SunnyD
Belgian Waffler
I'd like my own zipcode too.Originally posted by: ed21x
I would like an aircraft carrier.![]()
I'd like my own zipcode too.Originally posted by: ed21x
I would like an aircraft carrier.![]()
Messierschmidt? You've got to be kidding right? Aside from being an antique and worth money, it was one of the worst aircraft of it's time. It took way too much fuel, and was utterly ineffective because it literally "flew too fast" - pilots overflew their targets too often. Also, just the maintainence of these things was horrible. 85% of them never made it off the ground because of mechanical failures.Originally posted by: Dark4ng3l
Me-262 fighter/bomber.
That'd be my vote tooOriginally posted by: Spike
just give me a M1A2 Abrams... with a full load of sabot and HEAT rounds for the main cannon and full 5.57mm loads for both machine guns. Man, that would be a ton of fun. Just think of driving that thing into a dump or demolition derby...
-spike
It's the body. The titanium alloy they use there is GREAT under stress... it just expands under the heat generated by the flight. Solution: Make the according parts of the plane with gaps in them so that when they heats up, the expansion will seal everything up. It's certainly an interesting solution.Originally posted by: TallBill
I actually just found an awesome picture of an SR-71 in all my junk here at home. My father used to work on the SR-71. Fuel would leak from the fuesalage while it was on ground.
Cant remember the reason, but when it was going super fast, the skin would tighten up or something and hold the fuel. :Q
And at least a full million rounds for itOriginally posted by: Hammer
GE minigun
Why not? Who's gonna stop ya?Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Bradley. I would say M1A2, but the damn thing's too heavy for most surface streets. Can't be tearing up the pavement, can we?
For all the taxes you would end up paying for gas... I'd say that offsets the road degradation.Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Bradley. I would say M1A2, but the damn thing's too heavy for most surface streets. Can't be tearing up the pavement, can we?
So, you're saying that 2 gallons to the mile is pretty bad gas milage?Originally posted by: Mookow
For all the taxes you would end up paying for gas... I'd say that offsets the road degradation.Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Bradley. I would say M1A2, but the damn thing's too heavy for most surface streets. Can't be tearing up the pavement, can we?
Degredation?Originally posted by: Mookow
For all the taxes you would end up paying for gas... I'd say that offsets the road degradation.Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Bradley. I would say M1A2, but the damn thing's too heavy for most surface streets. Can't be tearing up the pavement, can we?
Now that would be cool.Originally posted by: PanzerIV
If I could have one piece of military equipment I gotta go old skool here and say a German WWII Tiger tank or perhaps an ME-109 fighter plane.
Pretty much, yeah. But nothing making 1500 HP is going to get 30 MPG, with average driving. And really, per pound, the gas mileage isnt all that bad.Originally posted by: vi_edit
So, you're saying that 2 gallons to the mile is pretty bad gas milage?Originally posted by: Mookow
For all the taxes you would end up paying for gas... I'd say that offsets the road degradation.Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Bradley. I would say M1A2, but the damn thing's too heavy for most surface streets. Can't be tearing up the pavement, can we?![]()