• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

If obama wins..

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
A mediocre plans beats the crap of the "no plan" that 47 million Americans have now. You do realize that that is almost 1/6 of the country, right?

Those who bitch about UHC have probably never gone a recent day without coverage. I worked for a company that went bankrupt and got laid off after 18 1/2 years on the job. The COBRA was way too expensive and it took me about 18 months to find another job where I had medical benefits again. It sucked.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: JS80
If Obama fails they will blame Bush that he made it "so bad" that Obama couldn't fix it
That's a given.

Why shouldn't the truth be a given?

Might be true if he were Emperor but most of any faults lie with Congress. In fact I would argue if he were Emperor we would be more prosperous.

I guess somebody made him sign legislation that Congress passed to him? Sorry, no buck passing.

So if Clinton signs the medicare bill he's the common man's hero but if Bush signs it he's a big government republican? :roll:
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: JS80
If Obama fails they will blame Bush that he made it "so bad" that Obama couldn't fix it
That's a given.

Why shouldn't the truth be a given?
What truth...that Obama can't fix anything because it's already too screwed up?

In a car headed towards a cliff, would you rather turn the wheel or jam the accelerator harder? Sadly, we don't have the option of brakes.
So...what are you saying...we have no hope and it doesn't matter who gets elected?

 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
I thought McCain would be OK, but now I think he's too much of a loose cannon. I really think he is going to bring more war than this country can afford.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
A mediocre plans beats the crap of the "no plan" that 47 million Americans have now. You do realize that that is almost 1/6 of the country, right?

Those who bitch about UHC have probably never gone a recent day without coverage. I worked for a company that went bankrupt and got laid off after 18 1/2 years on the job. The COBRA was way too expensive and it took me about 18 months to find another job where I had medical benefits again. It sucked.

I didn't have health insurance for the first 20 years of my life. My parents have never had health insurance their entire lives (and still don't). They are healthy and living just fine.
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
62,838
19,058
136
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: JS80
If Obama fails they will blame Bush that he made it "so bad" that Obama couldn't fix it
That's a given.

Why shouldn't the truth be a given?
What truth...that Obama can't fix anything because it's already too screwed up?

In a car headed towards a cliff, would you rather turn the wheel or jam the accelerator harder? Sadly, we don't have the option of brakes.
So...what are you saying...we have no hope and it doesn't matter who gets elected?

I'm saying turning the wheel will be more likely to get us out of trouble. No guarantees, though. No electable candidate will actually shrink the government.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: senseamp
I thought McCain would be OK, but now I think he's too much of a loose cannon. I really think he is going to bring more war than this country can afford.

Iran is a ?major threat? and it would be ?unacceptable? for the rogue nation to develop a nuclear weapon, Barack Obama said Thursday.

During his first-ever interview on FOX News? ?The O?Reilly Factor", the Democratic presidential candidate said, "It is unacceptable for Iran to possess a nuclear weapon; it would be a game changer."

Obama said he would not take military action off the table in dealing with Iran, but added that diplomacy and sanctions cannot be overlooked.

?It?s sufficient to say I would not take military action off the table and that I will never hesitate to use our military force in order to protect the homeland and the United States? interests,? he said.

Biden: Israel will be more protected with Obama
Democratic vice presidential candidate addresses Jewish pensioners near Miami, declares Jewish state's security to improve if Obama is elected president

:laugh: CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Yeah, but McCain is a loose cannon. Obama is just talking general policy. Plus with this Russian thing happening, McCain would be dangerous.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,814
10,102
136
Originally posted by: Genx87
I think rubberstamp era of the Bush admin may look tame. Or Obama could surprise us and actually be a centrist and keep the govt in check. We wont know until he is in there.

Apparently you ignored his speech. "Actually be a centrist"?... can I have what you're smoking?
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: andy04
another one to be added to the OP

Stricter environmental norms to reduce green house gases in US. More jobs lost and China producing the same thing with 10 times more pollution

Yeah, because manufacturing jobs haven't been lost to China over the last 8 years. Nice try though.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: JS80
If Obama fails they will blame Bush that he made it "so bad" that Obama couldn't fix it
That's a given.

Why shouldn't the truth be a given?
What truth...that Obama can't fix anything because it's already too screwed up?

In a car headed towards a cliff, would you rather turn the wheel or jam the accelerator harder? Sadly, we don't have the option of brakes.
So...what are you saying...we have no hope and it doesn't matter who gets elected?

