• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

How to do it in MATLAB??

heat23

Elite Member
whats the laplace transform of e^(-t) * u(t-tau)
and also e^-(t-tau) * u(t-tau)

thanks 🙂
 
what do you mean by u(t-tau)?

do you mean the function named u of t-tau, where tau is a constant, and t is the variable?
 
i'll do the first for you...

L{n} is the laplace transform of n

s is the variable of laplace

exp(t) is e^t...

--

looking at the table of laplace transforms yields this g(t)*v(t-a) ==> exp(-as)L{g(t+a)}(s), where a is a positive number.

so, for your first problem, exp(-t)*u(t-tau), g(t) is exp(-t), and a is tau.

continuing...

exp(-as) L{exp(-(t+a))} (s)

exp(-as) L{[exp(-t)][exp(-a)]} (s)

since exp(-a) is a constant, you're allowed to factor it out, of the L{}...

exp(-as-a) L{exp(-t)} (s)

continuing... after some minor rearranging... and looking in the tables once again...

exp(-a(s+1)) (1/(s+1)) (s) is your answer.
 
the second one is similar, but instead of g(t) = exp(-t), you have g(t) = exp(-(t-tau))... note you can FACTOR out the constant ;-)
 
uh depends on what you mean by term

when you do the laplace transform, you can factor out that extra constant, exp(-a) which you can integrate into that exp function...
 


<< so exp(-tau) is a constant and the laplace of that is 1/s right? >>



uh, not quite... that's if you do a laplace transform of A constant...

by factoring out the constant i am referring to this property of the transform... L{cf(t)} = cL{f(t)}


//edit where c is a constant, and f is the function, t being the variable, L being the transform
 
so, for your first problem, exp(-t)*u(t-tau), g(t) is exp(-t), and a is tau.

continuing...

exp(-as) L{exp(-(t+a))} (s)


are you using some kind of variable substituion?? cuz from exp(-t) u split it to exp(-as) and exp(-(t+a))
 
what i meant was... the general lapace transformation formula for some expression in the form of

g(t) u(t-a), a>=0

is this...

exp(-as) * L{g(t+a} * (s)

with that general formula...

since YOUR expression was... exp(-t) * u(t-tau)... compared to the general formula... g(t) from the formula is your exp(-t)... since the second part is u(t-tau), with respect to the formula, a is tau...

i also used a as the character representation of tau if you're confused... if so, i apologize for it...
 
Back
Top