• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

i hate the term 'gas guzzling V8'

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: RyanSengara
Originally posted by: Mrvile
Originally posted by: ElFenix
seriously, the configuration of the cylinders doesn't have that much to do with mileage. even displacement isn't going to have that much of a difference (except for the increase in weight and internal friction). no, weight, gearing, and aerodynamics are the most important factors. of course, that is just the ramblings of a layperson.

Right, I'll keep that in mind when my v8 smokes your 4cyl inline Civic POS.

He's an advocate for your V8 pieces of sh!t, and there aren't that many left so I SUGGEST that you stop pissing him off and piss off the very few you have left.

Do tell me what makes the V8 a piece of shit? Weight? Ever hear of the LS1? Economy? EFI baby... Power, oh wait... has plenty of that... What was it again that makes it a piece of crap?

 
I'll tell ya what... if someone can show me a V-8 that gets over 35 miles a gallon AND makes over 100 horsepower, I'll stop using that term completely 🙂
 
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
I'll tell ya what... if someone can show me a V-8 that gets over 35 miles a gallon AND makes over 100 horsepower, I'll stop using that term completely 🙂

Now if somebody showed me how to get your head out of your ass, I stop using the term..your a fcktard
 
Originally posted by: Stumps
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
I'll tell ya what... if someone can show me a V-8 that gets over 35 miles a gallon AND makes over 100 horsepower, I'll stop using that term completely 🙂

Now if somebody showed me how to get your head out of your ass, I stop using the term..your a fcktard

Umm... yeah. Nice piece of insight there. What the hell... Are you trying to get another mod quote or something?
 
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
Originally posted by: Stumps
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
I'll tell ya what... if someone can show me a V-8 that gets over 35 miles a gallon AND makes over 100 horsepower, I'll stop using that term completely 🙂

Now if somebody showed me how to get your head out of your ass, I stop using the term..your a fcktard

Umm... yeah. Nice piece of insight there. What the hell... Are you trying to get another mod quote or something?

I think he was just trying to let us all know that you're a fvcktard. Thanks for the heads up Stumps. :thumbsup:
 
yeah but they are.

the more cylinders, the worse gas mileage. thats not technically correct, but when you look at actual cars on the road, its never wrong. on the same model car, the extra cylinders make for worse mileage.
 
Originally posted by: smc13
V-8's are gas guzzling. Find a v-8 that gets the fuel economy of a 4 banger.

the dodge magnum gets very similar gas milage to a mitsu Evo8 MR (US spec, so the FQ's would get worse MPG), and the subie WRX-Sti
 
Originally posted by: FrustratedUser
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: FrustratedUser
I'll be right back. Just need to install the 750cui V16 in the Prius since it really doesn't matter anyway.

i think that engine would crush the prius. probably about as long as one too.

I'm back.
It didn't fit as you said so I mounted the wheels on the engine itself. Slapped on a seat on top of the transmission and then I'm using rope to steer.


Got a good laugh from that one :laugh:
 
Originally posted by: smc13
V-8's are gas guzzling. Find a v-8 that gets the fuel economy of a 4 banger.

There are plenty of V8s out there that get 25-30 MPG. Granted, not quite as good as a modern 4 cyl. However, I dare you to find me a 4 banger that provides the HP and torque of a modern V8 - let alone, one that does so while providing better gas mileage.

It's all in where your preferences lie. You want fuel mileage above all else, get a 4 cyl. You want some grunt / power, while still retaining acceptable mileage, get a V8.
 
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
Originally posted by: Stumps
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
I'll tell ya what... if someone can show me a V-8 that gets over 35 miles a gallon AND makes over 100 horsepower, I'll stop using that term completely 🙂

Now if somebody showed me how to get your head out of your ass, I stop using the term..your a fcktard

Umm... yeah. Nice piece of insight there. What the hell... Are you trying to get another mod quote or something?

