Impeachment coming

Page 26 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,721
10,023
136
He acknowledged the President-elect about a month after the election was called by media outlets? Yeah, guess we should pat Mitch on the back for that one... :p

Compared to the Republican base that was LOOKING FORWARD to a military coup as a counter attack to our stealing the election in November?
Mitch is a bastion of sanity and good governance by comparison.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,839
2,625
136
McConnell just got reelected in 2020 (against a tough opponent). Given his age, apparent health and "accomplishments" I doubt greatly he will run again-in fact it wouldn't surprise me if he resigned before the end of his current term.

He's doing what he's doing for the rest of the GOP senators and to try and take the Senate back in 2022. My guess is he will dick the impeachment as long as possible and take a very low key position, seeking to blame it on Dem vindictiveness if it looks like the public will buy that.

Personally I think it would be great if he pushed his caucus hard to vote for impeachment and permanent bar of Trump. That would be best for the country and the GOP. But I'm not holding my breath. Much more likely is Trump forming his Patriot Party.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
He acknowledged the President-elect about a month after the election was called by media outlets? Yeah, guess we should pat Mitch on the back for that one... :p

McConnell knew the inevitable outcome so he just stepped back & let Trump do his thing until after the EC vote. He still wanted things from Trump. As I understand it, the two have not spoken since then. Everything Trump did afterwards was an attempt to overturn the election & Democracy itself. Mitch wouldn't buy it.
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,820
136
McConnell just got reelected in 2020 (against a tough opponent). Given his age, apparent health and "accomplishments" I doubt greatly he will run again-in fact it wouldn't surprise me if he resigned before the end of his current term.

He's doing what he's doing for the rest of the GOP senators and to try and take the Senate back in 2022. My guess is he will dick the impeachment as long as possible and take a very low key position, seeking to blame it on Dem vindictiveness if it looks like the public will buy that.

Personally I think it would be great if he pushed his caucus hard to vote for impeachment and permanent bar of Trump. That would be best for the country and the GOP. But I'm not holding my breath. Much more likely is Trump forming his Patriot Party.

I can see him pushing for a conviction based on his earlier remarks about incitement and lies. Keep in mind that McConnell is also concerned that Trumpism might hijack the party and boot people like him — this prevents the GOP from being chained to Trump and possibly being dragged down if Trump runs in 2024.
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,258
4,033
136
I can see him pushing for a conviction based on his earlier remarks about incitement and lies. Keep in mind that McConnell is also concerned that Trumpism might hijack the party and boot people like him — this prevents the GOP from being chained to Trump and possibly being dragged down if Trump runs in 2024.
What we've seen from McConnell's career is that he has no principles and commitments to live by except the commitment to winning. If he senses there are fewer than 60 solid votes to convict, he'll dick around and obstruct as he's done for a decade. If conviction is already secured with 70+ votes, then he'll show up on the right side of history.
 
Nov 17, 2019
13,297
7,878
136
Y'all act like there's sum'min' wrong with courtin' chikinz.


86aaa29ac241a329bba5192c364c85d9--chicken-cake-foghorn-leghorn.jpg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: pmv and Pohemi

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,243
136
I can see him pushing for a conviction based on his earlier remarks about incitement and lies. Keep in mind that McConnell is also concerned that Trumpism might hijack the party and boot people like him — this prevents the GOP from being chained to Trump and possibly being dragged down if Trump runs in 2024.

Yeah I'm thinking that too. This remark

"The mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the president and other powerful people and they tried to use fear and violence to stop a specific proceeding of the first branch of the federal government which they did not like,"

to me signals support for impeachment.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,023
12,266
136
The official start of the impeachment trial announced.

Under the timeline outlined by Schumer, the House will deliver the article of impeachment Monday evening, senators will be sworn-in Tuesday and the trial will officially begin the week of February 8. The framework for the trial comes after Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) also called for a two-week delay in order to give Trump time to plan his legal defense.

