Rakehellion
Lifer
- Jan 15, 2013
- 12,181
- 35
- 91
At 5x the price it better damn well be.
20x the selection. I'll go to fucking Wal-Mart if I want to buy store brand.
At 5x the price it better damn well be.
20x the selection. I'll go to fucking Wal-Mart if I want to buy store brand.
TJ's and Whole Foods are not mutually exclusive.
So I'm going to make two trips after standing in line at Trader Joe's for half an hour? I thought the whole point was to get everything you need at one store.
20x the selection. I'll go to fucking Wal-Mart if I want to buy store brand.
Trader Joe's is not cheap as Walmart but is definitely cheap. Quality and bang for buck ratio is extremely high. Combine that with awesome customer service and promise of no products from China and there's no store that can compare to Trader Joe's.
Trader Joe's is shit. They put on this phony "natural" hipster persona when their food is the same an anyone else's, cram people into tiny spaces so the line stretches around the store, and all of their shit is store brand so you can kiss any chance of selection goodbye. Whole Foods is much better.
I have to wonder if any of those who opposed TJ's happen to own stores in that area which sell items at high prices, exploiting those who can't travel to other, more affordable stores.
20x the selection. I'll go to fucking Wal-Mart if I want to buy store brand.
TJs and WFs carry some of the same products, like bacon. Same bacon that costs $10 at WF is $5 at TJ.
WF has longer lines at the cash register than TJ based on my experience.
That cat is set in his ways. It is pointless to argue with him.
Frankly, I suspect a troll who is 20 or younger, but whatever.
Prefers Walmart, mirrors that aren't full-length, and well-done steaks.
Let that help you make your future decisions.
I haven't even stepped foot in a Trader Joe's and I can be pretty sure I'd prefer one over a Walmart.
I fail to see the logic that potentially increased property values would contribute to low-income (i.e. subsidized) housing becoming unaffordable for the minority residents living in that neighborhood. Might cost the government more, but if affluent people are spending more money there, I would think the extra tax base would make up for the money gap.
If we give blacks access to jobs and quality food who knows what will happen^_^
I was waiting to see who would post the first racist post.
esquared
Anandtech Forum Director
That part of Portland is fucking expensive now. When I was a kid I was almost jumped many times hoping around there. Now it's this "Art District" full of shitty cologned, fedora wearing fucks on fixed speed bicycles.
It's also New Seasons (local store founded by Trader Joe's former ownership group) who is actually blocking this. They've put up 3 stores in that area over the past few years and are building more.
Trader Joe's is shit. They put on this phony "natural" hipster persona when their food is the same an anyone else's, cram people into tiny spaces so the line stretches around the store, and all of their shit is store brand so you can kiss any chance of selection goodbye. Whole Foods is much better.
I thought the point was spending as little money as possible for quality products.
It sounds like resisting gentrification is more or less the same thing as keeping your neighborhood shitty. The only way I could imagine them not wanting their property value to go up is if they mostly don't own the property. Otherwise the whole concept doesn't seem to make much sense to me.
fwiw, these 2 are the EXACT same product, from the same production line. guess which is at least 50% more expensive...