Originally posted by: ThePresence
Well, then we're back to square one. Jesus said that "no one comes to the Father but by me" which would seem to exclude those who haven't heard of him.Originally posted by: FoBoT
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I don't understand this.Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Didn't Jesus say that no one comes to the Father but by me? If so, why would that not exclude those who never heard of him?Originally posted by: RichardEAlso, each individual will have to deal with God is his own way. I cannot say that the individual in the jungle of Asia who has never heard of Jesus is going to hell. I do know that if you know about Jesus and reject his teachings that it has been said you will be thrown into hell. Even this is still a debate among Christian circles. (I might even have some of it wrong sorry.)
Every person ever born will have the opportunity to hear and accept the Gospel of Jesus Christ, either during this life or the next. That covers all people, even those in the jungle of Asia.
The facts can easily show that there are people who have lived and died without ever hearing of Jesus or his teachings. If you say they will hear in the next life, don't you already need to be saved to experience that?
no, some christians believe ALL will be resurrected and those that never heard of J.C. on Earth will have the chance after they are resurrected. but they still have freedom of choice, nobody is forced to accept J.C. now or later or ever. if a hindu gets resurrected and still wants to stay hindu , that is freedom of choice, now and through eternity
as i stated in my other post, not ALL christians believe "non-saved" people go to hell and are SOL because they were born in a time/place where they can't learn of J.C.
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: BudAshes
If you believe in Christianity or any other faith based religion you shouldn't ever be able to use the word logic. Logic is against your religion.
That's funny. Tell me the non-Creationism theory about how the universe was formed again? With a straight face please.
Originally posted by: BudAshes
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: BudAshes
If you believe in Christianity or any other faith based religion you shouldn't ever be able to use the word logic. Logic is against your religion.
That's funny. Tell me the non-Creationism theory about how the universe was formed again? With a straight face please.
How the fvck should i know how we were were made? If i claimed to know id be taking it on faith and then I'd be no different than these religious folk. We can make guesses but there are things like dark matter and dark energy that are beyond current explanation. Maybe we will never be smart enough to completely understand our environment, or maybe when we do we will be like gods ourselves. But as soon as you start using words like faith, you throw logic out the window. By accepting creationism you are accepting an easy truth. It's a compromise you have made with yourself and you don't even realize it.
Originally posted by: FireChicken
One of my biggest problems with christianity is that you believe that even genuinely good people will go to hell just for that fact that they do not believe god or worship jesus. Is that not a judgement in its self??
I am thoroughly confused now.Originally posted by: Macattak1
Greetings,Originally posted by: ThePresence
Well, then we're back to square one. Jesus said that "no one comes to the Father but by me" which would seem to exclude those who haven't heard of him.Originally posted by: FoBoT
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I don't understand this.Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Didn't Jesus say that no one comes to the Father but by me? If so, why would that not exclude those who never heard of him?Originally posted by: RichardEAlso, each individual will have to deal with God is his own way. I cannot say that the individual in the jungle of Asia who has never heard of Jesus is going to hell. I do know that if you know about Jesus and reject his teachings that it has been said you will be thrown into hell. Even this is still a debate among Christian circles. (I might even have some of it wrong sorry.)
Every person ever born will have the opportunity to hear and accept the Gospel of Jesus Christ, either during this life or the next. That covers all people, even those in the jungle of Asia.
The facts can easily show that there are people who have lived and died without ever hearing of Jesus or his teachings. If you say they will hear in the next life, don't you already need to be saved to experience that?
no, some christians believe ALL will be resurrected and those that never heard of J.C. on Earth will have the chance after they are resurrected. but they still have freedom of choice, nobody is forced to accept J.C. now or later or ever. if a hindu gets resurrected and still wants to stay hindu , that is freedom of choice, now and through eternity
as i stated in my other post, not ALL christians believe "non-saved" people go to hell and are SOL because they were born in a time/place where they can't learn of J.C.
There is not one person that has not known of God. Jesus was before the foundations of the world. He is God, so he has always been there. Man kind has always worshiped something bigger than it simply because they have known through the ages that there has got to be something greater than themselves. But, wether they are capable of believing in a God that has complete and total perfect rightious authority is another question. Few people want to submit to that complete of an authority.
