Originally posted by: Macattak1
Greetings,
And I did read more on Sam Harris.
Here is the Wiki on Sam. That the Humanists have problems with his writings should say much to athiests.
Likens religion to Mental Illness
Is somehow only able to look at the bad things done in the name of Christianity, as if he is not smart enough to know that Christ does not saction the Inquisition.
Clearly sees only Embrianic Stem Cell research as valuable Though only none embrianic stem cells have prooven to be of any value or created treatments while Embrianic stem cells treatments are 20+ years off at best.
Mysticism is Rational but Religion/Christianity is not.
Faith is the devels masterpiece
And in the quoted by Luth Sam cites a statistic with no reference.
Can not find a simple prophecy that has been fullfilled.
Instead he just quotes one he does not understand well or at all.
Then he thinks that if there were a god that he must write about math, science, cures, electricity, DNA, etc.
I am sorry Luth, but Sam is not a rational, balanced, objective writer at all.
"...Harris later described Flynn's review as "mixed, misleading, and ultimately exasperating"
"...Another review by David Boulton for New Humanist, also stopped short of a ringing endorsement, describing the book as containing "startling oversimplifications, exaggerations and elisions."
So there you go. When the Humanists think your way off base and you are someone that believes only in self and refuses a spiritual side you know you have problems.
Peace and Blessings