I'm saying turning the wheel will be more likely to get us out of trouble. No guarantees, though. No electable candidate will actually shrink the government.
Sounds to me like a "no lose" situation for Obama...if something good happens, he gets all the credit...if something bad happens, it was all Bush's fault. Is that your story and you're sticking to it? BTW...exactly when does the statute of limitations run out for the BDSers...never?
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
Originally posted by: quest55720

Other governments might have a decent UHC not this government. There is not 1 program that is not full of bloat. If you really wish medicare level coverage for your family then I guess the Pelosi/Obama plan is what you want.

A mediocre plans beats the crap of the "no plan" that 47 million Americans have now. You do realize that that is almost 1/6 of the country, right?

Perhaps. Until it comes time to pay for it.

UHC is failing in Massachusetts, one of the heathiest, wealthiest, and whitest states in the nation.

I say we float the bill using at least part of the 650+ million dollars a day we spend in Iraq.

Except, we aren't pulling out of Iraq until 2011 and the Bush tax cuts don't expire until 2010.

I'm guessing Obamacare will pass in 2009.
 

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Question about taxes:

Bush's tax cuts end in 2010. So I guess in that sense both candidates are LOWERING taxes past 2010 when compared to status quo right? Oh and yeah I make under 250k and so does my family so according to Mr. Obama, our taxes shouldn't increase. However, increases in capital gains taxes is the biggest concern to me. Is Obama REALLY lowering taxes for 95% of Americans? Yeah, we get some more credits here and there which gives even more people the ability to not pay taxes, but for the good number of engineers like me out there, are we even benefitting? I don't know. My parents surely aren't. Do 6 figure income makers really gain anything more from Obama or from McCain? When you raise capital gains taxes, a lot of older individuals like my parents will surely suffer because of their heavy investing...

You and/or your parents probably won't be effected

Sen. Barack Obama's campaign on Thursday spelled out the details of the Democratic presidential candidate?s tax plan on his website and in an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal.

I just wanted to note the basic proposals for capital gains and dividend tax rates here:

--- Families with incomes below $250,000 would pay current capital gains rates (a maximum tax of 15% on gains on assets held more than one year). Those earning more than $250,000 would face an increase -- a top rate of 20%.

--- The top dividend tax rate would remain the current 15% for those earning less than $250,000, but would rise to 20% for those earning above that threshold.

--- For single people, the tax increases above would apply to those earning more than $200,000.

The presumptive Republican nominee, Sen. John McCain, has endorsed keeping President Bush?s current tax rates as they are.
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
62,838
19,058
136
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Originally posted by: JS80
If Obama fails they will blame Bush that he made it "so bad" that Obama couldn't fix it
That's a given.

Why shouldn't the truth be a given?
What truth...that Obama can't fix anything because it's already too screwed up?

In a car headed towards a cliff, would you rather turn the wheel or jam the accelerator harder? Sadly, we don't have the option of brakes.
So...what are you saying...we have no hope and it doesn't matter who gets elected?

I'm saying turning the wheel will be more likely to get us out of trouble. No guarantees, though. No electable candidate will actually shrink the government.
Sounds to me like a "no lose" situation for Obama...if something good happens, he gets all the credit...if something bad happens, it was all Bush's fault. Is that your story and you're sticking to it? BTW...exactly when does the statute of limitations run out for the BDSers...never?

BDSers? :confused:
 

evident

Lifer
Apr 5, 2005
12,131
749
126
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
A mediocre plans beats the crap of the "no plan" that 47 million Americans have now. You do realize that that is almost 1/6 of the country, right?

Those who bitch about UHC have probably never gone a recent day without coverage. I worked for a company that went bankrupt and got laid off after 18 1/2 years on the job. The COBRA was way too expensive and it took me about 18 months to find another job where I had medical benefits again. It sucked.

I didn't have health insurance for the first 20 years of my life. My parents have never had health insurance their entire lives (and still don't). They are healthy and living just fine.

That's great that all of you are healthy, but what if your mom or dad has a heartattack tomorrow?
What if they get shot /car accident and need medical attention?
you're gonna have to sell your house to pay for the medical bills if you don't have medical insurance. Have you seen hospital bills for services rendered?
 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: winnar111
Perhaps. Until it comes time to pay for it.

UHC is failing in Massachusetts, one of the heathiest, wealthiest, and whitest states in the nation.

I say we float the bill using at least part of the 650+ million dollars a day we spend in Iraq.

