if you had a hot first cousin

[ElFenix]

speaking of cousin loving, what ever happened to luvya?

 

[SunSamurai]

Originally posted by: Fayd

Originally posted by: SunSamurai

Originally posted by: Fayd

Originally posted by: SunSamurai
Had a hot cousin and hell no. 2nd cousins and beyond. It sounds like alot of you are the product of such a union.

haha, so you make a clear cut? 1st cousin definitely no, 2nd cousin definitely okay?

Sorry if you think fucking almost full blooded relatives is ok. Genetically 2nd cousin and on is not a risk.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_couple
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consanguinity

But what happens if they are related to each other? Consider the following: A parent transmits to their offspring one of the two copies they have of each gene. If one of the parents is a carrier, then the chances are 1/2 that their children will also be carriers. Given that cystic fibrosis is a relatively common genetic disease, it works out that the chances that two siblings will both be carriers of cystic fibrosis is 1/50, as compared to 1/625 for two unrelated persons. For first cousins, the risk is 1/200 and for second cousins, the risk is the same as if they were unrelated. PKU is a rarer genetic disease that if untreated, will cause severe mental retardation. The occurrence is 1/12000 live births. The chances that two unrelated people are carriers is 1/2500. For two siblings, the risk 1/100, for first cousins, it is 1/400 and for second cousins, it is 1/1600. Thus, the real risk is with brother-sister marriages, and to a lesser extent, first cousin marriages. Any relations beyond these are essentially at the same risk as the general population.

http://www.globalgraffiti.com/family/cousin.htm

you dont seem to understand the question.

it is assuming that NO CHILDREN WILL RESULT FROM SAID UNION!

thus, the issue with genetics is taken out. the only thing left is the issue of incest as a moral and social taboo.

Go ahead and do your sister and mom too then and you can just call it a moral or social issue. Its fucked and so are alot of people in here that thought they could share a sick truth because they thought it would be accepted.

 

[JEDIYoda]

Originally posted by: Fayd
would you tap it?

(assuming you're smart enough to use protection, and noone catches you in the act.)

(this post brought to you as part one of my "hypothetically.." series.)

That`s like asking if your sister was hot would you tap it....

 

[SunSamurai]

This is what happens when you try and tap your first cousin and the condom screws up! http://forums.anandtech.com/me...=2315905&enterthread=y

 

[Fayd]

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda

Originally posted by: Fayd
would you tap it?

(assuming you're smart enough to use protection, and noone catches you in the act.)

(this post brought to you as part one of my "hypothetically.." series.)

That`s like asking if your sister was hot would you tap it....

well... would you?

 

[Fayd]

Originally posted by: SunSamurai

Originally posted by: Fayd

Originally posted by: SunSamurai

Originally posted by: Fayd

Originally posted by: SunSamurai
Had a hot cousin and hell no. 2nd cousins and beyond. It sounds like alot of you are the product of such a union.

haha, so you make a clear cut? 1st cousin definitely no, 2nd cousin definitely okay?

Sorry if you think fucking almost full blooded relatives is ok. Genetically 2nd cousin and on is not a risk.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_couple
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consanguinity

But what happens if they are related to each other? Consider the following: A parent transmits to their offspring one of the two copies they have of each gene. If one of the parents is a carrier, then the chances are 1/2 that their children will also be carriers. Given that cystic fibrosis is a relatively common genetic disease, it works out that the chances that two siblings will both be carriers of cystic fibrosis is 1/50, as compared to 1/625 for two unrelated persons. For first cousins, the risk is 1/200 and for second cousins, the risk is the same as if they were unrelated. PKU is a rarer genetic disease that if untreated, will cause severe mental retardation. The occurrence is 1/12000 live births. The chances that two unrelated people are carriers is 1/2500. For two siblings, the risk 1/100, for first cousins, it is 1/400 and for second cousins, it is 1/1600. Thus, the real risk is with brother-sister marriages, and to a lesser extent, first cousin marriages. Any relations beyond these are essentially at the same risk as the general population.

http://www.globalgraffiti.com/family/cousin.htm

you dont seem to understand the question.

it is assuming that NO CHILDREN WILL RESULT FROM SAID UNION!

thus, the issue with genetics is taken out. the only thing left is the issue of incest as a moral and social taboo.

Go ahead and do your sister and mom too then and you can just call it a moral or social issue. Its fucked and so are alot of people in here that thought they could share a sick truth because they thought it would be accepted.

haha, man, you take some things too seriously.

