ICE fires first shot.

Page 21 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Dec 10, 2005
28,369
13,263
136
A protester was acquitted Wednesday of charges that he assaulted a federal agent during widespread protests against immigration crackdowns in Los Angeles, just hours after one of the faces of President Trump’s enforcement policies took the stand to testify against him.

U.S. Border Patrol Sector Chief Gregory Bovino — the brash agent who led a phalanx of military personnel into MacArthur Park this summer — was called as a witness Wednesday in a federal misdemeanor assault case against Brayan Ramos-Brito, who was accused of striking a federal agent.

Bovino, who flew in to testify from Chicago, the latest city targeted for an immigration enforcement surge, said he witnessed the alleged assault committed by Ramos-Brito in Paramount on June 7.

Bovino was questioned by the defense about previous comments he made referring to undocumented immigrants as “scum.”

The jury came back with the acquittal after a little over an hour of deliberations.

LOL - they had Bovino come and testify against this person and the jury either said "we don't believe you" or "haha, fuck you ICE".
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,340
45,755
136


LOL - they had Bovino come and testify against this person and the jury either said "we don't believe you" or "haha, fuck you ICE".

Juries all over the place giving the DOJ the finger seems like a barrier to consolidating the regime’s rule.
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,369
13,263
136

Trump appointed federal judge grants the preliminary injunction blocking the deportation of unaccompanied minors to Guatemala. And calls out the government's bullshit too in the decision.
Some further details on the opinion in this thread, but specifically:


Is it bad when judges call you out for misrepresenting and lying about the record?
 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,886
55,136
136
Some of it is probably "building the record", but some of it is that licensing organizations are extremely weak.
Most of it is the latter, including extreme reluctance among lawyers to make legal arguments sanctionable, even obviously bad faith ones like this. (I think we should be far more comfortable with sanctioning lawyers who act unethically in this way but that's just me)

Certain things will get you disbarred quite easily. Co-mingling funds with a client's? (ie: stealing from them) Disbarred pretty easily. Sleeping with your clients? Disbarred. Lying to the court in order to deport small children to a life of misery? Welllllll... what can you do.
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,369
13,263
136
Most of it is the latter, including extreme reluctance among lawyers to make legal arguments sanctionable, even obviously bad faith ones like this. (I think we should be far more comfortable with sanctioning lawyers who act unethically in this way but that's just me)
You'd probably have to fix law school journals that basically exist to let people make and launder bad faith legal arguments and encourage professors to enforce standards that bullshit arguments shouldn't be entertained for "debate purposes".
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,886
55,136
136
You'd probably have to fix law school journals that basically exist to let people make and launder bad faith legal arguments and encourage professors to enforce standards that bullshit arguments shouldn't be entertained for "debate purposes".
The legal profession has definitely spent far, far too many years smelling its own farts about the sacrosanct nature of debate.

As a society we have legally argued ourselves from a constitution based on a distrust of unfettered executive power into a situation where the president is a king who can kill with impunity, one stupid step at a time.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
25,918
12,204
136