The bible does not teach that after we physically die we are given another chance. The bible teaches that once physically dead that is the end. Heaven or judgement and hell/separation from God.
Even those that died BC are able to come to God through Jesus simply because He is the Great I Am and always was, is, will be.
Peace and Blessings
Originally posted by: Garth
Ohhhhh you're a Mormon. I dare say you have larger problems, then.
From just a quick googling there seems to be some definite differences of opinion with regard to your interpretation of those verses.
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Then what is the point of living? What is the point of accepting Jesus on earth? If everyone hears his teachings in the afterlife, and if they accept at that point they are saved, then it seems to me that life is a waste of time.
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I am thoroughly confused now.Originally posted by: Macattak1
Greetings,Originally posted by: ThePresence
Well, then we're back to square one. Jesus said that "no one comes to the Father but by me" which would seem to exclude those who haven't heard of him.Originally posted by: FoBoT
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I don't understand this.Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Didn't Jesus say that no one comes to the Father but by me? If so, why would that not exclude those who never heard of him?Originally posted by: RichardEAlso, each individual will have to deal with God is his own way. I cannot say that the individual in the jungle of Asia who has never heard of Jesus is going to hell. I do know that if you know about Jesus and reject his teachings that it has been said you will be thrown into hell. Even this is still a debate among Christian circles. (I might even have some of it wrong sorry.)
Every person ever born will have the opportunity to hear and accept the Gospel of Jesus Christ, either during this life or the next. That covers all people, even those in the jungle of Asia.
The facts can easily show that there are people who have lived and died without ever hearing of Jesus or his teachings. If you say they will hear in the next life, don't you already need to be saved to experience that?
no, some christians believe ALL will be resurrected and those that never heard of J.C. on Earth will have the chance after they are resurrected. but they still have freedom of choice, nobody is forced to accept J.C. now or later or ever. if a hindu gets resurrected and still wants to stay hindu , that is freedom of choice, now and through eternity
as i stated in my other post, not ALL christians believe "non-saved" people go to hell and are SOL because they were born in a time/place where they can't learn of J.C.
There is not one person that has not known of God. Jesus was before the foundations of the world. He is God, so he has always been there. Man kind has always worshiped something bigger than it simply because they have known through the ages that there has got to be something greater than themselves. But, wether they are capable of believing in a God that has complete and total perfect rightious authority is another question. Few people want to submit to that complete of an authority.
The bible does not teach that after we physically die we are given another chance. The bible teaches that once physically dead that is the end. Heaven or judgement and hell/separation from God.
Even those that died BC are able to come to God through Jesus simply because He is the Great I Am and always was, is, will be.
Peace and Blessings
Do mean that anyone who worshipped any kind of god throughout the ages is considered saved?
Well then we're back to the original question.Originally posted by: Macattak1
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I am thoroughly confused now.Originally posted by: Macattak1
Greetings,Originally posted by: ThePresence
Well, then we're back to square one. Jesus said that "no one comes to the Father but by me" which would seem to exclude those who haven't heard of him.Originally posted by: FoBoT
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I don't understand this.Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Didn't Jesus say that no one comes to the Father but by me? If so, why would that not exclude those who never heard of him?Originally posted by: RichardEAlso, each individual will have to deal with God is his own way. I cannot say that the individual in the jungle of Asia who has never heard of Jesus is going to hell. I do know that if you know about Jesus and reject his teachings that it has been said you will be thrown into hell. Even this is still a debate among Christian circles. (I might even have some of it wrong sorry.)
Every person ever born will have the opportunity to hear and accept the Gospel of Jesus Christ, either during this life or the next. That covers all people, even those in the jungle of Asia.
The facts can easily show that there are people who have lived and died without ever hearing of Jesus or his teachings. If you say they will hear in the next life, don't you already need to be saved to experience that?
no, some christians believe ALL will be resurrected and those that never heard of J.C. on Earth will have the chance after they are resurrected. but they still have freedom of choice, nobody is forced to accept J.C. now or later or ever. if a hindu gets resurrected and still wants to stay hindu , that is freedom of choice, now and through eternity
as i stated in my other post, not ALL christians believe "non-saved" people go to hell and are SOL because they were born in a time/place where they can't learn of J.C.
