Indus
Diamond Member
- May 11, 2002
- 9,924
- 6,509
- 136
They face justice for their crimes.
Yeah right.. 90 days for rape..
https://newsmaven.io/pinacnews/cour...an-to-90-days-in-jail-eRAn1Kqn_ECIzMgLKVUiJg/
They face justice for their crimes.
Have Republicans dispatched thoughts and prayers already?
Yes, in this case it absoltuely did. A man here ILLEGALLY that shouldn't have been here and likely wouldn't have been here without sanctuary laws killed a cop. And you leftists can't even fess up to it, you're so deranged you're choosing this guy over the legal immigrant that contributed to society. It really is sad how powerful TDS is, how warped your thinking becomes.
@Moonbeam Hey Moonie, check it out. The polar opposite of CBD.
What about them? How does that relate to this story? I hope ever SOB in the links you provided faces justice. Your post has nothing to do with an illegal immigrant killing a citizen that gave back to his community.
Doesn't that leave us in the same place? Because of state policy, a fellow who shouldn't have been here and had already been arrested twice, killed a cop to avoid a third DUI.
I don't see any way to put a positive spin on that. Why can't we have an effective and semi logical immigration policy that all of the states adhere to? It's not unreasonable for a nation to control it's borders, it's not unreasonable to deport those that enter illegally and commit crimes. The problem seems to be that we've decided this is a Trump thing and not a United States thing. We hate the message because we hate the messenger.
Immigrants aren't a bad thing, I know a bunch of them, I'm an immigrant. But we need to get past the crazy and into the logic, we need a system that helps others and helps the US. The system we have now has failed completely, it's time to fix it.
Cops kill more cops than any other cohort, why post about an isolated incident?
Well unless youre into race baiting. Nah, impossible.
Because ( In your world) if somebody is going to kill cops and rape women, they DAMN WELL BETTER BE AMERICANS!
Patronize home industry! View attachment 2035
Doesn't that leave us in the same place? Because of state policy, a fellow who shouldn't have been here and had already been arrested twice, killed a cop to avoid a third DUI.
I don't see any way to put a positive spin on that. Why can't we have an effective and semi logical immigration policy that all of the states adhere to? It's not unreasonable for a nation to control it's borders, it's not unreasonable to deport those that enter illegally and commit crimes. The problem seems to be that we've decided this is a Trump thing and not a United States thing. We hate the message because we hate the messenger.
Immigrants aren't a bad thing, I know a bunch of them, I'm an immigrant. But we need to get past the crazy and into the logic, we need a system that helps others and helps the US. The system we have now has failed completely, it's time to fix it.
Sanctuary city and state policies predate Trump, they have little to do with him. In fact, sanctuary state policies are part of the bedrock principles that the US is founded on, the sovereignty of states.
Conservatives were big fans of the tenth amendment until liberals used it for things they didn’t like.
Okay but what are the point of laws at the federal level if states can simply not observe or enforce them? Why even have them?
Want Gun control? Okay, guns require 5 rounds of background checks and 2 rounds of interviews.
Texas: We won't observe that law. You can buy them over the counter here.
Works both ways.
And we're still right back where we started. The state protected a criminal and that criminal killed a cop. That's bad policy.Sanctuary city and state policies predate Trump, they have little to do with him. In fact, sanctuary state policies are part of the bedrock principles that the US is founded on, the sovereignty of states.
Conservatives were big fans of the tenth amendment until liberals used it for things they didn’t like.
And we're still right back where we started. The state protected a criminal and that criminal killed a cop. That's bad policy.
And we're still right back where we started. The state protected a criminal and that criminal killed a cop. That's bad policy.
Which of these two situations is better?
A) Five cops were killed this month, four by citizens that disregarded the law and one by an illegal alien that shouldn't have been here but was due to sanctuary laws.
B) Four cops were killed this month by citizens that disregarded the law.
I don't know what you mean by "saner". How are the laws no sane now?Only if we are rating policies purely by their worst outcomes. You could say the same thing about parole - someone gets paroled and then kills someone. Should we eliminate parole?
Cities are declining to expend resources to enforce irrational and pointless immigration laws. We should concentrate on making our immigration laws saner, not wondering why more people don’t want to jump onboard with them.
Only if we are rating policies purely by their worst outcomes. You could say the same thing about parole - someone gets paroled and then kills someone. Should we eliminate parole?
Cities are declining to expend resources to enforce irrational and pointless immigration laws. We should concentrate on making our immigration laws saner, not wondering why more people don’t want to jump onboard with them.