forum to be honest.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Originally posted by: Tab
I'd rather just everyone post a couple well formed paragraphs about their childhood, social background, education and stuff of that nature...

I wouldn't trust everyone in this forum to be honest.
People on the internet woiuld falsify information /shocked


 

coomar

Banned
Apr 4, 2005
2,431
0
0
born: sri lanka 1983

3 weeks after I was born, my parents house was destroyed in the racial riots that engulfed Sri Lanka. I spent the next month or so of my life in the college my mother taught at. Lived in India for a year, moved to England (2 years, immigrated to Montreal (another 2 years) and finally to Toronto. My father is an accountant, my mother is a social worker. Due to social problems in school, I was recommended for the gifted program. I am well acquainted with public transit. I'm currently in my 3rd year physics/ math at the university of windsor. Windsor is incidently considered the worst comprehensive university in canada but when you high school was at the time probably the best in Canada academically, it teaches you things about relativity.

Technically I'm a dual-citizen, though I just recently realized that since I was born in Sri Lanka I'm a Sri Lankan citizen. Living in Detroit's twin city is strange, so many more trees in Canada. I'm very liberal, I remember we had a political spectrum quiz in high school, my roommate and I were the only two strong liberals. Montreal is for those that don't know, a city in Quebec (the french province of Canada) though it has a large anglophone population. Toronto is the probably the 5th or 6th largest city in North America. These paragraphs aren't very well-formed but I have to flu and its 1 in the morning.
 

HombrePequeno

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2001
4,657
0
0
Originally posted by: Tab
Actually, I am interested in Vic's education level and many other members. One's education has an huge affect on where one stands politically.

Not that it matters to the debate, continue please. :)

I'm going for a BS in Economics and I'm moderately libertarian.

My mother worked her arse off to raise five kids, get an education, and get a decent job. My mother and my stepdad are now making a very decent living and my mom is also thinking about starting up her own business.

I think that's probably had the most impact on my political views. She worked her ass off but I will admit that she did have some help. She recieved help on paying for her education. I agree that the poor need help paying for an education that will help get them a better job (which will boost tax revenue) in the future. My mother is fairly Republican but never really discussed religion with me that often so I was kind of left to figure that one out by myself. That is probably the reason I'm fairly socially liberal.

So that's my background and my views. I still think communism sucks. ;)
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
You all realize that the only reason MAW1082 asked for my educational level was as an extremely weak attempt at ad hominem against me, right? And that was hardly his first logical fallacy, having already used strawman, appeal to authority, appeal to pity, prejudicial language, and even a really weak attempt at trying to assert that I didn't understand a common word that I clearly did understand (it seems, in fact, that he simply couldn't understand my argument). There's very little fierce or objective about him, it seems to me. And certainly no logical argument. "Oh, look! Cher is a communist. That means it must be right!" :roll:

All the while, my argument was logically presented and laid out (albeit in my occasionally hotheaded way ;) ), i.e. that communism is anathema to freedom, and he never once addressed it. Not once. Obviously because he knows it's true.

And W_T_F does his BS in EE have to do with establishing credentials in an argument about political theory and history? Nothing. Back to the server room, IT biatch! :)
 

MAW1082

Senior member
Jun 17, 2003
510
7
81
Originally posted by: Vic
You all realize that the only reason MAW1082 asked for my educational level was as an extremely weak attempt at ad hominem against me, right? And that was hardly his first logical fallacy, having already used strawman, appeal to authority, appeal to pity, prejudicial language, and even a really weak attempt at trying to assert that I didn't understand a common word that I clearly did understand (it seems, in fact, that he simply couldn't understand my argument). There's very little fierce or objective about him, it seems to me. And certainly no logical argument. "Oh, look! Cher is a communist. That means it must be right!" :roll:

All the while, my argument was logically presented and laid out (albeit in my occasionally hotheaded way ;) ), i.e. that communism is anathema to freedom, and he never once addressed it. Not once. Obviously because he knows it's true.

And W_T_F does his BS in EE have to do with establishing credentials in an argument about political theory and history? Nothing. Back to the server room, IT biatch! :)

I guess we can agree to disagree at this point . . .
 

Amplifier

Banned
Dec 25, 2004
3,143
0
0
Originally posted by: MAW1082
Originally posted by: Vic
You all realize that the only reason MAW1082 asked for my educational level was as an extremely weak attempt at ad hominem against me, right? And that was hardly his first logical fallacy, having already used strawman, appeal to authority, appeal to pity, prejudicial language, and even a really weak attempt at trying to assert that I didn't understand a common word that I clearly did understand (it seems, in fact, that he simply couldn't understand my argument). There's very little fierce or objective about him, it seems to me. And certainly no logical argument. "Oh, look! Cher is a communist. That means it must be right!" :roll:

All the while, my argument was logically presented and laid out (albeit in my occasionally hotheaded way ;) ), i.e. that communism is anathema to freedom, and he never once addressed it. Not once. Obviously because he knows it's true.

And W_T_F does his BS in EE have to do with establishing credentials in an argument about political theory and history? Nothing. Back to the server room, IT biatch! :)

I guess we can agree to disagree at this point . . .

Reds always surrender.
 

Colt45

Lifer
Apr 18, 2001
19,720
1
0
Originally posted by: Amplifier
Originally posted by: MAW1082
Originally posted by: Vic
You all realize that the only reason MAW1082 asked for my educational level was as an extremely weak attempt at ad hominem against me, right? And that was hardly his first logical fallacy, having already used strawman, appeal to authority, appeal to pity, prejudicial language, and even a really weak attempt at trying to assert that I didn't understand a common word that I clearly did understand (it seems, in fact, that he simply couldn't understand my argument). There's very little fierce or objective about him, it seems to me. And certainly no logical argument. "Oh, look! Cher is a communist. That means it must be right!" :roll:

All the while, my argument was logically presented and laid out (albeit in my occasionally hotheaded way ;) ), i.e. that communism is anathema to freedom, and he never once addressed it. Not once. Obviously because he knows it's true.

And W_T_F does his BS in EE have to do with establishing credentials in an argument about political theory and history? Nothing. Back to the server room, IT biatch! :)

I guess we can agree to disagree at this point . . .

Reds always surrender.

Yep, just like in vietnam eh?
 

Tommunist

Golden Member
Dec 1, 2004
1,544
0
0
man i was thinking communism worked and then i saw this image and now i know i was wrong :laugh:
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Colt45
"While the State exists there can be no freedom, when there is freedom there will be no State." - ?. ?. ?????
Alright, let me ask you a question: when there is no state, and we live in this perfect freedom, and my neighbor decides to pay my family a visit and and rapes my wife and daughter and kills my son, where is my freedom then when there will be no justice?
Oh, that's right... think cow... hmmm... cud, tasty cud...
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Sad how many people don't know the difference between political, government, and economic systems...
 

cwjerome

Diamond Member
Sep 30, 2004
4,346
26
81
Originally posted by: exdeath
Sad how many people don't know the difference between political, government, and economic systems...


Well, if you toe the traditional mantra, communism is an "economic theory."

I think educated people have moved past this definition. You cannot separate economics from politics and politics from government. Anyone looking at communism from a purely economic standpoint is looking at an incomplete picture. I would more properly define it as a social system, since in actuality, it involves various societal aspects.

More specifically, I would call it a "dictatorship theory," in practice.