I think he was just trying to let us all know that you're a fvcktard. Thanks for the heads up Stumps. :thumbsup:

Just doing my job..and for the record GMH(Holden) has a V8 that will give 40mpg under certain conditions.
back in the late 60's Ford was doing really well in passanger car market in Australia, thanks to it's 4.1litre (250cu) inline 6 which offered V8 like performance with six cylinder fuel economy, all GMH had to offer was a 3litre (186cu) inline 6 that was too small for the cars it was fitted to, Mainly the Kingswood although in the torana the 186S worked well.
to offer competition to the 4.1litre, GMH took it's 5 litre (308CU) V8 and change the bore by using the smaller pistons of the 186 to create the 4.2litre(253cu) V8.
Now this little V8 was a high revving screamer, but it lacked the torque compared to the big ford six, but because it was fitted with a 2bbl Stromberg Carb it generally gave better economy than the 186S engine and the 250 ford six.
to this day the economy of that little V8 was the only real reason that is was prefered over the 3litre and later 3.3litre six used in GMH cars up till 1984 when it was phased out for a EFI Nissan 3 litre.
Holden's figures are a bit dodgy for this engine but in 2bbl form it offered abot 100kw's and gave better than 40mpg when fitted with a 4spd M21 and 2.78 in a 1200kg 1979 VB commordore, i should know plenty of my friends have owned cars with the 253 fitted to them, they are generally crap compared to the ford inline six but still they are a V8 and the do offer excellent economy.
Although they are often refer to as a 202cu six with a pair of extra pistons chucked in for extra weight,
some later 253 found in the VC and VH commodore where fitted with a 4bbl Rochester carb and EST Ignition and I have been told they give better economy than the earlier 2bbl 253
 
Methinks it's absurd that people that weigh 200 pounds (and in many cases less) use a 4000+ pound vehicle to transport themselves around. Ridiculous!
 
My 4-cylinder gets 15 city during a bad week of traffic and about 17 hwy.

Good week i'll get 17 city/20 hwy

lol


GUZZZLEEE
 
It is mostly about displacement.

14 particles of air for 1 particle of gas.

More displacement = More air = more gas

Gearing is also a big factor....
 
Originally posted by: Black88GTA
Originally posted by: smc13
V-8's are gas guzzling. Find a v-8 that gets the fuel economy of a 4 banger.

There are plenty of V8s out there that get 25-30 MPG. Granted, not quite as good as a modern 4 cyl. However, I dare you to find me a 4 banger that provides the HP and torque of a modern V8 - let alone, one that does so while providing better gas mileage.

It's all in where your preferences lie. You want fuel mileage above all else, get a 4 cyl. You want some grunt / power, while still retaining acceptable mileage, get a V8.


Which one? Show me a V-8 that gets 30 MPG.
 
Originally posted by: smc13
Originally posted by: Black88GTA
Originally posted by: smc13
V-8's are gas guzzling. Find a v-8 that gets the fuel economy of a 4 banger.

There are plenty of V8s out there that get 25-30 MPG. Granted, not quite as good as a modern 4 cyl. However, I dare you to find me a 4 banger that provides the HP and torque of a modern V8 - let alone, one that does so while providing better gas mileage.

It's all in where your preferences lie. You want fuel mileage above all else, get a 4 cyl. You want some grunt / power, while still retaining acceptable mileage, get a V8.


Which one? Show me a V-8 that gets 30 MPG.


Chevy Corvette, gets nearly 30mpg hwy.

 
there are some ignorant retards in this thread...thats for sure. people hear V8 and automatically assume gas guzzler. its pathetic.
 
Although in the defence of 4 bangers(I still hate them but..)one of my friends had a 1978 Datsun 200B sedan which ran a LJ20 2litre and a 4speed box with a 2.6 diff. we once did a trip to sydney on $13.50 worth of fuel.
the total distance travelled was about 900km if you included all the driving we did around sydney..mainly to find strip clubs, but we never even bothered to once put fuel in the whole trip and when we got home the following day we had used exactly $13.50 worth of fuel...thats pretty damn good..that little datto kicked butt and what makes it even cooler is that we didn't drive sedatly either..we where trying to drag race everything in site😀
 
it's a term used by pu$$y little losers who drive 1.3litre Barinas and pretend they care about the environment to impress their silly stuck-up biatches.

Man card revoked for any pu$$y who uses the term.

 
Back
Top