if you had a hot first cousin

Page 10 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

TruePaige

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2006
9,874
2
0
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: iamanidiot
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: ChAoTiCpInOy
So has anyone figured out if the OP was asking because he didn't know what to do with his cousin?

umm.. no, that's not why i asked.

it's a hypothetical thread. meant to make some laughs. it succeeded.

btw, i voted no.

who the hell even cares? Who cares about anything anymore? Everyone is an assponcho.

is this the evolution of asshat and dickscarf?

PenisPoncho.

sounds like a line of extremely thick condoms.

Thick for her pleasure...of not raising your retard babies.

Man I should work in advertising...
 

SunSamurai

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2005
3,914
0
0
Had a hot cousin and hell no. 2nd cousins and beyond. It sounds like alot of you are the product of such a union.
 

ChAoTiCpInOy

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2006
6,442
1
81
I think it's a issue in culture. Culturally before it was acceptable right? To marry a first cousin? To keep the blood line strong? I know royalty did it...
 

Locut0s

Lifer
Nov 28, 2001
22,205
43
91
Originally posted by: ChAoTiCpInOy
I think it's a issue in culture. Culturally before it was acceptable right? To marry a first cousin? To keep the blood line strong? I know royalty did it...

Almost all taboos are cultural. Even if they have a biological backing the reason that holds the most force in stopping someone from doing these things is usually cultural.
 

Fayd

Diamond Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,970
2
76
www.manwhoring.com
Originally posted by: SunSamurai
Had a hot cousin and hell no. 2nd cousins and beyond. It sounds like alot of you are the product of such a union.

haha, so you make a clear cut? 1st cousin definitely no, 2nd cousin definitely okay?
 

Fayd

Diamond Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,970
2
76
www.manwhoring.com
Originally posted by: middlehead
Realistically, it'd depend on how close they were in growing up. I've got first cousins that I completely forget about when counting off family members because I spent so little time around them in childhood, and then a cousin who I consider to be my sister.

so...which one would you be okay with nailing? :p
 

SunSamurai

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2005
3,914
0
0
Originally posted by: ChAoTiCpInOy
I think it's a issue in culture. Culturally before it was acceptable right? To marry a first cousin? To keep the blood line strong? I know royalty did it...

Its an issue with GENETICS you fool.
 

SunSamurai

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2005
3,914
0
0
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: SunSamurai
Had a hot cousin and hell no. 2nd cousins and beyond. It sounds like alot of you are the product of such a union.

haha, so you make a clear cut? 1st cousin definitely no, 2nd cousin definitely okay?

Sorry if you think fucking almost full blooded relatives is ok. Genetically 2nd cousin and on is not a risk.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_couple
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consanguinity



But what happens if they are related to each other? Consider the following: A parent transmits to their offspring one of the two copies they have of each gene. If one of the parents is a carrier, then the chances are 1/2 that their children will also be carriers. Given that cystic fibrosis is a relatively common genetic disease, it works out that the chances that two siblings will both be carriers of cystic fibrosis is 1/50, as compared to 1/625 for two unrelated persons. For first cousins, the risk is 1/200 and for second cousins, the risk is the same as if they were unrelated. PKU is a rarer genetic disease that if untreated, will cause severe mental retardation. The occurrence is 1/12000 live births. The chances that two unrelated people are carriers is 1/2500. For two siblings, the risk 1/100, for first cousins, it is 1/400 and for second cousins, it is 1/1600. Thus, the real risk is with brother-sister marriages, and to a lesser extent, first cousin marriages. Any relations beyond these are essentially at the same risk as the general population.
http://www.globalgraffiti.com/family/cousin.htm
 

SunSamurai

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2005
3,914
0
0
To further my claim that 1rst cousins = youre a sick bastage, but 2nd and on cousins = free game

Second cousins are fifth degree relatives and are predicted to share 3.1% (1/32) of their genes. In contrast, first cousins are predicted to share 12.5 % (1/8) of their genes. The closer the biological relationship is between parents, the greater proportion of genes shared, and the greater the chance to have a child with birth defects.

The background risk that every couple faces of having children with birth defects is about 2-3%. Genetic counseling will help define this for you personally based on your family history and ethnic background.

http://www.medhelp.org/posts/G...ond-cousin/show/412667
 

Fayd

Diamond Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,970
2
76
www.manwhoring.com
Originally posted by: SunSamurai
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: SunSamurai
Had a hot cousin and hell no. 2nd cousins and beyond. It sounds like alot of you are the product of such a union.

haha, so you make a clear cut? 1st cousin definitely no, 2nd cousin definitely okay?

