I AM LEGEND

Page 10 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
I just saw this last night. I had no expectations so for me it was entertaining.

Among the many plot holes (who cares, it's a fricken zombie movie -like they're for real) the one not mentioned is if he knocked himself and hung upside down in that booby trap, he probrably would've been dead.

Religious stuff? I hardly noticed any.

Product placement didn't bother me at all. I hardly noticed, except the GT 500 looked good.

Fern
 
Oct 4, 2004
10,515
6
81
I just saw this movie last night. First of all, I give it a lot of points for great atmosphere. All the outdoor sequences were splendidly done. The sound design was excellent, Smith really got into his character and OMG I LOVED THE DOG.

I looked up the alternate ending and quite frankly, didn't like it much. Too Hollywood and was somewhat reminiscent of the Mama T-Rex from The Lost World, wreaking havoc to reclaim her baby. It also didn't help that the Dark Seekers sounded like something from the Jurassic Park movies.

In the theatrical ending, I initially couldn't figure out why Neville had to sacrifice himself. Trying to justify it, I figured that he had spent the past three years trying to come up with a cure. He had already lost his wife and kid and now, his only companion (Sam) too. I just think the dude lost his will (err) to live. He finally got what he had worked for all along (the cure) and was probably sick of the whole fight-hunt-forage-capture-research-rinse-repeat way of life. I think he just wanted 'out' of the system. So he handed the cure to the woman and decided to put himself out of his misery. He was pretty certain that there was no 'survivor's colony' and even if there was, it only meant spending the rest of his life doing what he had been doing all along (fight-hunt-forage-capture-research-rinse-repeat).

I haven't read the book so I won't comment on the 'faithfulness' of the adaptation. But the movie certainly had its fair share of heart-pounding (and also one heartbreaking) moments. I still don't know how the woman was able to save Will but I'm going to guess she was a tough cookie to have survived (and protected a child) for three years - maybe she had been a badass (like Anna Lucia Cortez in Lost) and the movie just doesn't show us what she had been up to for the past three years.

I still prefer the theatrical ending, even though that grenade seemed unreal.
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
62,897
19,130
136
I thought the theatrical ending felt too rushed. Haven't watched the other one, and it doesn't sound like I'll bother any time soon.
 
Oct 4, 2004
10,515
6
81
Yeah, I thought the movie deserved a longer runtime. 90-minutes was somewhat on the short side. Maybe an extra 15 minutes (and some commentary on the Dark Seekers' evolution) would have helped.

I believe there is a deleted scene where the kid says, "They are evolving" which clears up the confusion I initially had over the snare trap that Smith falls for. Initially, I thought Smith had set it up himself and later forgotten about it (got delusional, paranoid and a little funny in the head).

Ed: nakedfrog, the theatrical ending can be found easily on Youtube. I thought it was worse than the original but nowhere as bad as the ones from, say, Terminator 2: Judgment Day or Titanic (I think the scene's called Brock's Epiphany and it is one of the most unintentionally funny thing I have ever seen. Bill Paxton delivers the unintentional LULZ. Also on Youtube.)
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,326
12,910
136
so with the alternate ending... what made it so "controversial"? (as listed on the special edition box). i just watched it the other night.

overall, pretty good movie. i was expecting the zombies to pop up everywhere, but they didn't. atmosphere was solid. a shame that sam died :(
 
Oct 4, 2004
10,515
6
81
so with the alternate ending... what made it so "controversial"? (as listed on the special edition box). i just watched it the other night.

I guess test audiences didn't like the 'riding off into the sunset, happily ever after' and the humanization of the Dark Seekers? Plus, it had too much of a 'wait for the sequel' vibe.
 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
so with the alternate ending... what made it so "controversial"? (as listed on the special edition box). i just watched it the other night.

overall, pretty good movie. i was expecting the zombies to pop up everywhere, but they didn't. atmosphere was solid. a shame that sam died :(

!? SPOILER ALERT ?!

I think what was considered controversial (and probably only by the producers), was the fact that it was revealed these 'zombies' actually had a capacity to both learn, and to have emotions, which led to perceivably strange behavior. The alpha male zombie had a lover, and was merely fighting to get that lover back. They also seemed to have a capacity to communicate, albeit by merely grunting and screaming. The camera then panned to a list of all the human test subjects, which kind of linked these zombies to being truly human, and they were used as experiments.

Oh, and I too was saddened by Sam's death. Not only was it a dog, but it was his only companion and link to a previously happier life.

+