Except, we aren't pulling out of Iraq until 2011 and the Bush tax cuts don't expire until 2010.

I'm guessing Obamacare will pass in 2009.

Only time will tell. I am patient enough to wait until 2011-2012. I won't be crying a river if it comes in 2009 either.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: evident
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
A mediocre plans beats the crap of the "no plan" that 47 million Americans have now. You do realize that that is almost 1/6 of the country, right?

Those who bitch about UHC have probably never gone a recent day without coverage. I worked for a company that went bankrupt and got laid off after 18 1/2 years on the job. The COBRA was way too expensive and it took me about 18 months to find another job where I had medical benefits again. It sucked.

I didn't have health insurance for the first 20 years of my life. My parents have never had health insurance their entire lives (and still don't). They are healthy and living just fine.

That's great that all of you are healthy, but what if your mom or dad has a heartattack tomorrow?
What if they get shot /car accident and need medical attention?
you're gonna have to sell your house to pay for the medical bills if you don't have medical insurance. Have you seen hospital bills for services rendered?

They won't have heartattacks, no family history and they eat very healthy. If they get shot, then we'll pay for it out of pocket with the $1k/mo x 55 years of their life they didn't have to pay for insurance they saved.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,787
11,420
136
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: evident
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
A mediocre plans beats the crap of the "no plan" that 47 million Americans have now. You do realize that that is almost 1/6 of the country, right?

Those who bitch about UHC have probably never gone a recent day without coverage. I worked for a company that went bankrupt and got laid off after 18 1/2 years on the job. The COBRA was way too expensive and it took me about 18 months to find another job where I had medical benefits again. It sucked.

I didn't have health insurance for the first 20 years of my life. My parents have never had health insurance their entire lives (and still don't). They are healthy and living just fine.

That's great that all of you are healthy, but what if your mom or dad has a heartattack tomorrow?
What if they get shot /car accident and need medical attention?
you're gonna have to sell your house to pay for the medical bills if you don't have medical insurance. Have you seen hospital bills for services rendered?

They won't have heartattacks, no family history and they eat very healthy. If they get shot, then we'll pay for it out of pocket with the $1k/mo x 55 years of their life they didn't have to pay for insurance they saved.

Assuming it would have been $1k a month for the whole timeframe, that 660k will cover one nice bypass, or maybe a short bout with a treatable cancer. Then what?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,984
55,389
136
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: evident
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
A mediocre plans beats the crap of the "no plan" that 47 million Americans have now. You do realize that that is almost 1/6 of the country, right?

Those who bitch about UHC have probably never gone a recent day without coverage. I worked for a company that went bankrupt and got laid off after 18 1/2 years on the job. The COBRA was way too expensive and it took me about 18 months to find another job where I had medical benefits again. It sucked.

I didn't have health insurance for the first 20 years of my life. My parents have never had health insurance their entire lives (and still don't). They are healthy and living just fine.

That's great that all of you are healthy, but what if your mom or dad has a heartattack tomorrow?
What if they get shot /car accident and need medical attention?
you're gonna have to sell your house to pay for the medical bills if you don't have medical insurance. Have you seen hospital bills for services rendered?

They won't have heartattacks, no family history and they eat very healthy. If they get shot, then we'll pay for it out of pocket with the $1k/mo x 55 years of their life they didn't have to pay for insurance they saved.

This is pretty dumb thinking. First of all, health insurance wouldn't have been costing them 1k a month for the 55 years of their life. Second of all what you're saying is basically akin to "I don't need car insurance because I've never been in an accident". Real smart move there. Just don't go crying when your family is filing for bankruptcy.
 

evident

Lifer
Apr 5, 2005
12,131
749
126
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: evident
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
A mediocre plans beats the crap of the "no plan" that 47 million Americans have now. You do realize that that is almost 1/6 of the country, right?

Those who bitch about UHC have probably never gone a recent day without coverage. I worked for a company that went bankrupt and got laid off after 18 1/2 years on the job. The COBRA was way too expensive and it took me about 18 months to find another job where I had medical benefits again. It sucked.

I didn't have health insurance for the first 20 years of my life. My parents have never had health insurance their entire lives (and still don't). They are healthy and living just fine.

That's great that all of you are healthy, but what if your mom or dad has a heartattack tomorrow?
What if they get shot /car accident and need medical attention?
you're gonna have to sell your house to pay for the medical bills if you don't have medical insurance. Have you seen hospital bills for services rendered?