There is not one person that has not known of God. Jesus was before the foundations of the world. He is God, so he has always been there. Man kind has always worshiped something bigger than it simply because they have known through the ages that there has got to be something greater than themselves. But, wether they are capable of believing in a God that has complete and total perfect rightious authority is another question. Few people want to submit to that complete of an authority.
The bible does not teach that after we physically die we are given another chance. The bible teaches that once physically dead that is the end. Heaven or judgement and hell/separation from God.
Even those that died BC are able to come to God through Jesus simply because He is the Great I Am and always was, is, will be.
Peace and Blessings
Do mean that anyone who worshipped any kind of god throughout the ages is considered saved?
Greetings,
Ah, sorry if I was not clear enough.![]()
No would be the answer. Requirements are the OT and NT god.
Peace and Blessings. (out to dinner and movie)
Originally posted by: ricochet
HotChic, you're the type of Christian that I admire. You promote tolerance and love instead of convicting heathens with fire and brimstone. It just goes to show you that not all Christians are alike. That is a sharp contrast to the self-righteous busmaster11. His type always makes me cringe and shake my head. Maybe the fact that I been around enough good behaving Christians, that I developed certain expectations about them.
At one time I hung out with quite a few Christians. My college roommate was a Bible Study leader. He would conduct a Bible Study every Tuesday in our dorm room (he got my approval ahead of time, of course). Quite honestly, he is one of the best people I've ever met in my life. He was well disciplined, smart, honest, sincere, and caring to others. Since he was a good-looking guy he also attracted a lot of girls but did not take advantage of any of them. As a true devout he believed no sex until marriage even though he's surrounded by college horndogs whose mantra is to get drunk and laid as much as possible. Whenever we watched a rated R movie he would fast forward through the gratuitious sex scenes. He has this natural high about life (akin to Ned Flanders), always seem happy, and would play Jesus songs on his guitar during weekend mornings. He maintained excellent grades in class, graduated with a Chemical Engineering degree, and went on to Med school.
This roommate of mine was one of the reason why I got interested in Christianity. I joined his Bible Study as the resident agnostic. We had fun going camping, fishing, hiking, and going on road trips. These people actually knew how to have fun without resorting to binge drinking or playing video games all day unlike my other collegues.
Alas, I could not abandon my agnostic view. Despite all those Bible lessons and encouragement I was still not convinced about Jesus. I wanted to believe as badly as anyone could. The simple fact is I DO NOT choose what I believe. My belief is unfortunately not governed by my desires. I went through a lot of self edification to come to terms with myself. I did come out of the whole experience with much respect for some of the Christians I met. Although they believed differently, they are just as entitled to it as I to mine.
I noticed that most of the ATOT topics concerning Christians lead to a lot of Christian bashing. It's refreshing to see a thread that hasn't deteriate to such debacle. Of course, I don't condone any of the behavior of Christians that typically make the news. But to apply such stereotypical behaviors to all Christians is just ignorant. I just wish the ATOT community would not be so bitter about Christians.
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: Luthien
Originally posted by: busmaster11
Originally posted by: Luthien
You know why christians "hate" atheists and any other belief so much? Because they threaten christianity's very nature. While in the midst of belief a christian cannot reconcile the self inflicted threat of hell and loss of a magical heaven. Failure to believe in a believers mind means they must give up heaven and suffer hell. The enduring threats they got suckered into believing has traped them. It will continue to trap them until they stop believing in heaven and hell but that means they are going to hell... I think you get the irony of this mind trap that religions love to use because it is so powerful; on top of that they will lose the social bonds that were created within the church and amongst fellow believers so moving on is a very scary thing. It is all no different than any cult. Christianity is a macrocosmic cult just like every other major world religion. The very threat that converted them traps them.
You're thinking from a strictly psychoanalytical perspective. Since you believe that hell is nothing more than a "self-inflicted threat" you clearly don't believe in God. So reasoning with you, again, is impossible, because the Lord has given the humble and the repentent a superior perspective through His Word.
God's perspective. We can get into the hundreds of pieces of scientific and archaeological evidence which points to a Creator (or Jesus specifically) but I don't believe it will do us any good. It did not do me any good...
Believers can only argue based on the premise that we rely on God's Word - and since you deny it, we'll just have to disagree and call it a day.
