boomerang
Lifer
- Jun 19, 2000
- 18,883
- 641
- 126
What???I find it kinda funny that Virginia was one of the states to deny global warming ... Maybe they will wake up when their asses are under water? Hmmmmm
What???I find it kinda funny that Virginia was one of the states to deny global warming ... Maybe they will wake up when their asses are under water? Hmmmmm
The left like always wants to create super victems. Is it an event, yes?
Is it this super death storm that is wiping out the east coast? doubt it.
costly storm is a terrible measure of impact - population density, hitting a high value area will do that, as will inflation
Who ever said anything about it wiping out the east coast?
6 million without power, records broken in water height, many billions in damages. Do you guys need thousands of people to die for something to be an event?
Cost of storm is not a terrible way to measure impact because of density, unless you think that a cat 5 storm hitting an area with zero people is a bigger deal than a low cat hitting with millions (apparently you do?). Because if the latter, there was a major storm in the antarctic region yesterday and another one today. It's going to be devastating on the ice bergs in the area.
Epic hype. Thats all it is and people are catching on. Since Catrina, people play it so damn safe, that its nothing more than crying wolf to the extreme just so noone can say that they weren't warned. The reports on the storm will evaporate faster than the light showers that it produces.
(OP was infracted for trolling. -DrPizza)
Surging seawater forced ashore by Hurricane Sandy flooded seven New York subway tunnels and six bus garages in the worst disaster in the history of city transport, the network's chief said on Tuesday.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PG5QWMpDDo0&feature=player_embedded#!
Explosion at power station in Manhattan
nice little non-event there.
Umm, only people like YOU ever called it a super death storm.
That's very clever.
I like how people think if the storm isn't the storm of all storms, it is "non-event".
This storm was not overhyped. It has done the damages and such as expected. And with it merging with a cold front, is expected to rain hard still yet in the areas for 2+ days.
Its to early to make that claim.
No, it really isn't. The news said it had the potential to be the worst storm to hit the east coast in a very long time, if not ever. Based on what actually happened was saying that wrong? Nope. This is not 1800 and the only warning of a storm is the fact a tidal wave just hit you. Models and public awareness alone are the reason why so few have died from this. The truth is you're not likely to ever have a weather event that causes thousands of deaths in the US.wrong, thats the short version of the news for the past few days.
Its to early to make that claim.
The amount of retard in this thread makes me fear for humanity's gene pool.
Your entire argument is that the lack of major losses of life means it's not an event. Yet, the only reason there HASN'T been a major loss of life is that people were warning others that this WAS a major event and to take appropriate precautions (which you rage against them doing in the first place, calling it "overhyped").
So, if they hadn't called it a major event, people wouldn't have taken precautions and there would have been significantly more deaths, making it a major event in your mind.
Logic win!
I'm currently leaning towards yes, based on the early news reports, vs the gloom and doom, end of the world stories the news put out.
Did I say it was a non event?
No.
So go talk a long walk of a short pier.
I just said its to early to say if the story was overhyped.
I'm currently leaning towards yes, based on the early news reports, vs the gloom and doom, end of the world stories the news put out.
oh noes, a transformer blew. end of the world. sky is falling, the sky is falling.
that's a little more that a transformer on a pole blowing, that is a power substation going boom