How much longer will Obama last?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Yes actually. you and the others putting your jealousy of me out there is quite something for all to see.

Epic fail on all of your parts :laugh:

:confused:

I really really want to respond to this, but I'm trying to swear off of responding to this fool.

 

Obsoleet

Platinum Member
Oct 2, 2007
2,181
1
0
Independent here. Voted for Obama. So far, he's been better than Bush. I'd like to see the wars either shutdown or finally a comprehensible explanation as to why they're going on. Other than that, I'll likely be voting for Obama again in 2012.
Also, I think I'd like to see a heavily regulated insurance industry rather than a public option. Romney should've been run in 2008 honestly, crazy mormon or not he'd had a shot at my vote due to his less warlike nature.

One thing I'd like for Republicans to change is the projection that war is cool and a positive, patriotic thing in any way shape or form. Seeing the flag connected to the gun and the cross is a pretty disgusting combo.
 

Kirby

Lifer
Apr 10, 2006
12,028
2
0
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Yes actually. you and the others putting your jealousy of me out there is quite something for all to see.

Epic fail on all of your parts :laugh:

:confused:

I really really want to respond to this, but I'm trying to swear off of responding to this fool.

Do it, Moose. Do it for the lulz. :hullah:
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
Repeal of term limits would have been cool if they happened in time to see Bush run again, just so I could see how badly he would've gotten his ass handed to him, as well as shut up the idiots that still believed in him. :shocked:
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
Originally posted by: Vic
Landslide re-election in 2012. Taking bets now.

I would bet you since it should be a sure thing. However, the GOP could pull a Kerry. That is have someone who by all rights should be easy to defeat in a presidential election... but nominate such a buffoon that America has no choice but to vote for the incumbent.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
My prediction is he's going to pull out all the troops from Iraq and win the 2012 election.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: Obsoleet
Independent here. Voted for Obama. So far, he's been better than Bush. I'd like to see the wars either shutdown or finally a comprehensible explanation as to why they're going on. Other than that, I'll likely be voting for Obama again in 2012.
Also, I think I'd like to see a heavily regulated insurance industry rather than a public option. Romney should've been run in 2008 honestly, crazy mormon or not he'd had a shot at my vote due to his less warlike nature.

One thing I'd like for Republicans to change is the projection that war is cool and a positive, patriotic thing in any way shape or form. Seeing the flag connected to the gun and the cross is a pretty disgusting combo.

lol you're not an "Independent."
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,233
55,781
136
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Obsoleet
Independent here. Voted for Obama. So far, he's been better than Bush. I'd like to see the wars either shutdown or finally a comprehensible explanation as to why they're going on. Other than that, I'll likely be voting for Obama again in 2012.
Also, I think I'd like to see a heavily regulated insurance industry rather than a public option. Romney should've been run in 2008 honestly, crazy mormon or not he'd had a shot at my vote due to his less warlike nature.

One thing I'd like for Republicans to change is the projection that war is cool and a positive, patriotic thing in any way shape or form. Seeing the flag connected to the gun and the cross is a pretty disgusting combo.

lol you're not an "Independent."

Explain?
 

Duwelon

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,058
0
0
Originally posted by: Obsoleet
Independent here. Voted for Obama. So far, he's been better than Bush. I'd like to see the wars either shutdown or finally a comprehensible explanation as to why they're going on. Other than that, I'll likely be voting for Obama again in 2012.
Also, I think I'd like to see a heavily regulated insurance industry rather than a public option. Romney should've been run in 2008 honestly, crazy mormon or not he'd had a shot at my vote due to his less warlike nature.

One thing I'd like for Republicans to change is the projection that war is cool and a positive, patriotic thing in any way shape or form. Seeing the flag connected to the gun and the cross is a pretty disgusting combo.

If brave men and women stood up and fought back against tyrants, this world would be a lot more peaceful place. Instead, we have spaghetti spined cowards predominately on the left who let tyrants run amok that cause thousands of times more harm than a war to remove them would because good people didn't stop them. Life isn't fair and tyrants don't give up their power willingly. Sacrifices must be made to remove them, whether it's a relatively quick "tear off the bandaid" of a war or the slow, agonizing misery of letting a tyrant keep an iron grip on their people at the edge of a gun, is our choice.

All my friends who supported the invasion of Iraq supported it on the grounds alone that Saddam was an evil SOB who needed to be disposed of like Hitler was. Too many Americans however turn their heads at the slow agonizing suffering of people under a dictator, so it's no wonder they're opposed to ending the suffering through military action.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: spidey07
He's done.

And for the millionth time, who will beat him in '12???

Palin? Romney? Huckabee?

