"Im with her" slogan with arrow pointing to hillary. Is a crap slogan.

[Knowing]

What was "hope and change"?

The exact same thing. Which makes it even more amazing that "Bush did it" was their go-to excuse for everything.

 

[buckshot24]

She's already ripped into him as a fraudster over Trump U & a dangerous idiot over Foreign policy. And she's just warming up. She's been dying to kick Republican ass for a very long while. When she gets done with Trump his former Repub rivals will be glad it wasn't them.

Too bad the FBI is hounding her over her lies about her emails. If Trump keeps making stupid comments about the heritage of judges it may not matter if Hillary has an orange suit on when she's sworn in.

Hillary is vulnerable with foreign policy whether you admit it or not.

 

[buckshot24]

The exact same thing. Which makes it even more amazing that "Bush did it" was their go-to excuse for everything.

Right, hacks can't see simple things like this.

 

[soundforbjt]

Drumpf "borrowed" his slogan from Saint Ronnie's 1980 campaign. No originality by Drumpf. Same with his America First, that was from the 1930's.

 

[Painman]

"I'm With Her"

"Fighting for Us"

It sucks, because it sets up an ingroup/outgroup dynamic right from the get go.

Who the fuck is she, and who the fuck are you.

 

[brycejones]

Right, hacks can't see simple things like this.

The irony in this statement is awesome!

 

[Fanatical Meat]

It's not overthinking when it is the first thing that comes to mind.

Kind of like Hillary's "red arrow pointing to the right" logo...pretty weird imagery for a "progressive" candidate.


What do you think the red star on the Heineken bottle looks like to a middle aged Eastern European?

Yeah...they're probably just "over thinking".





.

Not so sure about Heineken, nor do I care but Hillarys' right pointing arrow is from some marketing douchbag who probably said people read left to right so pointing the arrow right will appear forward.

 

[FerrelGeek]

It's because she fundamentally stands for nothing other than 'get someone with a vag in the white house - it's my effing turn!'. She's a soulless moral windsock who is completely incapable of relating to people.

Sigh, the usual disclaimer must follow - not a Trumpista.

That was a good slogan as well. Somehow Clinton seems to be having a difficult time finding a good slogan for her campaign.

 

[Jhhnn]

Too bad the FBI is hounding her over her lies about her emails. If Trump keeps making stupid comments about the heritage of judges it may not matter if Hillary has an orange suit on when she's sworn in.

Hillary is vulnerable with foreign policy whether you admit it or not.

Yeh, too bad the right wing is making false attributions about the FBI & speculating wildly about the nature & scope of their investigation that was launched at the request of the intelligence community IG rather than as a law enforcement initiative. And it's too bad for them that indictment against Hillary has been a fluffed up right wing pipe dream about a likely as bigfoot emerging from the woods to give a press conference.

Now that you brought it up, the chances of fraud charges being brought against the Donald seem a lot more likely.

 

[buckshot24]

Yeh, too bad the right wing is making false attributions about the FBI & speculating wildly about the nature & scope of their investigation that was launched at the request of the intelligence community IG rather than as a law enforcement initiative. And it's too bad for them that indictment against Hillary has been a fluffed up right wing pipe dream about a likely as bigfoot emerging from the woods to give a press conference.

Now that you brought it up, the chances of fraud charges being brought against the Donald seem a lot more likely.

I don't expect you to see her vulnerabilities on this. You don't count, you're too far gone.

 

[Jhhnn]

I don't expect you to see her vulnerabilities on this. You don't count, you're too far gone.

I think her vulnerabilities are confined to those of public perception among the gullible & well conditioned receptors of sensationalist conspiracy theory. It's starting to look like every other right wing conspiracy theory scandal from Whitewater forward. The perps call bullshit & then bring it in by the truckload so that there really is bullshit, def a helluva lot more than was ever there in the first place. It's a practical application of Brandolini's law.

That's done to move public perception away from matters of policy, ideology & actual performance, about what works & what doesn't, about how to deal constructively with the realities & challenges we face.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

It's because she fundamentally stands for nothing other than 'get someone with a vag in the white house - it's my effing turn!'. She's a soulless moral windsock who is completely incapable of relating to people.

Sigh, the usual disclaimer must follow - not a Trumpista.

Funny I don't have a problem with a woman running just because she competent and a woman. Why not try a different perspective.
I once worked for a large (fortune 50 company) and there were occasional roles that would come up and the only skill you needed was organization and communication ability. Everything else was acquired thru training. The Manager of was a woman who was all about opportunity for women. For years she only hired young women, they were good candidates and did good work but it was odd. People started talking and even the dozen or so women on her team started to say its time to get some older people and men. She had ultimately started hiring more diverse candidates. I don't think voting for a woman to be President for the sake of getting a different perspective is strange at all.

