• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

How will Subway pitchman Jared Fogle weather FBI investigation?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I am in no way accusing Jared of anything, but it strikes me as strange that his attorney has stated that he is cooperating with the investigation, but has NOT stated that he is not guilty. That may be a by-product of the fact that this guy is not a criminal lawyer, but it's odd that he is not denying Fogle's guilt.
 
Why do I get the sense that half the guys so intent on defending Jared are into kiddie porn themselves?
 
He runs his foundation mostly out of his house. This is clearly about the guy who was busted, and they are still investigating.

Again, Jared's home served as as workplace. This is about an employee who committed crimes, probably at work, and therefore some of Jared's equipment may serve as evidence.

That's all this is.

WTF is everyone so eager to throw people under the bus?

OK, glad you can get past the "Jared isn't involved" part, because owning computers with child porn in your house, business or no, if you put the data there or not, means you're fucking involved.

Show me where I threw him under the bus. I specifically said he may or may not be guilty and (if he's charged) he's due his day in court.

That's pretty much the opposite of throwing him under the bus.
 
Why do I get the sense that half the guys so intent on defending Jared are into kiddie porn themselves?

Or they can believe in innocent until proven guilty. It's fucks like you that take an accusation and destroy someones life.

considering he has not been arrested or charged with anything (yet).

LOL, a LOT of people have porn on their computers but once again it's irrelevant if you have 2Gb or 20 Tb as long as it does not involve minors.

rofl. very true
 
http://nypost.com/2015/07/07/home-of-subways-jared-raided-in-child-porn-probe/

I don't eat at Subway, but if I did, I would boycott them at least until more is released to the public.

well you shouldn't eat subway anyway. but what do they have to do with it? they will fire him in due time. unfortunately even though he hasn't been charged with anything it's going to ruin his reputation.

hell you can see people in the thread already saying he is guilty.


oops spoke to soon.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/07/feds-police-search-home-subway-pitchman-jared-fogle/

Subway restaurants announced Tuesday they're suspending their relationship with spokesman Jared Fogle after state and federal authorities descended on his home, just two months after the former director of his charitable foundation was arrested on child pornography charges.
 
http://www.kgw.com/

They seem to be using the exact same templates no less. WFAA's page is basically identical to KGW's and they aren't even the same station (ABC vs NBC).

It is terrible design and I had no idea it was that widespread.

Viper GTS

There is a reason for that. All stations owned by or affiliated with Tegna(formerly Gannett) or have support service contracts with Tegna ALL use the same website template. That is Tegna's web platform.
 
There is a reason for that. All stations owned by or affiliated with Tegna(formerly Gannett) or have support service contracts with Tegna ALL use the same website template. That is Tegna's web platform.

Unfortunately I googled it before you fixed the transposed letters (or maybe I just misread them) Tegna != Tenga. 🙁

Was not aware of that particularly organization and I work in TV (and have done work in KGW's facility).

Viper GTS
 
Why do I get the sense that half the guys so intent on defending Jared are into kiddie porn themselves?

Can't imagine why.

Nancy_Grace-1.jpg
 
Why do I get the sense that half the guys so intent on defending Jared are into kiddie porn themselves?

I suspect there are individuals that throw a wide net into the internet to catch and collect porn and are afraid that something bad might be lurking in the terabytes of collected porn they own.

So they get all defensive every time they hear a story about cops taking computers.


BTW: Cops can't just come in and take computers without some kind of hard reasonable suspicion if they want a judge to sign the warrant.
 
I suspect there are individuals that throw a wide net into the internet to catch and collect porn and are afraid that something bad might be lurking in the terabytes of collected porn they own.

So they get all defensive every time they hear a story about cops taking computers.
I used to dl a lot of stuff from usenet sight unseen. It's amazing (and a little frightening) some of the shit that can end up on your hard drive w/o realizing it.
 
Why do I get the sense that half the guys so intent on defending Jared are into kiddie porn themselves?

Your "sense" is wrong, and what a FUCKED UP thing to say, if I ever saw anyone abusing a kid like that I'd kick his ass to China and back. All I was saying is being investigated does not mean your guilty of anything, you apparently think it does.
 