Sorry if you think fucking almost full blooded relatives is ok. Genetically 2nd cousin and on is not a risk.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_couple
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consanguinity



But what happens if they are related to each other? Consider the following: A parent transmits to their offspring one of the two copies they have of each gene. If one of the parents is a carrier, then the chances are 1/2 that their children will also be carriers. Given that cystic fibrosis is a relatively common genetic disease, it works out that the chances that two siblings will both be carriers of cystic fibrosis is 1/50, as compared to 1/625 for two unrelated persons. For first cousins, the risk is 1/200 and for second cousins, the risk is the same as if they were unrelated. PKU is a rarer genetic disease that if untreated, will cause severe mental retardation. The occurrence is 1/12000 live births. The chances that two unrelated people are carriers is 1/2500. For two siblings, the risk 1/100, for first cousins, it is 1/400 and for second cousins, it is 1/1600. Thus, the real risk is with brother-sister marriages, and to a lesser extent, first cousin marriages. Any relations beyond these are essentially at the same risk as the general population.
http://www.globalgraffiti.com/family/cousin.htm

you dont seem to understand the question.

it is assuming that NO CHILDREN WILL RESULT FROM SAID UNION!

thus, the issue with genetics is taken out. the only thing left is the issue of incest as a moral and social taboo.
 

lifeobry

Golden Member
Oct 24, 2008
1,325
0
0
Anyone that says no obviously has no hot cousins. No seriously, your cousins aren't hot, don't even bother replying, unless with pics.
 

ChAoTiCpInOy

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2006
6,442
1
81
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: SunSamurai
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: SunSamurai
Had a hot cousin and hell no. 2nd cousins and beyond. It sounds like alot of you are the product of such a union.

haha, so you make a clear cut? 1st cousin definitely no, 2nd cousin definitely okay?

Sorry if you think fucking almost full blooded relatives is ok. Genetically 2nd cousin and on is not a risk.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_couple
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consanguinity



But what happens if they are related to each other? Consider the following: A parent transmits to their offspring one of the two copies they have of each gene. If one of the parents is a carrier, then the chances are 1/2 that their children will also be carriers. Given that cystic fibrosis is a relatively common genetic disease, it works out that the chances that two siblings will both be carriers of cystic fibrosis is 1/50, as compared to 1/625 for two unrelated persons. For first cousins, the risk is 1/200 and for second cousins, the risk is the same as if they were unrelated. PKU is a rarer genetic disease that if untreated, will cause severe mental retardation. The occurrence is 1/12000 live births. The chances that two unrelated people are carriers is 1/2500. For two siblings, the risk 1/100, for first cousins, it is 1/400 and for second cousins, it is 1/1600. Thus, the real risk is with brother-sister marriages, and to a lesser extent, first cousin marriages. Any relations beyond these are essentially at the same risk as the general population.
http://www.globalgraffiti.com/family/cousin.htm

you dont seem to understand the question.

it is assuming that NO CHILDREN WILL RESULT FROM SAID UNION!

thus, the issue with genetics is taken out. the only thing left is the issue of incest as a moral and social taboo.

It could happen though if a union occurred.
 

Fayd

Diamond Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,970
2
76
www.manwhoring.com
Originally posted by: ChAoTiCpInOy
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: SunSamurai
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: SunSamurai
Had a hot cousin and hell no. 2nd cousins and beyond. It sounds like alot of you are the product of such a union.

haha, so you make a clear cut? 1st cousin definitely no, 2nd cousin definitely okay?

Sorry if you think fucking almost full blooded relatives is ok. Genetically 2nd cousin and on is not a risk.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_couple
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consanguinity



But what happens if they are related to each other? Consider the following: A parent transmits to their offspring one of the two copies they have of each gene. If one of the parents is a carrier, then the chances are 1/2 that their children will also be carriers. Given that cystic fibrosis is a relatively common genetic disease, it works out that the chances that two siblings will both be carriers of cystic fibrosis is 1/50, as compared to 1/625 for two unrelated persons. For first cousins, the risk is 1/200 and for second cousins, the risk is the same as if they were unrelated. PKU is a rarer genetic disease that if untreated, will cause severe mental retardation. The occurrence is 1/12000 live births. The chances that two unrelated people are carriers is 1/2500. For two siblings, the risk 1/100, for first cousins, it is 1/400 and for second cousins, it is 1/1600. Thus, the real risk is with brother-sister marriages, and to a lesser extent, first cousin marriages. Any relations beyond these are essentially at the same risk as the general population.
http://www.globalgraffiti.com/family/cousin.htm

you dont seem to understand the question.

it is assuming that NO CHILDREN WILL RESULT FROM SAID UNION!

thus, the issue with genetics is taken out. the only thing left is the issue of incest as a moral and social taboo.

It could happen though if a union occurred.

then let's assume that if it did happen, then said hot cousin would immediately do morning after pill/abortion. or you're nailing her in such a way that no pregnancy can result.

either way, let's just ASSUME FOR PURPOSES OF SIMPLICITY, that no child will result from said union.
 

Safeway

Lifer
Jun 22, 2004
12,075
11
81
If I had a hot cousin, it'd depend on our family relationship. If I met her for the first time when she was 18 and I was 20, and she jumped my crotch, I'd probably hit it. And then again. And again.

If we grew up together, no way. That would be too awkward.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.