RagingBITCH
Lifer
100% depends on the woman. If I respect her, definitely no first date sex. And then in that case, could be anywhere from a few dates to longer. I don't think it's absolutely crucial until you're exclusive.
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
I think my GF and I waited like 6 months...and then it was her initiative.
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
Originally posted by: Eghck
Originally posted by: toekramp
3 dates or so
yeah I would say 3 or 4 as well, of course there are exceptions...
I hope you filthy people get tested for disease.
I would say at minimum 3 or 4 months, not dates.
If a girl tried to get in my pants on the 3rd date I would dump her ass. Why? Think of how many dudes she's slept with. Disgusting.
Somehow, I'm guessing this isn't a problem you have very often.
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
I call shens on 90% of the posts in this thread. ATOTers getting it by the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd date...LOL! Get real.
Originally posted by: Rill22
I'm pretty taken aback by some of these answers. As a 23 year old girl, I would never have sex on the 2nd date. I am not arguing that other girls who do are slutty, because yeah, it is different for everyone, but 2 or 3 dates just seems so rushed. Like you're trying to get something over with.
It's pretty disheartening to read all these posts with guys saying, "3 dates or she's gone. Put out or get out." Nice to know you have your priorities straight. Of course this is a generalization, and many relationships have been very successful after having sex early, but it is just simply not something I would do within the first week. Some of you guys are saying it's ridiculous to wait longer than that; I think it's ridiculous NOT to wait longer than that.
Whatever floats your boat though, I guess. If I was dumped after a week for no sex, then that's probably not the person I should be with anyways.
Originally posted by: DAGTA
Originally posted by: Rill22
I'm pretty taken aback by some of these answers. As a 23 year old girl, I would never have sex on the 2nd date. I am not arguing that other girls who do are slutty, because yeah, it is different for everyone, but 2 or 3 dates just seems so rushed. Like you're trying to get something over with.
It's pretty disheartening to read all these posts with guys saying, "3 dates or she's gone. Put out or get out." Nice to know you have your priorities straight. Of course this is a generalization, and many relationships have been very successful after having sex early, but it is just simply not something I would do within the first week. Some of you guys are saying it's ridiculous to wait longer than that; I think it's ridiculous NOT to wait longer than that.
Whatever floats your boat though, I guess. If I was dumped after a week for no sex, then that's probably not the person I should be with anyways.
Refreshing for me to see a post from a woman that's not a slut. I don't rush into sex and any woman I'm dating who rushes into sex is not someone I want to be with.
Originally posted by: DAGTA
Originally posted by: Rill22
I'm pretty taken aback by some of these answers. As a 23 year old girl, I would never have sex on the 2nd date. I am not arguing that other girls who do are slutty, because yeah, it is different for everyone, but 2 or 3 dates just seems so rushed. Like you're trying to get something over with.
It's pretty disheartening to read all these posts with guys saying, "3 dates or she's gone. Put out or get out." Nice to know you have your priorities straight. Of course this is a generalization, and many relationships have been very successful after having sex early, but it is just simply not something I would do within the first week. Some of you guys are saying it's ridiculous to wait longer than that; I think it's ridiculous NOT to wait longer than that.
Whatever floats your boat though, I guess. If I was dumped after a week for no sex, then that's probably not the person I should be with anyways.
Refreshing for me to see a post from a woman that's not a slut. I don't rush into sex and any woman I'm dating who rushes into sex is not someone I want to be with.
Originally posted by: DAGTA
Originally posted by: Rill22
I'm pretty taken aback by some of these answers. As a 23 year old girl, I would never have sex on the 2nd date. I am not arguing that other girls who do are slutty, because yeah, it is different for everyone, but 2 or 3 dates just seems so rushed. Like you're trying to get something over with.
It's pretty disheartening to read all these posts with guys saying, "3 dates or she's gone. Put out or get out." Nice to know you have your priorities straight. Of course this is a generalization, and many relationships have been very successful after having sex early, but it is just simply not something I would do within the first week. Some of you guys are saying it's ridiculous to wait longer than that; I think it's ridiculous NOT to wait longer than that.
Whatever floats your boat though, I guess. If I was dumped after a week for no sex, then that's probably not the person I should be with anyways.
Refreshing for me to see a post from a woman that's not a slut. I don't rush into sex and any woman I'm dating who rushes into sex is not someone I want to be with.
Originally posted by: Rill22
I'm pretty taken aback by some of these answers. As a 23 year old girl, I would never have sex on the 2nd date. I am not arguing that other girls who do are slutty, because yeah, it is different for everyone, but 2 or 3 dates just seems so rushed. Like you're trying to get something over with.
It's pretty disheartening to read all these posts with guys saying, "3 dates or she's gone. Put out or get out." Nice to know you have your priorities straight. Of course this is a generalization, and many relationships have been very successful after having sex early, but it is just simply not something I would do within the first week. Some of you guys are saying it's ridiculous to wait longer than that; I think it's ridiculous NOT to wait longer than that.
Whatever floats your boat though, I guess. If I was dumped after a week for no sex, then that's probably not the person I should be with anyways.
Originally posted by: spidey07
anything longer than 3 dates is ridiculous.
What if she's bad in bed? Then you've wasted time.
It's the accepted norm. The 3rd date rule.
Originally posted by: spidey07
anything longer than 3 dates is ridiculous.
What if she's bad in bed? Then you've wasted time.
It's the accepted norm. The 3rd date rule.