Yeah, I know your chosen and the rest of us are consigned to hell. Been there done that ad nauseam.
So, does all this scientific evidence prove the bible is litteral because if so I gotta hear these proofs.
i'm a christian, have been all my life, don't believe in the "hell" that is commonly concieved, to me, separation from God IS hell. and i don't believe in an eternal fire either.
as to hating non christians, nope, i don't hate non christians any more or less than i hate christians. i don't base my hatred of people simply on something generic as their belief system but based on my interactions with individual people. and christ discourages hatred.
your mocking tone is annoying though, we can have an intelligent conversation without the mocking.
it seems to me that many non christians / athiest are just as evangelical and full of hatred for christians as you claim christians feel for non believers. and it could be argued that this hatred stems from the same reason you claims christians hate, due to their own insecurities.
Originally posted by: busmaster11
Originally posted by: BudAshes
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: BudAshes
If you believe in Christianity or any other faith based religion you shouldn't ever be able to use the word logic. Logic is against your religion.
That's funny. Tell me the non-Creationism theory about how the universe was formed again? With a straight face please.
How the fvck should i know how we were were made? If i claimed to know id be taking it on faith and then I'd be no different than these religious folk. We can make guesses but there are things like dark matter and dark energy that are beyond current explanation. Maybe we will never be smart enough to completely understand our environment, or maybe when we do we will be like gods ourselves. But as soon as you start using words like faith, you throw logic out the window. By accepting creationism you are accepting an easy truth. It's a compromise you have made with yourself and you don't even realize it.
No. By throwing around words like dark matter and dark energy as if the volumes proving those can even come near to the volumes written on God by Godly men and women, you're relying on more faith than a Christian ever could.
Creationism isn't an easy truth. I would have a very difficult time trying to reconcile the Bible with theories on evolution. Both sound equally implausible. Fortunately, I don't have to. My faith is in God. What He tells me, I am compelled to believe and obey.
Originally posted by: BudAshes
If you believe in Christianity or any other faith based religion you shouldn't ever be able to use the word logic. Logic is against your religion.
Originally posted by: thepd7
Originally posted by: BudAshes
If you believe in Christianity or any other faith based religion you shouldn't ever be able to use the word logic. Logic is against your religion.
I look at nature and how incredible it is and I feel God's presence, so to me, logically, there is something greater than me that created all that wonderful nature and causes that incredible joy I get.
Go where? Mormons are even more loony than evangelical Christians. Thats almost common knowledge.Originally posted by: engineereeyore
Originally posted by: Garth
Ohhhhh you're a Mormon. I dare say you have larger problems, then.
:laugh:
You don't have the balls or the intelligence to go there, so don't even try it.
It is a category error to evaluate opinions as right or wrong. Of course, no one ever accused you of being a bastion of intelligence.From just a quick googling there seems to be some definite differences of opinion with regard to your interpretation of those verses.
Sure is. There's always a right and a wrong opinion on almost everything.
Try what? We've already established that you're impervious to reason, and the fact that you've bought into Mormonism confirms that you are a poor judge of facts. What is there to try?EDIT: If you are dumb enough to try it, as I suspect you may be, keep it to private messages as it is way off topic.
Originally posted by: Luthien
You know why christians "hate" atheists and any other belief so much? Because they threaten christianity's very nature. While in the midst of belief a christian cannot reconcile the self inflicted threat of hell and loss of a magical heaven. Failure to believe in a believers mind means they must give up heaven and suffer hell. The enduring threats they got suckered into believing has traped them. It will continue to trap them until they stop believing in heaven and hell but that means they are going to hell... I think you get the irony of this mind trap that religions love to use because it is so powerful; on top of that they will lose the social bonds that were created within the church and amongst fellow believers so moving on is a very scary thing. It is all no different than any cult. Christianity is a macrocosmic cult just like every other major world religion. The very threat that converted them traps them.
Originally posted by: Luthien
Originally posted by: 40sTheme
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: Ilikepiedoyou
so what is the point here? You call yourself a christian but follow the faith half assed? This isn't dispelling any stereotypes but instead showing that your not good at following your religion. Maybe the fallacy of you being a christian is just another in a lone line of which also includes the use of your user name to describe you?
