Fraudulent illegal voters are kind of like cockroaches, there's always more than you can easily find.
You won't listen to this, but it is sound inferential and statistical logic.
There are 165,000 voting precincts in the United States. There are 50 states which oversee voter integrity. If there were any significant voter fraud, we would know it from whatever number of those independent, bipartisan-administered precincts.
Add to that the nature of reality. There IS absolute truth, but only in a sense of probability. It makes a good strategy in the Christmas season to avoid jury duty, because simply mention of a scientific approach in the context of legal standards will get the defense attorney to remove you from the jury pool.
The legal standard of "Truth" is biased in the rules of evidence and procedure in favor of letting some guilty go free in order to protect the innocent. Thus, it was noted during the Zimmerman trial in Florida that he was "Not Guilty," as opposed to "Innocent."
If you find evidence of a crime, you gather more evidence to build a case against the intended bias of the judicial system. You follow a trail of evidence based on successive hypotheses given what you already found. If that standard had been applied during congress's "Benghazi witchhunt," millions of dollars would have been saved, because -- "There was no THERE there."
Instead, we're looking at the possibility of some statistical scatter of crimes, with the thought of "correcting the process" in voting. In serious scientific application of statistics, there is a distinction between "statistically significant" and insignificant.
There was, for instance, a Trump voter (Wisconsin?) who was caught trying to vote twice. A single instance of voter fraud. There may have been a few others, in whatever states they may have occurred. And there is this woman in Texas.
But as for chasing cockroaches, if 165,000 precincts and 50 states acting independently could not turn up more than a handful, it would be like calling Terminix exterminators to fumigate and kill -- probably -- the cockroach that was seen.
Statistical reality itself should be an indicator as to how much time, effort and money should be spent in finding those mythical fraudulent voters.
Your "champion" -- the Disgusting Slug and his entourage of sycophants and Liars -- wants to make this a big issue because he lost the popular vote. He would love to grandstand with massive spending to prove nothing. Because there is nothing to prove -- of any significance. You can continue to spit in all of our faces to assert the Lie that the Pig won the popular vote, or there were 3 million fraudulent votes in California because of an estimated 3 million illegals. But it abandons the Truth, and chases the Lie.
And if that's what your delusional ignorant mind wants to do, tell me you're an upstanding fine American when you're out of gas in Death Valley needing a drink. I grant you that -- by spitting in your disgusting Tory Traitor face.
PS This is my personal Fort Sumter. Democrats -- or Republicans who voted against Trump -- don't HATE him. We F***ing DESPISE HIM! And his most ardent supporters aren't "deplorable." They are DESPICABLE. So -- go on, now! Take over another BLM Wildlife Refuge. Or raid Harper's Ferry. See ya in Hell.