How to do it in MATLAB??

Mday

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
18,647
1
81
what do you mean by u(t-tau)?

do you mean the function named u of t-tau, where tau is a constant, and t is the variable?
 

Mday

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
18,647
1
81
i'll do the first for you...

L{n} is the laplace transform of n

s is the variable of laplace

exp(t) is e^t...

--

looking at the table of laplace transforms yields this g(t)*v(t-a) ==> exp(-as)L{g(t+a)}(s), where a is a positive number.

so, for your first problem, exp(-t)*u(t-tau), g(t) is exp(-t), and a is tau.

continuing...

exp(-as) L{exp(-(t+a))} (s)

exp(-as) L{[exp(-t)][exp(-a)]} (s)

since exp(-a) is a constant, you're allowed to factor it out, of the L{}...

exp(-as-a) L{exp(-t)} (s)

continuing... after some minor rearranging... and looking in the tables once again...

exp(-a(s+1)) (1/(s+1)) (s) is your answer.
 

Mday

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
18,647
1
81
the second one is similar, but instead of g(t) = exp(-t), you have g(t) = exp(-(t-tau))... note you can FACTOR out the constant ;-)
 

Mday

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
18,647
1
81
uh depends on what you mean by term

when you do the laplace transform, you can factor out that extra constant, exp(-a) which you can integrate into that exp function...
 

dopcombo

Golden Member
Nov 14, 2000
1,394
0
0
I seriously dun think people should be helping others do their hw...
how's he ever gonna learn then..
 

Mday

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
18,647
1
81


<< so exp(-tau) is a constant and the laplace of that is 1/s right? >>



uh, not quite... that's if you do a laplace transform of A constant...

by factoring out the constant i am referring to this property of the transform... L{cf(t)} = cL{f(t)}


//edit where c is a constant, and f is the function, t being the variable, L being the transform
 

flood

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 1999
4,213
0
76
matlab makes things like this so much easier
too bad i never use it :confused:
 

heat23

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
3,998
9
81
www.heatware.com
so, for your first problem, exp(-t)*u(t-tau), g(t) is exp(-t), and a is tau.

continuing...

exp(-as) L{exp(-(t+a))} (s)


are you using some kind of variable substituion?? cuz from exp(-t) u split it to exp(-as) and exp(-(t+a))
 

Mday

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
18,647
1
81
what i meant was... the general lapace transformation formula for some expression in the form of

g(t) u(t-a), a>=0

is this...

exp(-as) * L{g(t+a} * (s)

with that general formula...

since YOUR expression was... exp(-t) * u(t-tau)... compared to the general formula... g(t) from the formula is your exp(-t)... since the second part is u(t-tau), with respect to the formula, a is tau...

i also used a as the character representation of tau if you're confused... if so, i apologize for it...