Originally posted by: spidey07
anything longer than 3 dates is ridiculous.
What if she's bad in bed? Then you've wasted time.
It's the accepted norm. The 3rd date rule.
Originally posted by: yowolabi
Originally posted by: Rill22
I'm pretty taken aback by some of these answers. As a 23 year old girl, I would never have sex on the 2nd date. I am not arguing that other girls who do are slutty, because yeah, it is different for everyone, but 2 or 3 dates just seems so rushed. Like you're trying to get something over with.
It's pretty disheartening to read all these posts with guys saying, "3 dates or she's gone. Put out or get out." Nice to know you have your priorities straight. Of course this is a generalization, and many relationships have been very successful after having sex early, but it is just simply not something I would do within the first week. Some of you guys are saying it's ridiculous to wait longer than that; I think it's ridiculous NOT to wait longer than that.
Whatever floats your boat though, I guess. If I was dumped after a week for no sex, then that's probably not the person I should be with anyways.
When i first date a girl, usually it's about a date per week. So including talking on a phone before the first date, it would be three weeks to a month before we had third date sex. Is a month also far shorter than you would wait?
Originally posted by: DAGTA
Originally posted by: Rill22
I'm pretty taken aback by some of these answers. As a 23 year old girl, I would never have sex on the 2nd date. I am not arguing that other girls who do are slutty, because yeah, it is different for everyone, but 2 or 3 dates just seems so rushed. Like you're trying to get something over with.
It's pretty disheartening to read all these posts with guys saying, "3 dates or she's gone. Put out or get out." Nice to know you have your priorities straight. Of course this is a generalization, and many relationships have been very successful after having sex early, but it is just simply not something I would do within the first week. Some of you guys are saying it's ridiculous to wait longer than that; I think it's ridiculous NOT to wait longer than that.
Whatever floats your boat though, I guess. If I was dumped after a week for no sex, then that's probably not the person I should be with anyways.
Refreshing for me to see a post from a woman that's not a slut. I don't rush into sex and any woman I'm dating who rushes into sex is not someone I want to be with after the freaky sex.
Originally posted by: Rill22
Originally posted by: yowolabi
Originally posted by: Rill22
I'm pretty taken aback by some of these answers. As a 23 year old girl, I would never have sex on the 2nd date. I am not arguing that other girls who do are slutty, because yeah, it is different for everyone, but 2 or 3 dates just seems so rushed. Like you're trying to get something over with.
It's pretty disheartening to read all these posts with guys saying, "3 dates or she's gone. Put out or get out." Nice to know you have your priorities straight. Of course this is a generalization, and many relationships have been very successful after having sex early, but it is just simply not something I would do within the first week. Some of you guys are saying it's ridiculous to wait longer than that; I think it's ridiculous NOT to wait longer than that.
Whatever floats your boat though, I guess. If I was dumped after a week for no sex, then that's probably not the person I should be with anyways.
When i first date a girl, usually it's about a date per week. So including talking on a phone before the first date, it would be three weeks to a month before we had third date sex. Is a month also far shorter than you would wait?
Again, like I said, it's different for everyone. I'm not going to slap a number or a time frame on how long you should wait. You're trying to make 3 dates acceptable because it's spread out over a month, and that may be fine for you, but the amount of time actually spent in each other's company is really what matters to me. So no, if I had 3 dates over the course of a month with one person, I would still not have sex.
I'm also trying to get my point across that everyone is different, and even I'm putting restrictions on something that I just don't know how I would feel at the time with a particular person. But as of now, 2 or 3 dates just isn't acceptable. I am fine with everyone else if that's their "maximum", they just won't be who I date.
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
I hope you filthy people get tested for disease.
I would say at minimum 3 or 4 months, not dates.
If a girl tried to get in my pants on the 3rd date I would dump her ass. Why? Think of how many dudes she's slept with. Disgusting.
In all fairness, I doubt you'd disagree that you're a bit of a strange ranger.
I used to feel like you do, but over the years it's become clear to me that women with experience, women who are themselves sexually charged, are about 100 times more fun to date than women who are willing to wait 3 or 4 months for sex. No woman who has an appropriate sex drive is going to want to wait that long. If I'm going to wait 3 months to sleep with a woman, I might as well haul off and become a Quaker.
Originally posted by: yowolabi
I'm not trying to make anything acceptable, i'm not interested in convincing you to change your mind. My advice to my sister and to a daughter i might have, would be to make sure they completely knew a guy before sleeping with him. Any guy that had interest in more than her body will be completely willing to wait until she is comfortable. You just said a "week" repeatedly, and I wondered if you defining 3 dates as being in a week had anything to do with your perspective.
Personally I think that having a maximum number of dates is ridiculous.... but I also feel that way about minimum numbers too. People have known each other... or "dated" for a week or two and known the other person well enough to get married and have successful marriages. The argument about not really knowing a person seems good on the surface, but there's still a whole lot you don't know after several months. The number of people who were with someone for even years and ended up saying "i really didn't know them at all" is endless.
For me, the only correct answer to how long you should wait is... until both of you are comfortable with the idea and you know you're both after the same thing. If you can have sex and won't regret it no matter what happens with the relationship afterward, then you've waited long enough.
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Originally posted by: spidey07
anything longer than 3 dates is ridiculous.
What if she's bad in bed? Then you've wasted time.
It's the accepted norm. The 3rd date rule.
According to whom? Sounds like news to me.
Jeebus. Like women are worth norhing if not for sex.