 

[Hugo Drax]

I wonder why Elisabeth Warren did not run? She would have been 1000x better candidate.

But the Hillary Slogans really need to go and something much better needs to replace them. "Im with her" really stinks it is amazing that this was the best they can do?

 

[Knowing]

I think her vulnerabilities are confined to those of public perception among the gullible & well conditioned receptors of sensationalist conspiracy theory.

So you don't think she's a hawk responsible, in part, for the destabilization of a few more middle eastern countries, who shows derision for record keeping rules, while demonstrating a belief that she alone is entitled to the presidency?

Funny I don't have a problem with a woman running just because she competent and a woman. Why not try a different perspective.

The best boss I ever had was a woman full stop. I have nothing against females in positions of authority. I wouldn't elect Hillary to run an ant farm and it has nothing to do with her "birth assigned gender" or "gender expression."

 

[Jhhnn]

So you don't think she's a hawk responsible, in part, for the destabilization of a few more middle eastern countries, who shows derision for record keeping rules, while demonstrating a belief that she alone is entitled to the presidency?

The frame of reference was her email.

It's hard to imagine how she's vulnerable to Repub attacks over being too hawkish, certainly not while they adhere to the Neocon persuasion. The doublespeak is awesome, however.

It's hard to give credibility to criticism of her email practices when they're coming from a political establishment who disappeared a few million of their own amidst controversy over the outing of a CIA agent.

There's no entitlement about it. She's worked hard to be where she is. It's not like she inherited a real estate empire.

 

[Knowing]

The frame of reference was her email.

It's hard to imagine how she's vulnerable to Repub attacks over being too hawkish, certainly not while they adhere to the Neocon persuasion. The doublespeak is awesome, however.

It's hard to give credibility to criticism of her email practices when they're coming from a political establishment who disappeared a few million of their own amidst controversy over the outing of a CIA agent.

There's no entitlement about it. She's worked hard to be where she is. It's not like she inherited a real estate empire.

Okay, now try that again. This time without the flawed assumption that I'm hawkish, a Republican, or incapable of using email.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

 

[sm625]

It's actually kind of smart because it implies the choice is either "I'm with her" or "I'm with stupid".

 

[Jhhnn]

Okay, now try that again. This time without the flawed assumption that I'm hawkish, a Republican, or incapable of using email.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

I offered none of those things. I spoke in terms of the election & the relative credibility of the contestants.

There's a real & unavoidable choice to be made that requires the weighing of relative merits if we're to act as an informed electorate & play our part in Democracy. Or not. We can just let our fears & prejudices guide us instead. Or wish we had a pony.

 

[Bart*Simpson]

Because for a lot of Americans its not so great. For people like Hillary Clinton and Trump, America is super great.

For the student with 80K in debt with college loans working a Mcjob, its not great.

there is a reason lots of young americans are voting for Sanders.

This slogan just fails.

The "H" with the arrow in it looks like a street sign directing you to a hospital.

 

[Knowing]

After Obama the Republicans don't have a monopoly on war in even this generation. Where the criticism of her email practices came from is irrelevant, she was wrong knowingly and intentionally. Not only that, she's lied about it repeatedly. She hasn't worked hard enough to successfully manage two devices or two coups.

The only way I vote for the Republican candidate is if Hillary is on the other side. It would be my first time voting for a major party candidate bee-tee-dubs. So you can stop with the subtle Trump bashing.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

 

[ivwshane]

After Obama the Republicans don't have a monopoly on war in even this generation. Where the criticism of her email practices came from is irrelevant, she was wrong knowingly and intentionally. Not only that, she's lied about it repeatedly. She hasn't worked hard enough to successfully manage two devices or two coups.

The only way I vote for the Republican candidate is if Hillary is on the other side. It would be my first time voting for a major party candidate bee-tee-dubs. So you can stop with the subtle Trump bashing.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

I suggest you get the relevant info to the FBI and the Benghazi committee, they could use some cold, hard, indisputable facts that I'm sure you have to support your claims.

 

[Knowing]

Who said anything about Benghazi?

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

 

[ivwshane]

Who said anything about Benghazi?

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Who the fuck do you think started the email investigation?!

 

[Knowing]

Who the fuck do you think started the email investigation?!

What difference, at this point, does it make?


Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

 

[ivwshane]

What difference, at this point, does it make?


Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Not a whole lot, you appear to be another low information voter who can't be bothered with the facts, let alone bothered to remove your dumb tapatalk signature.