• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

I honestly don't care for Apple Products

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Android suits me quite well on the mobile market. But I wouldn't buy an android based device on something that is supposed to last longer then 1-2 years (tablet).

There are so many manufacturers, so many devices, so little time to keep them updated. Your device may not be bricked, but you will often get left in the dust with new updates.

Apple does a good job with keeping things relatively appliance based. You buy product A and they will support that product throughout it's lifetime. Will this change? I don't know...but an Iphone 3 is probably much more serviceable then my comparable android device that I bought next to it.

When it comes to laptops/PC's...I still have a hard time giving Apple a serious look from Microsoft.
 
My favorite apple product by far:

Apple_pie.jpg
 
Your pricing isn't valid, because Amazon itself doesn't sell the iPhones. What you're talking about are third-party prices. I see people make the same mistake with Nintendo consoles as Amazon doesn't sell those either!

Ok, sure, the flagship ip6 is actually $650, Droid Turbo $600.
http://www.verizonwireless.com/smartphones/iphone-6/
http://www.verizonwireless.com/smartphones/droid-turbo-ballistic-nylon/

These prices matter, especially to Verizon users, because their monthly payment is contingent upon paying off the entirety of the retail price with the Edge plan. I'm paying 8% less per month and getting 2X the battery life of the iphone 6 and wireless charging. Overall, the iphone 6 gets shit on by the Droid Turbo, $ for $. If you want to bridge the battery gap, then you're going to have to fork out $750 for the 6+, or 25% more than the Droid Turbo. Have fun with that. Read the link I posted above.
Conclusion

The Motorola Droid Turbo is one of the most powerful Android devices ever made, ready to overlook elegance in favor of raw silicon power, and the latest specs. In this, it reminds us in many ways of computers dedicated to gaming, down to their masculine looks - the Droid Turbo is like a little armored soldier, with its Kevlar back and durable materials. We’re happy to see the Droid Turbo is a little spec madness: with top performance, and a Quad HD 5.2” display, all subject of geek wet dreams. The Droid Turbo is close to being the perfect phone for that geek audience, and in this line of thought, it’s a pity that the phone only arrives on Verizon Wireless.

The iPhone 6 features even more powerful silicon (although it might appear shy on specs), but looking feature by feature it falls short in some notable areas: while the Droid Turbo has a super sharp Quad HD display, the iPhone 6 features a smaller screen with far lower resolution, although it is more accurate. And while Motorola is not afraid to pack in the largest battery possible in the 5.2” Droid Turbo, Apple uses a small battery pack with mediocre battery life, which is the monumental difference between the two: the Droid Turbo lasts twice as much as the iPhone 6. Both come at the same $200 on-contract price, so which is better? We will leave the decision up to you, as the iPhone 6's svelte looks will appeal more than specs to some, while hardware geeks might prefer the Droid Turbo.
 
I'd love to own a MacBook Air, but the screen res isn't high enough for the amount of money I'd be shelling out.

I own an Air. Not sure there's much to complain about the resolution at 1440x900. Now quality...that I can understand. It's a bit washed out and the colors aren't as good as on a Pro. But that lower end screen also helps the Air pull upwards of 13 hours of battery life too.
 
I own one Apple device, an IPad mini first generation. It's not perfect but I like it. I find it more difficult to use than the windows or android devices.
However it's a solid and reliable device.
 
I own an Air. Not sure there's much to complain about the resolution at 1440x900. Now quality...that I can understand. It's a bit washed out and the colors aren't as good as on a Pro. But that lower end screen also helps the Air pull upwards of 13 hours of battery life too.

I'd sacrifice 3 of those hours for 1680x1050 or :shudder: 1920x1080

I've suffered through enough shitty resolution laptops, my next one is going to have more than 1000 vertical pixels or I'm not buying.
 
These prices matter, especially to Verizon users, because their monthly payment is contingent upon paying off the entirety of the retail price with the Edge plan. I'm paying 8% less per month and getting 2X the battery life of the iphone 6 and wireless charging. Overall, the iphone 6 gets shit on by the Droid Turbo, $ for $. If you want to bridge the battery gap, then you're going to have to fork out $750 for the 6+, or 25% more than the Droid Turbo. Have fun with that. Read the link I posted above.

What if I find the iPhone 6's battery life sufficient for my daily usage? What if I don't consider wireless charging to be a "necessary feature" on my smartphone? Does the iPhone 6 still get "shit on" by the Droid Turbo at that point? I don't see what this article is supposed to suggest to me as well. It just seems to push the same battery life as some necessity.
 
Windows 8 is the same if not better it just has a different user interface that people would not do the research TOC learn. They even added a start button for you. What else is wrong with it?a

I'm a Microsoft Certified Professional and I hate Windows 8. They made everything so damned inefficient to get to. It was partially fixed with 8.1, but still not as streamlined as 7 was.
 
No user replaceable batteries 😡

Apple products are meh... but the competition is often worse, sometimes I just want to find the person who thought up dell/HP/anyothercompany's lineups and beat them around the head with a macbook. Apple does a lot of things right, their minimal product lineup with reasonable names is something a lot of companies could learn from, just look at this:

http://store.hp.com/UKStore/Merch/List.aspx?sel=PCNB
HP ENVY TouchSmart 15-j134na
HP Omen 15-5001na Laptop

VS

http://store.apple.com/uk/mac
Macbook Pro
Macbook Air

No fucking wonder my mum wants an apple laptop 🙄 If apple came out with a £399/499 laptop, low specs but retaining the quality it would tear into the sales of these other companies. Likely tear into apples own sales as well though.

Much like Porsche, an affordable Macbook is a used Macbook 😀
 
I have a $980 (usd) 27" Apple computer monitor called the Apple Cinema Display (not the Thunderbolt one.) I don't use it much anymore because I found a 27" Samsung monitor with a better picture imo.

But I'm keeping the Apple monitor because of status. I think it would impress Apple type people if they knew I had at least one major high end Apple equipment product. I'm in graphic design and use Intel powered PCs for it. But if any of those Apple aficionados wind up being my client or supervisor them it would help to keep the Apple monitor to show I'm at least partly pro Apple. So it's for business and not the picture. The Samsung blows it away for picture quality.

Edit: btw the Apple monitor functions with the Intel powered PCs, you just need a DP (Display Port) on your hd video card.
 
Last edited:
Bought an Ipad Mini 2 Retina last year for Christmas for $400. 16GB is a joke.

Bought a Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4 this year for Christmas for $200 and it has expandable memory too. The Ipad Mini 2 Retina is still going for $300 today. F U Apple.

The only thing I can give them credit for is the superior battery life. I absolutely DESPISE them for not having a back button. It annoys me to no end.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top