Originally posted by: ElFenix
so what would the top 5% do, stuff it in matresses?Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
1. You are probably right on the taxes. But I think that you are wrong on the economy and jobs. Raising taxes on the top 5% while lowering it on the "bottom" 95% puts more money in more people's hands. More importantly, it puts it into the hands of people that HAVE to spend it to survive in some cases and those that WILL spend it because they really don't know how to invest and/or save.
thisOriginally posted by: JS80
If Obama fails they will blame Bush that he made it "so bad" that Obama couldn't fix it
as usual a canadian offers the best insight into the US.Originally posted by: yllus
Folks, you got a raise in your taxes when you went to war times two. You're either going to pay those taxes now, or pay even more taxes later. That tax hike was brought to you by President Bush. Now your only major decision is what level of blatant lying you'll get by the person who puts that tax hike into law in literal terms.
The top 5% can just put their funds in foreign accounts and start business in other countries. Or they can quit the rat race, and let other people who may not be as qualified compete w/ the other companies of the world. In a global environment, I want the best to lead US companies. Usually the best cost money. If the best are unwilling to sacrifice their lives because of pay and we have a 2nd rate "team", surely our economy will be hurt in the world market.
Taxes will hurt even more if we have a recession. Increasing taxes to reduce the deficit or pay social programs that maybe inefficient can cause a recession -- especially if the economy is presently just barely "chugging along"...
Instead of worrying about the deficit, we should worry about how to get a robust economy. in a robust economy, the deficit will take care of its self (or at least not be a major problem). Just my humble opinon.