What do you mean "follow it half-assed"? Most of the "prohibitions" she breaks are purely cultural impositions.
Yes; exactly. Would you rather her be one of the hating, ruthless Christians that give Christianity a bad name? I'm glad she isn't.
Sure, better than nothing, lol... Out of 10 on the fundamentanometer she is probably in the median which is still scary.
Originally posted by: Spartan Niner
Originally posted by: Luthien
You know why christians "hate" atheists and any other belief so much? Because they threaten christianity's very nature. While in the midst of belief a christian cannot reconcile the self inflicted threat of hell and loss of a magical heaven. Failure to believe in a believers mind means they must give up heaven and suffer hell. The enduring threats they got suckered into believing has traped them. It will continue to trap them until they stop believing in heaven and hell but that means they are going to hell... I think you get the irony of this mind trap that religions love to use because it is so powerful; on top of that they will lose the social bonds that were created within the church and amongst fellow believers so moving on is a very scary thing. It is all no different than any cult. Christianity is a macrocosmic cult just like every other major world religion. The very threat that converted them traps them.
Most Christians I know didn't become Christian because they were "afraid" of Hell or because they were "threatened". Stop being a troll and realize that everything you've said so far is what a small but vocal minority of "evangelical" right-wing reactionary Christians say.
Originally posted by: Luthien
Originally posted by: 40sTheme
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: Ilikepiedoyou
so what is the point here? You call yourself a christian but follow the faith half assed? This isn't dispelling any stereotypes but instead showing that your not good at following your religion. Maybe the fallacy of you being a christian is just another in a lone line of which also includes the use of your user name to describe you?
What do you mean "follow it half-assed"? Most of the "prohibitions" she breaks are purely cultural impositions.
Yes; exactly. Would you rather her be one of the hating, ruthless Christians that give Christianity a bad name? I'm glad she isn't.
Sure, better than nothing, lol... Out of 10 on the fundamentanometer she is probably in the median which is still scary.
If you're going to rate her from 1-10 on the "fundie" scale, she's pretty far to the left in her beliefs. But then again, "fundies" skew the distribution FAR to the right, because they are so reactionary.
IMO, people get too hung up on evolution versus creationism. I see several options there.
1) You subscribe to the literal 6-day creation by God, everything created then. No evolution
2) You subscribe to a non-literal "6-day" creation
3) You subscribe to an initial creation by God, and then evolution as the mechanism for changes following
4) You subscribe to the Big Bang/Primordial Soup something-out-of-nothing evolutionary view, which requires as much of a leap of faith
5) You ignore the issue of creation versus evolution, because it is not necessary for salvation
6) You realize that evolution and creation are not mutually exclusive
7) You realize that science and religion are definitely not mutually exclusive
This is by no means an all-inclusive list. I'll give you a hint at my stance though - it personally does not matter to me. That said, I'm a Christian who is a Biological Anthropology and Anatomy major + Religion minor. Talk about being well-educated on both sides of the argument...
Originally posted by: Spartan Niner
Originally posted by: Luthien
You know why christians "hate" atheists and any other belief so much? Because they threaten christianity's very nature. While in the midst of belief a christian cannot reconcile the self inflicted threat of hell and loss of a magical heaven. Failure to believe in a believers mind means they must give up heaven and suffer hell. The enduring threats they got suckered into believing has traped them. It will continue to trap them until they stop believing in heaven and hell but that means they are going to hell... I think you get the irony of this mind trap that religions love to use because it is so powerful; on top of that they will lose the social bonds that were created within the church and amongst fellow believers so moving on is a very scary thing. It is all no different than any cult. Christianity is a macrocosmic cult just like every other major world religion. The very threat that converted them traps them.
Most Christians I know didn't become Christian because they were "afraid" of Hell or because they were "threatened". Stop being a troll and realize that everything you've said so far is what a small but vocal minority of "evangelical" right-wing reactionary Christians say.
