Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
The ...ush supporters are getting more and more defensive everyday, wonder why is that?
Wouldn't have anything to do with misinformed attacks though right?
DM - You seem to misunderstand what "taking responsibility" is. His admission and actions to correct his "problem" is exactly what "taking responsibility" is. He admitted the problem and took corrective action. You can bleat on and on about hypocracy or some percied illegalities but those are far from being proven. The one thing that has been addressed though is his personal drug addiction - for which he took responsibility for. The rest is speculation ATM.
CkG
Cad, you need to re-read my posts. I never said that Rush
didn't take personal responsibility. You might have misinterpreted my post where I was mentioning that it's not the media's fault that this story cropped up. IOW, don't blame the media, blame Rush.
In any event, I even gave Rush credit for taking responsibility. However, you're missing my point, which is: Rush only took responsibility AFTER the story broke and he was more or less forced to do so in light of his serious drug problem becoming public. There's a difference between that and (hypothetically) Rush coming out ahead of a major media story and admitting that he has a problem. See the difference? After the fact it's DAMAGE CONTROL, before the fact it's stepping up to the plate and admitting you have a problem without being FORCED to do so.
Sure, Rush could have denied he had a problem. He didn't, so he gets points for that, however if you don't see the difference between my two scenarios, then you're mind is hopelessly clouded by dittomania.