"Im with her" slogan with arrow pointing to hillary. Is a crap slogan.

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Are the slogans used by the Clinton campaign good?

  • No they need better ones

  • Yes they are awesome and get people excited.


Results are only viewable after voting.

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,818
6,778
126
I don't believe that the slogan will matter much at all. It's clear from their choice of Trump that the Repub base is begging for an attitude adjustment. In that, Hillary will do her best to deliver an epic thrashing & will very likely deliver, too.

The lies & contradictions of modern Republicanism have finally boiled over into this mess, their mess. It's really between them. Most of America already sees Trump for President as absurd even if they don't care much for Hillary atm.

I'm sooo looking forward to the results of the conventions and some structured debates between the candidates. As we saw with the Benghazi hearings, she's very cool under fire. Donald? Not so much. She can do a lot to win people's confidence that's been eroded by decades of groundless attack & innuendo. The bullshit has a lot more air time than she ever got. Donald can't be anybody but himself, an absurd candidate. I'm sure he'll convince millions to finally see it that way.

How could any intellectually superior liberal disagree?
 

flexy

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
8,464
155
106
This design/slogan is bad for MANY reason, some subtle, some not so much.

From a psychology perspective, "I am with her" and the "->" implies someone else [otherwise there wouldn't be an arrow needed], and the "with her" also implies there is another person involved....basically "needing to show" people what the right choice is and WHERE it is.

(Subconscious psychology there).

This makes me wonder, why would need this person a helping arrow and point out that someone "is with her" (rather than "with the other")? This is MUCH worse than a good, catchy slogan, and I admit Trump's "Make America Great Again", as dumb as it is, is brilliant.

By the way Sanders also made a really bad one, he has some "explain democratic socialism" memes up on facebook featuring the shaking hands....which I think are incredibly bad, they highly remind me of actual communist logos/designs..the style is similar. AWFUL. Not that "shaking hands" would in any way represent social democracy well, could have been much better just some stylized persons/heads to represent people/society etc.
 

Hugo Drax

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2011
5,647
47
91
This design/slogan is bad for MANY reason, some subtle, some not so much.

From a psychology perspective, "I am with her" and the "->" implies someone else [otherwise there wouldn't be an arrow needed], and the "with her" also implies there is another person involved....basically "needing to show" people what the right choice is and WHERE it is.

(Subconscious psychology there).

This makes me wonder, why would need this person a helping arrow and point out that someone "is with her" (rather than "with the other")? This is MUCH worse than a good, catchy slogan, and I admit Trump's "Make America Great Again", as dumb as it is, is brilliant.

By the way Sanders also made a really bad one, he has some "explain democratic socialism" memes up on facebook featuring the shaking hands....which I think are incredibly bad, they highly remind me of actual communist logos/designs..the style is similar. AWFUL. Not that "shaking hands" would in any way represent social democracy well, could have been much better just some stylized persons/heads to represent people/society etc.

Bernies Slogan is "A future to Believe in"

I think thats a great slogan as well. But "Im With Her ->" Jeez what the hell are they thinking.

Jeb! and then Jeb! can Fix it. Two stupid slogans. It seems these tired old career politicians just have way too many muddle managers coming up with crap slogans.
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
Hillary can't win those people. They're already birther/benghazi believers. They're outrage addicts whose intellects have been poisoned.

She most certainly CAN, but not in droves. Ignorance is a disease, and the DNC/Hillary Campaign best not ignore it or write it off. It must be actively fought. In that area, having Trump and all his outrageous buffoonery as her opponent is a godsend. Even the most recalcitrant birther/benghazi conspiracy theorist can be shamed enough to support anything resembling reason. Trump is just the candidate to provide her the rhetorical ammunition.
 

Hugo Drax

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2011
5,647
47
91
Looks like Trump things "Im with her" is stupid as well and chose "Im with you" as a way to poke fun of that slogan.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,615
17,189
136
Looks like Trump things "Im with her" is stupid as well and chose "Im with you" as a way to poke fun of that slogan.

Thanks for the update! I was just thinking about whether or not trump thought Hillary had a good slogan or not. Its an important issue and one I'm glad you highlighted!






/S
 

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
C'mon, 'America First' isn't reminding anyone of Nazis. It's just the best. It can't stop winning. It's yuge.