 

[Fayd]

Originally posted by: SunSamurai
This is what happens when you try and tap your first cousin and the condom screws up! http://forums.anandtech.com/me...=2315905&enterthread=y

i would have said that the woman was the result of the condom screwup, not that thread.

but whatever

 

[irishScott]

I have a hot cousin and no I never would. I've known her since day one, it'd be like tapping my sister. *shudders at picosecond long mental image*

 

[GiggleGirl]

Originally posted by: SunSamurai
To further my claim that 1rst cousins = youre a sick bastage, but 2nd and on cousins = free game

Second cousins are fifth degree relatives and are predicted to share 3.1% (1/32) of their genes. In contrast, first cousins are predicted to share 12.5 % (1/8) of their genes. The closer the biological relationship is between parents, the greater proportion of genes shared, and the greater the chance to have a child with birth defects.

The background risk that every couple faces of having children with birth defects is about 2-3%. Genetic counseling will help define this for you personally based on your family history and ethnic background.

http://www.medhelp.org/posts/G...ond-cousin/show/412667

i have cousins whos parents are my mom's brother, and my dad's sister................. oh noezzzz

 

[arkcom]

Originally posted by: GiggleGirl

Originally posted by: SunSamurai
To further my claim that 1rst cousins = youre a sick bastage, but 2nd and on cousins = free game

Second cousins are fifth degree relatives and are predicted to share 3.1% (1/32) of their genes. In contrast, first cousins are predicted to share 12.5 % (1/8) of their genes. The closer the biological relationship is between parents, the greater proportion of genes shared, and the greater the chance to have a child with birth defects.

The background risk that every couple faces of having children with birth defects is about 2-3%. Genetic counseling will help define this for you personally based on your family history and ethnic background.

http://www.medhelp.org/posts/G...ond-cousin/show/412667

i have cousins whos parents are my mom's brother, and my dad's sister................. oh noezzzz

I think that makes them genetically similar to your brother/sister since you share all four grandparents.

 

[GiggleGirl]

Originally posted by: arkcom

Originally posted by: GiggleGirl

Originally posted by: SunSamurai
To further my claim that 1rst cousins = youre a sick bastage, but 2nd and on cousins = free game

Second cousins are fifth degree relatives and are predicted to share 3.1% (1/32) of their genes. In contrast, first cousins are predicted to share 12.5 % (1/8) of their genes. The closer the biological relationship is between parents, the greater proportion of genes shared, and the greater the chance to have a child with birth defects.

The background risk that every couple faces of having children with birth defects is about 2-3%. Genetic counseling will help define this for you personally based on your family history and ethnic background.

http://www.medhelp.org/posts/G...ond-cousin/show/412667

i have cousins whos parents are my mom's brother, and my dad's sister................. oh noezzzz

I think that makes them genetically similar to your brother/sister since you share all four grandparents.

exactly what i was thinking. one of those cousins is super hot too.... euuwwww but i would never do him!

 

[SunSamurai]

Originally posted by: GiggleGirl

Originally posted by: SunSamurai
To further my claim that 1rst cousins = youre a sick bastage, but 2nd and on cousins = free game

Second cousins are fifth degree relatives and are predicted to share 3.1% (1/32) of their genes. In contrast, first cousins are predicted to share 12.5 % (1/8) of their genes. The closer the biological relationship is between parents, the greater proportion of genes shared, and the greater the chance to have a child with birth defects.

The background risk that every couple faces of having children with birth defects is about 2-3%. Genetic counseling will help define this for you personally based on your family history and ethnic background.

http://www.medhelp.org/posts/G...ond-cousin/show/412667

i have cousins whos parents are my mom's brother, and my dad's sister................. oh noezzzz

That just sounds like two separate families had more than one connection. We are talking about you going after your blood relatives, so I dont see whats up with the "oh nooeezz" unless youre confused. It looks like if you did go after a cousin withing that space you would be at even higher risk though.

So basically you just called someone between a brother(sister?) and a cousin, genetically, 'super hot'.

I'm gonna pretend its a girl.

 

[GiggleGirl]

Originally posted by: SunSamurai

Originally posted by: GiggleGirl

Originally posted by: SunSamurai
To further my claim that 1rst cousins = youre a sick bastage, but 2nd and on cousins = free game

Second cousins are fifth degree relatives and are predicted to share 3.1% (1/32) of their genes. In contrast, first cousins are predicted to share 12.5 % (1/8) of their genes. The closer the biological relationship is between parents, the greater proportion of genes shared, and the greater the chance to have a child with birth defects.

