HR 1 urgently needs to pass through filibuster

Page 22 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,222
55,760
136
Yeah it's a good thing we got that one passed. From reading his editorial, it sounds like he won't vote for anything else based on budget reconciliation either. Meaning that bill is the last consequential bill which will be passed by this administration. Entirely due to him. He literally just decided to shut down his party's entire legislative agenda.
We will see - I suspect that turns out not to be true.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,256
136
I wonder how much of it is genuinely held belief about bipartisanship and how much is just an excuse for not wanting to do certain things.

Regardless, he’s the reason Biden’s COVID bill that’s helping millions exists. Before you hate him too much, that’s worth considering.
The thing is, the filibuster doesn't promote bipartisanship, it blocks it. If a bill was going to pass no matter what, there is some chance some minority party people jump on with a few concessions. With 60 it's just cock blocked.

The filibuster as it stands today was invented like 11 years ago, I don't get why these dumbfucks act like it was handed down from the founding fathers (who actually, purposefully, made the Senate a majority vote house).

Also, how dumb do you have to be to unilaterally disarm? This is just telling the republicans they have nothing to fear, no reason to even attempt bipartisanship.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,723
17,359
136
The thing is, the filibuster doesn't promote bipartisanship, it blocks it. If a bill was going to pass no matter what, there is some chance some minority party people jump on with a few concessions. With 60 it's just cock blocked.

The filibuster as it stands today was invented like 11 years ago, I don't get why these dumbfucks act like it was handed down from the founding fathers (who actually, purposefully, made the Senate a majority vote house).

Also, how dumb do you have to be to unilaterally disarm? This is just telling the republicans they have nothing to fear, no reason to even attempt bipartisanship.

If you haven’t figured it out yet, democrats are their own worst enemies.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,244
136
If you haven’t figured it out yet, democrats are their own worst enemies.

Yeah, if that's what he's actually doing. It's hard to determine if he is really this naïve, or if he isn't being candid about his real motives. I mean, no one could actually in all seriousness believe we're going to get 10 repug votes for anything. Maybe if we had 58 seats then I can see it making some sense. But not with 50 seats. There is just no way to rationalize what he is saying.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo and dank69

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,770
126
If you haven’t figured it out yet, democrats are their own worst enemies.
Not like the GOP didn't come out looking like epic morons backing the "they stole the election!" shit from trump, cost them the senate, (not that it matters much now).
 

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,770
126
Yeah, if that's what he's actually doing. It's hard to determine if he is really this naïve, or if he isn't being candid about his real motives. I mean, no one could actually in all seriousness believe we're going to get 10 repug votes for anything. Maybe if we had 58 seats then I can see it making some sense. But not with 50 seats. There is just no way to rationalize what he is saying.
To put heat on this epic fool let these bills come to the floor for debate/negotiation, then when Mitch remains Mitch and will offer close to nothing in those negotiations drop the hammer on Man-shit. We tried it your way asshole and got squat in return, NOW can your puny brain understand?. Your constituents in WV could use that infrastructure plan as much as anybody shit-for-brains.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo and dank69

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,610
33,330
136
A theory I can get behind:
AKKLN17.jpg
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,222
55,760
136
But why? Is he a closet Republican?
I mean clearly he’s not a Republican. I don’t know why he doesn’t support those various initiatives but he’s not an idiot. He knows there won’t be 60 votes for them, and he also knows they could pass a lot of them with 50 votes if he wanted to. The most likely answer is for whatever reason he doesn’t want to.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,222
55,760
136
I would think this idea will go nowhere with the filibuster intact.

It very likely won’t go anywhere without it intact either. Democrats would probably need at least 3 or so more senators to accomplish that.

This is why HR1 (or at least the gerrymandering parts of it) are so important. Democrats very well may pick up a couple senate seats in 2022 but their house majority is probably doomed unless they win by around 5-6 points, which would be nearly unprecedented in modern times for the president’s party. They can’t win just by getting the most votes, they need blowout wins every time just to stay even because the field is so biased against them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo and BUTCH1

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,710
16,005
136
Wouldnt Adam Kinzinger make a better Manchin than Manchin? Seriously? Cant you flip him?
 

Amol S.

Platinum Member
Mar 14, 2015
2,587
783
136
There is an alternative way to get something like HR-1 passed in a manner that acts like HR1, but really is not HR1. Basically all the law suits against the new voting laws reach the US Supreme Court, and the new laws are declared unconstitutional. It would almost be like HR1. Maybe that is what Manchin is currently thinking will happen.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,406
136
There is an alternative way to get something like HR-1 passed in a manner that acts like HR1, but really is not HR1. Basically all the law suits against the new voting laws reach the US Supreme Court, and the new laws are declared unconstitutional. It would almost be like HR1. Maybe that is what Manchin is currently thinking will happen.

Pretty much. I say trim HR1 down to donations and citizen drawn redistricting.
Those are super popular with everyone D or R or I
 

weblooker2021

Senior member
Jan 18, 2021
749
254
96
There is an alternative way to get something like HR-1 passed in a manner that acts like HR1, but really is not HR1. Basically all the law suits against the new voting laws reach the US Supreme Court, and the new laws are declared unconstitutional. It would almost be like HR1. Maybe that is what Manchin is currently thinking will happen.
SCTOUS is 6-3 conservative, i am not seeing it happening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo and dank69

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,244
136
100 scholars of government and political science issue an open letter stating that if we don't end the filibuster and pass HR1, democracy in America is in grave danger.

 

mect

Platinum Member
Jan 5, 2004
2,424
1,637
136
100 scholars of government and political science issue an open letter stating that if we don't end the filibuster and pass HR1, democracy in America is in grave danger.

These scholars include leading experts on failed democracies. I don't think our country is thinking clearly enough to care at the moment, unfortunately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo and iRONic