IMO, that is too annoying and disjointed to read.
Twitter is terrible place to host a dissection of long speech, with it's tiny bit sized tidbits.
Find a transcript and do you own dissection (I did).
IMO there is little doubt that it's strong incitement speech that hammers the receptive audience, with stolen election that will destroy the country if they don't fight to stop it... It's easy to see how the believers would act on it. In fact it's hard to see how they wouldn't act.
But I still think it would fail to clear the bar for successful criminal prosecution. Trump is a career criminal/conman, and never comes right out and says: "Go beat down the police, storm the building, take hostages and make me President again".
He just tells them massive injustice has been done, that will destroy the country, if they don't act now. If you actually believe his lies, then it makes sense to act, to save the country from this injustice. His audience just believes all his lies at this point, so we got the predictable outcome.
Predictable in the sense that an angry mob would try to get to representatives and stop the confirmation. But you can't actually predict what the angry mob would destroy/achieve once unleashed.