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: HotChic
Originally posted by: Luthien
Originally posted by: freedomsbeat212
Funny story - my sister, mom, and myself had a long conversation about Jesus and what he means. My mom is VERY religious, very educated in the bible, and her father and grandfather were both ministers. My sister was trying to go for the middle ground "Jesus is about love, about accepting your neighbors regardless of their faith and the bible is poetry, it shouldn't be taken literally." My mom stated that she's tired of liberals who don't really agree with the bible bending the words. God is VENGEFUL, the bible clearly states that there is only ONE PATH to salvation (which is accepting Jesus), Jesus DEMANDS that you give up ALL of your material wealth to go to heaven, the Bible clearly states that women are inferior, homosexuals are sinners, and that there is no middle ground. It also states taht you should have a child like faith - do not question, or you may face damnation.
My mom's point is that the bible is pretty blunt. You can agree or disagree, but don't try to mix hippy new age thoughts with the bible... That's post-modernism and the bible surely is not a post-modern text.
Excellent post!
Ah, at last we agree on something! Handshake and a happy end to the thread?![]()
Freedomsbeat, why do CHRISTIANS pick and choose what to follow from the Bible, while regarding it as infallible?
Originally posted by: Luthien
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: Luthien
Originally posted by: busmaster11
Originally posted by: Luthien
You know why christians "hate" atheists and any other belief so much? Because they threaten christianity's very nature. While in the midst of belief a christian cannot reconcile the self inflicted threat of hell and loss of a magical heaven. Failure to believe in a believers mind means they must give up heaven and suffer hell. The enduring threats they got suckered into believing has traped them. It will continue to trap them until they stop believing in heaven and hell but that means they are going to hell... I think you get the irony of this mind trap that religions love to use because it is so powerful; on top of that they will lose the social bonds that were created within the church and amongst fellow believers so moving on is a very scary thing. It is all no different than any cult. Christianity is a macrocosmic cult just like every other major world religion. The very threat that converted them traps them.
You're thinking from a strictly psychoanalytical perspective. Since you believe that hell is nothing more than a "self-inflicted threat" you clearly don't believe in God. So reasoning with you, again, is impossible, because the Lord has given the humble and the repentent a superior perspective through His Word.
God's perspective. We can get into the hundreds of pieces of scientific and archaeological evidence which points to a Creator (or Jesus specifically) but I don't believe it will do us any good. It did not do me any good...
Believers can only argue based on the premise that we rely on God's Word - and since you deny it, we'll just have to disagree and call it a day.
Yeah, I know your chosen and the rest of us are consigned to hell. Been there done that ad nauseam.
So, does all this scientific evidence prove the bible is litteral because if so I gotta hear these proofs.
i'm a christian, have been all my life, don't believe in the "hell" that is commonly concieved, to me, separation from God IS hell. and i don't believe in an eternal fire either.
as to hating non christians, nope, i don't hate non christians any more or less than i hate christians. i don't base my hatred of people simply on something generic as their belief system but based on my interactions with individual people. and christ discourages hatred.
your mocking tone is annoying though, we can have an intelligent conversation without the mocking.
it seems to me that many non christians / athiest are just as evangelical and full of hatred for christians as you claim christians feel for non believers. and it could be argued that this hatred stems from the same reason you claims christians hate, due to their own insecurities.
Already debated and as far as "stems from the same reason you claims christians hate, due to their own insecurities," that my friend comes from the intolerence the rest of us experience as we are being told day in and day out we are going to hell because we dont believe. Over and over this is tossed in our faces, yet somehow I am not to believe that the threat of hell is not a major force behind conversions; yeah right.
as we are being told day in and day out we are going to hell because we dont believe. Over and over this is tossed in our faces,
Originally posted by: HotChic
Originally posted by: SlitheryDee
Evolution may not be the last theory that goes around, but being able to scrap a theory and go in a different direction is one of the cool things about science. Scientists don't just change theories for nothing though. Every time a major change has occurred it has been because something new has been learned.
That means that while the facts we have may be right, our extrapolations or "theories" based on those facts will likely end up being wrong. This is not a bad thing. If a theory serves no purpose other than to lead researchers to evidence that ultimately discredits it, then it has increased our knowledge of the world around us.
I'm not trying to say that you should believe in evolution. I don't really view scientific theories as things to be believed in at all. Quite the contrary, they're things to be looked upon with interest and no small measure of doubt. What I'm wondering is why, since you can't reliably invest yourself in the current theory of origin, you feel the need to put something else in the place it would take in your belief system?
So evolution probably isn't the answer. Why do you think creationism IS the answer?
Did I say I did think that in my post?