They won't have heartattacks, no family history and they eat very healthy. If they get shot, then we'll pay for it out of pocket with the $1k/mo x 55 years of their life they didn't have to pay for insurance they saved.


My family eats very well too. We all exercise and my parents are both in very good health. then one day my mom had a ruptured brain aneurysm and almost died. brain aneurysms can happen to anyone and almost no one regularly gets a brain cat scan to see if they have one. it took her about 3 months in the hospital for recovery, then after that we had home care for another month. Thank god now she's almost 100% again. Luckily, they had health insurance, but the total billcame from the hospital for that event came out to be around $500k. our copay was $500.

Can you explain how someone without any medical insurance who makes less money than our family would be able to pay for that?

1k a month for 55 years is roughly 650k. that would cover that event once. now what if a second event happens? you wont be able to afford that and it will come out of the hospital's "people who don't have insurance fund" and i think in some indirect way we end up paying for it

what if you need preventative screening like an MRI or a cat scan? those cost $5k alone to get done.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,984
55,389
136
Originally posted by: evident

My family eats very well too. We all exercise and my parents are both in very good health. then one day my mom had a ruptured brain aneurysm and almost died. brain aneurysms can happen to anyone and almost no one regularly gets a brain cat scan to see if they have one. it took her about 3 months in the hospital for recovery, then after that we had home care for another month. Thank god now she's almost 100% again. Luckily, they had health insurance, but the total billcame from the hospital for that event came out to be around $500k.

Can you explain how someone without any medical insurance who makes less money than our family would be able to pay for that?

The worst thing is that guess who is going to be paying for their irresponsibility after the money runs out? We will be. Funny how JS80 is always talking about personal responsibility for everyone else, but he and his family are going to end up placing the rest of us on the hook for their fucking irresponsible behavior.
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Folks, you got a raise in your taxes when you went to war times two. You're either going to pay those taxes now, or pay even more taxes later. That tax hike was brought to you by President Bush. Now your only major decision is what level of blatant lying you'll get by the person who puts that tax hike into law in literal terms.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,984
55,389
136
Originally posted by: yllus
Folks, you got a raise in your taxes when you went to war times two. You're either going to pay those taxes now, or pay even more taxes later. That tax hike was brought to you by President Bush. Now your only major decision is what level of blatant lying you'll get by the person who puts that tax hike into law in literal terms.

Yeap. We'll either pay for Bush's tax hike now, or pay for it even later with even more interest.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
1. You are probably right on the taxes. But I think that you are wrong on the economy and jobs. Raising taxes on the top 5% while lowering it on the "bottom" 95% puts more money in more people's hands. More importantly, it puts it into the hands of people that HAVE to spend it to survive in some cases and those that WILL spend it because they really don't know how to invest and/or save.
so what would the top 5% do, stuff it in matresses?


Originally posted by: JS80
If Obama fails they will blame Bush that he made it "so bad" that Obama couldn't fix it
this


Originally posted by: yllus
Folks, you got a raise in your taxes when you went to war times two. You're either going to pay those taxes now, or pay even more taxes later. That tax hike was brought to you by President Bush. Now your only major decision is what level of blatant lying you'll get by the person who puts that tax hike into law in literal terms.
as usual a canadian offers the best insight into the US.
 

CitizenKain

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2000
4,480
14
76
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: evident
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
A mediocre plans beats the crap of the "no plan" that 47 million Americans have now. You do realize that that is almost 1/6 of the country, right?

Those who bitch about UHC have probably never gone a recent day without coverage. I worked for a company that went bankrupt and got laid off after 18 1/2 years on the job. The COBRA was way too expensive and it took me about 18 months to find another job where I had medical benefits again. It sucked.

I didn't have health insurance for the first 20 years of my life. My parents have never had health insurance their entire lives (and still don't). They are healthy and living just fine.

That's great that all of you are healthy, but what if your mom or dad has a heartattack tomorrow?
What if they get shot /car accident and need medical attention?
you're gonna have to sell your house to pay for the medical bills if you don't have medical insurance. Have you seen hospital bills for services rendered?

They won't have heartattacks, no family history and they eat very healthy. If they get shot, then we'll pay for it out of pocket with the $1k/mo x 55 years of their life they didn't have to pay for insurance they saved.

I can't wait to pay for your parents health care eventually then. Thanks for being irresponsible and living off the work of others.