TastesLikeChicken
Lifer
- Sep 12, 2004
- 16,852
- 59
- 86
Exactly. Those who have read the garbage from the PNAC website and believe they are qualified experts on neocons don't have a clue who they are or what they are about, and they are seemingly clueless about PNAC as well. Hint: It's a thinktank and lobbying organization for the military industry and not any grand conspiracy to own the world.Originally posted by: gallivanter
Originally posted by: conjur
Are you calling this writer a liar?Originally posted by: Crimson
Right, because everyone who disagrees with your is either stupid or sleeping. They couldn't POSSIBLY actually believe what they do based on a logical analysis of the information. More tolerance from Conjur.
I am, in a way. I don't doubt that he supported the action in Iraq and now no longer does. But if he were truly of a neoconservative philosophy, he would understand that being so is about so much more than military action in Iraq, just as being a neoliberal is about so much more than favoring paygo. Further, if he were truly a neoconservative, he would understand the larger picture regarding Iraq, that it never was about, from a neoconservative perspective, simple platitudes like freedom being on the march. Nor would he watch FoxNews or lisen to Rush.
Well, at least there's one person in this forum who has an inkling about neocons and what they are all about. The guy in that article surely isn't one, that's for damn sure.