Good luck with that.

reelections are inevitably more about the guy already in office than the guy running against him.

if Obama's numbers continue to slide and the GOP runs someone semi-competant against him (note: it will absolutely not be Palin or Huckabee. I'd put safe money on that. I don't think it will be Romney either), I think it could be a real fight.

of course, Obama's numbers could rebound and it could be 1996 all over again. it's a long way away. much too long to say with certainty that he's done but also much too long to say that the GOP is dead and buried.
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Originally posted by: mizzou
I'm sick of people hoarding things I want to buy because they are afraid Obama is going to steal it.

I'm sick of people worrying that the world is going to end because Obama will "change" it.

you can't fix crazy, you can only lock it up in a rubber room and hope it doesn't get out
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Originally posted by: Vic
Landslide re-election in 2012. Taking bets now.

you betcha?

and this is why:

Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Obsoleet
Independent here. Voted for Obama. So far, he's been better than Bush. I'd like to see the wars either shutdown or finally a comprehensible explanation as to why they're going on. Other than that, I'll likely be voting for Obama again in 2012.
Also, I think I'd like to see a heavily regulated insurance industry rather than a public option. Romney should've been run in 2008 honestly, crazy mormon or not he'd had a shot at my vote due to his less warlike nature.

One thing I'd like for Republicans to change is the projection that war is cool and a positive, patriotic thing in any way shape or form. Seeing the flag connected to the gun and the cross is a pretty disgusting combo.

lol you're not an "Independent."

Not lock-step far right? Reps don't want you. They don't want specter, powell, snowe or anything resembling moderate. A shrinking white old conservative religious powerbase in a country leaning younger, more diverse, more secular.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
14,024
11,731
136
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: spidey07
He's done.

And for the millionth time, who will beat him in '12???

Palin? Romney? Huckabee?

Good luck with that.

reelections are inevitably more about the guy already in office than the guy running against him.

if Obama's numbers continue to slide and the GOP runs someone semi-competant against him (note: it will absolutely not be Palin or Huckabee. I'd put safe money on that. I don't think it will be Romney either), I think it could be a real fight.

of course, Obama's numbers could rebound and it could be 1996 all over again. it's a long way away. much too long to say with certainty that he's done but also much too long to say that the GOP is dead and buried.

If that were true, then W would have never even sniffed a 2nd term.

As long as the "leaders" of the GOP are more like Palin and less like ...... uh ....... someone sane, he's in a very good position to get re-elected.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: spidey07
He's done.

And for the millionth time, who will beat him in '12???

Palin? Romney? Huckabee?

Good luck with that.

reelections are inevitably more about the guy already in office than the guy running against him.

if Obama's numbers continue to slide and the GOP runs someone semi-competant against him (note: it will absolutely not be Palin or Huckabee. I'd put safe money on that. I don't think it will be Romney either), I think it could be a real fight.

of course, Obama's numbers could rebound and it could be 1996 all over again. it's a long way away. much too long to say with certainty that he's done but also much too long to say that the GOP is dead and buried.

I will never understand how GHB got one term and GWB got two, must be the anti drug policy.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
Originally posted by: Pens1566

If that were true, then W would have never even sniffed a 2nd term.

As long as the "leaders" of the GOP are more like Palin and less like ...... uh ....... someone sane, he's in a very good position to get re-elected.

I think 2004 was the exception to the rule... mostly because GWB ran a great campaign and John Kerry ran a spectacularly bad one (not that it stopped me from voting for him)
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I will never understand how GHB got one term and GWB got two, must be the anti drug policy.

1. "no new taxes"
2. Ross Perot
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Everyone on this thread is thinking a too long time frame when talking 11/2012. Its the 11/2010 elections that are going to be the ball game.

The GOP delusion is in thinking they can stop the Obama agenda on various reforms, they will be rewarded by the American people in the election of 11/2010. Which is the same exact GOP delusion the GOP operated on in stopping any of the democratic agenda in the last two years of GWB. And while the GOP was immensely proud of itself in largely blunting all the democratic agendas during the 2007-2009 time frame, when it came to for the American people to reward the GOP, they got a rather ugly dope slap at the polls instead.

Right now Obama may be rather naive on thinking that the GOP can be reasoned with or will be anything other than obstructionists, but with some patience, all good things may come to democrats who wait, because after the election of 2010, there may not be enough republirats left to even bother to consult.

After all, many of these reforms are decades and decades over due, will a year and two months really matter? Its what sustained the policies of Reid and Pelosi during the last dark days of GWB, as they were smart enough not to shut down government just to have their way, and even now the GOP tries to shut down government while it still has the last vestiges of the tyranny of the minority.

Oh, how much further can the proud party of Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt still fall before there is nothing left?
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield
I will never understand how GHB got one term and GWB got two, must be the anti drug policy.

1. "no new taxes"
2. Ross Perot

You missed the joke... :(

I did indeed. We're just not connecting today.
 

Zedtom

Platinum Member
Nov 23, 2001
2,146
0
0
Originally posted by: Lemon law
^text^

Amen to all that.