The background risk that every couple faces of having children with birth defects is about 2-3%. Genetic counseling will help define this for you personally based on your family history and ethnic background.

http://www.medhelp.org/posts/G...ond-cousin/show/412667

i have cousins whos parents are my mom's brother, and my dad's sister................. oh noezzzz

That just sounds like two separate families had more than one connection. We are talking about you going after your blood relatives, so I dont see whats up with the "oh nooeezz" unless youre confused. It looks like if you did go after a cousin withing that space you would be at even higher risk though.

So basically you just called someone between a brother(sister?) and a cousin, genetically, 'super hot'.

I'm gonna pretend its a girl.

the oh nooeezz was a joke.
i would never screw my cousin (who is a guy) and im a girl...

 

[ChAoTiCpInOy]

so why is a first cousin relationship such a taboo in our culture?

 

[alkemyst]

Originally posted by: ChAoTiCpInOy
so why is a first cousin relationship such a taboo in our culture?

because pregnancy can lead to a really fucked up kid.

There are enough women out there not to risk that.

 

[ChAoTiCpInOy]

Originally posted by: alkemyst

Originally posted by: ChAoTiCpInOy
so why is a first cousin relationship such a taboo in our culture?

because pregnancy can lead to a really fucked up kid.

There are enough women out there not to risk that.

I don't think people even think about that at first.

 

[alkemyst]

Originally posted by: ChAoTiCpInOy

Originally posted by: alkemyst

Originally posted by: ChAoTiCpInOy
so why is a first cousin relationship such a taboo in our culture?

because pregnancy can lead to a really fucked up kid.

There are enough women out there not to risk that.

I don't think people even think about that at first.

because most people are weak-minded sheep. They will buy into something due to everyone else doing so, meanwhile they know nothing about the details.

 

[ChAoTiCpInOy]

Originally posted by: alkemyst

Originally posted by: ChAoTiCpInOy

Originally posted by: alkemyst

Originally posted by: ChAoTiCpInOy
so why is a first cousin relationship such a taboo in our culture?

because pregnancy can lead to a really fucked up kid.

There are enough women out there not to risk that.

I don't think people even think about that at first.

because most people are weak-minded sheep. They will buy into something due to everyone else doing so, meanwhile they know nothing about the details.

So what are you trying to say?

 

[MovingTarget]

I'd hate to see a lot of you guys at a family reunion.

 

[alkemyst]

Originally posted by: ChAoTiCpInOy

Originally posted by: alkemyst

Originally posted by: ChAoTiCpInOy

Originally posted by: alkemyst

Originally posted by: ChAoTiCpInOy
so why is a first cousin relationship such a taboo in our culture?

because pregnancy can lead to a really fucked up kid.

There are enough women out there not to risk that.

I don't think people even think about that at first.

because most people are weak-minded sheep. They will buy into something due to everyone else doing so, meanwhile they know nothing about the details.

So what are you trying to say?

That most people think that something is wrong without really knowing why.

First cousin relationships were very popular centuries ago. You figure two kids more or less grew up seeing alot of each other, having the same value/religion/etc structure, heard always good things about each other.

It sort of just fit in. However; once these relationships went to having kids it was evident that the common terrible recessive genes usually shared by cousins were too much a risk

This is the main reason that lead to FIRST cousin relationships being illegal, usually at the second level or beyond those recessive genes that can cause issues aren't so probable.

 

[geno]

would you tap it? (Total Votes: 555)
yes
298 votes 53.69 (%)


no
257 votes 46.31 (%)

Jesus fucking christ, I hope most of those yes answers are a joke :Q

 

[SunSamurai]

I already outline the probabilities. 2nd and on has teh same chance of birth defects as non blood related. 1st is just fucking sick.

 

[Stumps]

HMMM judging from the results...the bulk of ATOT comes from the Southern US states....

 

[ThePresence]

I have cousins, 2 sisters, absolutely smoking. Hottest girls I've ever seen.
I doubt I'd be able to resist if given the chance, no matter what my brain tells me.

 

[rh71]

Originally posted by: ThePresence
I have cousins, 2 sisters, absolutely smoking. Hottest girls I've ever seen.
I doubt I'd be able to resist if given the chance, no matter what my brain tells me.

even your sisters? I never had a sister and wouldn't know... but isn't it the same thought as mom?