Schumer agrees to two-week delay of Trump’s impeachment trial - POLITICO
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,564
10,242
136
I guess there’s still plenty of time for the House to send over another article of Impeachment lol:


The Justice Department’s top leaders listened in stunned silence this month: One of their peers, they were told, had devised a plan with President Donald J. Trump to oust Jeffrey A. Rosen as acting attorney general and wield the department’s power to force Georgia state lawmakers to overturn its presidential election results.

The unassuming lawyer who worked on the plan, Jeffrey Clark, had been devising ways to cast doubt on the election results and to bolster Mr. Trump’s continuing legal battles and the pressure on Georgia politicians. Because Mr. Rosen had refused the president’s entreaties to carry out those plans, Mr. Trump was about to decide whether to fire Mr. Rosen and replace him with Mr. Clark.

The department officials, convened on a conference call, then asked each other: What will you do if Mr. Rosen is dismissed?

The answer was unanimous. They would resign.

Their informal pact ultimately helped persuade Mr. Trump to keep Mr. Rosen in place, calculating that a furor over mass resignations at the top of the Justice Department would eclipse any attention on his baseless accusations of voter fraud.

Mr. Trump’s decision came only after Mr. Rosen and Mr. Clark made their competing cases to him in a bizarre White House meeting that two officials compared with an episode of Mr. Trump’s reality show “The Apprentice,” albeit one that could prompt a constitutional crisis.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,023
12,266
136
I guess there’s still plenty of time for the House to send over another article of Impeachment lol:


The Justice Department’s top leaders listened in stunned silence this month: One of their peers, they were told, had devised a plan with President Donald J. Trump to oust Jeffrey A. Rosen as acting attorney general and wield the department’s power to force Georgia state lawmakers to overturn its presidential election results.

The unassuming lawyer who worked on the plan, Jeffrey Clark, had been devising ways to cast doubt on the election results and to bolster Mr. Trump’s continuing legal battles and the pressure on Georgia politicians. Because Mr. Rosen had refused the president’s entreaties to carry out those plans, Mr. Trump was about to decide whether to fire Mr. Rosen and replace him with Mr. Clark.

The department officials, convened on a conference call, then asked each other: What will you do if Mr. Rosen is dismissed?

The answer was unanimous. They would resign.

Their informal pact ultimately helped persuade Mr. Trump to keep Mr. Rosen in place, calculating that a furor over mass resignations at the top of the Justice Department would eclipse any attention on his baseless accusations of voter fraud.

Mr. Trump’s decision came only after Mr. Rosen and Mr. Clark made their competing cases to him in a bizarre White House meeting that two officials compared with an episode of Mr. Trump’s reality show “The Apprentice,” albeit one that could prompt a constitutional crisis.
Was just about to post this. Throw another log on the impeachment fire.
 

esquared

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 8, 2000
25,093
6,203
146
Here's the Vanity Fair article linked in the tweet.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Roger Wilco

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,851
31,343
146
Wouldn’t it be more advantageous to let the evidence build?


There at a good enough schedule already. Technically, he senate trial can last as long as evidence can be gathered. Dems can decide, on their own, how long it needs to be. They can stop it as they wish. This isn't a legal proceeding and there is no actual judge making a determination--Roberts is just there to babysit.

Recall how mitch just got to decide whether or not to hold the trial. how long to debate and ask questions--whether to even allow evidence. Which he blocked....because he can.

Now, I agree that they shouldn't start now if it will just drag it out further while evidence continues to gather--that's just more time occupied on the impeachment over an extended period of time. Get Biden's peeps through over the next 2 weeks, and start the trial a good bit further ahead than you otherwise would be.

Though, I'm certainly curious what the Trump team actually means when they want to appeal for more time to get their case established--I mean, aren't they aware of their actual history of "preparing for cases" that relate to Trump? lol. They don't have the power of the GOP behind them to keep this shit silent. And it won't be silent. It will all be out there in public, however the GOP prepares to sabotage the final conviction, the facts will be presented and will be thoroughly public. Expect some of the known House GOP bitches to be brought in for questioning, too. I'm sure they can be subpoenaed, can't they?