I don't believe that Democrats are gloating or rubbing it in when they make predictions about the demise of the Republican party. The self-defeating attitude that permeates the party as evidenced by these absurd reactions to the President's speech to the high school kids is what makes people turn away.


 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Everyone on this thread is thinking a too long time frame when talking 11/2012. Its the 11/2010 elections that are going to be the ball game.

The GOP delusion is in thinking they can stop the Obama agenda on various reforms, they will be rewarded by the American people in the election of 11/2010. Which is the same exact GOP delusion the GOP operated on in stopping any of the democratic agenda in the last two years of GWB. And while the GOP was immensely proud of itself in largely blunting all the democratic agendas during the 2007-2009 time frame, when it came to for the American people to reward the GOP, they got a rather ugly dope slap at the polls instead.

Right now Obama may be rather naive on thinking that the GOP can be reasoned with or will be anything other than obstructionists, but with some patience, all good things may come to democrats who wait, because after the election of 2010, there may not be enough republirats left to even bother to consult.

After all, many of these reforms are decades and decades over due, will a year and two months really matter? Its what sustained the policies of Reid and Pelosi during the last dark days of GWB, as they were smart enough not to shut down government just to have their way, and even now the GOP tries to shut down government while it still has the last vestiges of the tyranny of the minority.

Oh, how much further can the proud party of Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt still fall before there is nothing left?

idk, it seems like the Democrats have this delusion that the GOP is affecting their agenda.

the democrats have enough votes to pass whatever the hell they want to through either chamber of congress, even if the republicans tried to filibuster; their problem is their own party.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,233
55,781
136
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Everyone on this thread is thinking a too long time frame when talking 11/2012. Its the 11/2010 elections that are going to be the ball game.

The GOP delusion is in thinking they can stop the Obama agenda on various reforms, they will be rewarded by the American people in the election of 11/2010. Which is the same exact GOP delusion the GOP operated on in stopping any of the democratic agenda in the last two years of GWB. And while the GOP was immensely proud of itself in largely blunting all the democratic agendas during the 2007-2009 time frame, when it came to for the American people to reward the GOP, they got a rather ugly dope slap at the polls instead.

Right now Obama may be rather naive on thinking that the GOP can be reasoned with or will be anything other than obstructionists, but with some patience, all good things may come to democrats who wait, because after the election of 2010, there may not be enough republirats left to even bother to consult.

After all, many of these reforms are decades and decades over due, will a year and two months really matter? Its what sustained the policies of Reid and Pelosi during the last dark days of GWB, as they were smart enough not to shut down government just to have their way, and even now the GOP tries to shut down government while it still has the last vestiges of the tyranny of the minority.

Oh, how much further can the proud party of Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt still fall before there is nothing left?

idk, it seems like the Democrats have this delusion that the GOP is affecting their agenda.

the democrats have enough votes to pass whatever the hell they want to through either chamber of congress, even if the republicans tried to filibuster; their problem is their own party.

I don't get this reasoning at all. Say they were trying to pass a bill and they needed 60 votes to pass it and it ends up 59-41. 40 Republicans voted against it and 1 Democrat did, but by your logic the party we should blame is the Democrats? That's ridiculous.

The Republicans have gone into all-out obstruction. The Democrats do have the votes necessary to implement their agenda, and their failure to do so should most definitely reflect very badly on them. Let's not pretend that there aren't 40 people in the Senate chamber who are working at all times to defeat them though, and they are in no way absolved for their behavior.
 

CitizenKain

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2000
4,480
14
76
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: Obsoleet
Independent here. Voted for Obama. So far, he's been better than Bush. I'd like to see the wars either shutdown or finally a comprehensible explanation as to why they're going on. Other than that, I'll likely be voting for Obama again in 2012.
Also, I think I'd like to see a heavily regulated insurance industry rather than a public option. Romney should've been run in 2008 honestly, crazy mormon or not he'd had a shot at my vote due to his less warlike nature.

One thing I'd like for Republicans to change is the projection that war is cool and a positive, patriotic thing in any way shape or form. Seeing the flag connected to the gun and the cross is a pretty disgusting combo.

If brave men and women stood up and fought back against tyrants, this world would be a lot more peaceful place. Instead, we have spaghetti spined cowards predominately on the left who let tyrants run amok that cause thousands of times more harm than a war to remove them would because good people didn't stop them. Life isn't fair and tyrants don't give up their power willingly. Sacrifices must be made to remove them, whether it's a relatively quick "tear off the bandaid" of a war or the slow, agonizing misery of letting a tyrant keep an iron grip on their people at the edge of a gun, is our choice.

All my friends who supported the invasion of Iraq supported it on the grounds alone that Saddam was an evil SOB who needed to be disposed of like Hitler was. Too many Americans however turn their heads at the slow agonizing suffering of people under a dictator, so it's no wonder they're opposed to ending the suffering through military action.

Which is why you joined the service as soon as you were able to right? There is no way you'd cower over here instead of signing up.