And my favorite part:

- In 2007, a source told Best Week Ever that Fogle used to run a black market porn video rental business out of his dorm room, while he was a student at Indiana University.

According to the source, the porn collection was 'vast and extensive' and something Fogle took 'pretty seriously' - charging fellow students a dollar a day to rent them.

The source also claimed that Fogle's legendary Subway diet stemmed from his 'extreme laziness' and the need to man his the porn business in his room.

Subway allegedly opened a branch in his building and it was 'the closest fast food available'.

I find it hard to believe a person with black market child porn ring leader in their background would voluntarily become a public figure. And its not just that he used to watch it...if someone can point to you in a line up and say 'I got the child porn from him!', you stay out of the public eye. He would have been blackmailed by someone as soon as he became famous.
 
Shouldn't the real news be focused on the former head of his nonprofit foundation and how he mixed the organization's files with his porn collection?
If he is innocent and judging from history, I'd say his image is already permanently tarnished and Subway will probably end up ditching him completely within a month or so and will quickly find a new ad campaign in veiled attempts to wipe away the memories.

The problem imo is the intense media coverage and how they portray it, they make it big news by their focus even though it really isn't at this point. Channel 8 news literally made a 30 second self promotion stating how they were the first on the scene at Jered's house and therefore always first with the news. I thought it was kind of sad that they used Jered as their step stool to tell channel 8 viewers how they are the most up to date on news just because they arrived on scene at Jared's house first...really? To fuck with jared though right channel 8?

Imo, the news should have focused briefly just stating the facts about how this is due to the involvement of his former head, Taylor and the fact that Taylor mixed work files with his kid porn collection?...not this let's spend 10 minutes talking about Jared himself, at least not yet, instead I must have heard the term child pornography ring a dozen times as they showed Jared and the FBI walking about with little mention of Taylor or why the FBI is raiding Jared.

Everyone was quick with the crappy jokes
jokes about the “five-dollar footlongs” Fogle might soon be encountering in prison,
 
Shouldn't the real news be focused on the former head of his nonprofit foundation and how he mixed the organization's files with his porn collection?
If he is innocent and judging from history, I'd say his image is already permanently tarnished and Subway will probably end up ditching him completely within a month or so and will quickly find a new ad campaign in veiled attempts to wipe away the memories.

The problem imo is the intense media coverage and how they portray it, they make it big news by their focus even though it really isn't at this point. Channel 8 news literally made a 30 second self promotion stating how they were the first on the scene at Jered's house and therefore always first with the news. I thought it was kind of sad that they used Jered as their step stool to tell channel 8 viewers how they are the most up to date on news just because they arrived on scene at Jared's house first...really? To fuck with jared though right channel 8?

Imo, the news should have focused briefly just stating the facts about how this is due to the involvement of his former head, Taylor and the fact that Taylor mixed work files with his kid porn collection?...not this let's spend 10 minutes talking about Jared himself, at least not yet, instead I must have heard the term child pornography ring a dozen times as they showed Jared and the FBI walking about with little mention of Taylor or why the FBI is raiding Jared.

Everyone was quick with the crappy jokes

Welcome to the new America, if your under investigation your guilty by the Media's standard, Don Henley was right, "Dirty laundry" is the name of this game.
 
Yes, because a bunch of cops always show up with subpoenas to seize your computers when you're innocent right?

I note a bit of sarcasm in your statement.

The serious answer to your question is YES a bunch of cops show up with subpoenas to seize your computers when you're innocent, because if you were found guilty the investigation would already be over by that point.
 
I think that the term you're looking for is "Probable Cause". Not just "Suspicion".

Correct. It's possible the former exec of his company sang a little birdy song in prison. That certainly would rise to probable cause, but who knows? This guy hasn't been arrested or accused of a crime yet, so more to come.

I also hate this kind of "wink wink" coverage. You know, JARED INVESTIVATED FOR BAD STUFF, COMPUTERS SEIZEDS, no charges yet lol
 
Why do I get the sense that half the guys so intent on defending Jared are into kiddie porn themselves?

Actually, like homophobes, those who accuse others of it vehemently are probably guilty of it.

You might want to shred your hard drives madoka, never know when the FBI will be showing up at your door...
 
Back
Top